Description
Literature Review Paper
A literature review aims to highlight the current state of knowledge regarding a topic under study. Literature reviews are comprised of secondary sources and as such do not report any new or original experimental work. The main purpose of a literature review is to situate the current study within the body of literature and to provide context for the reader. A literature review is not a summary but a synthesis of the material you have read. In this course the purpose of the literature review is to answer a significant clinical question.
Instructions:
Your paper needs to follow the following criteria:
- Choose a problem faced by clients in your practice area that you think is important and would like to learn more about.
- Use your knowledge of PICO to develop a well-build narrow clinical question. For example: In adult patients with total hip replacements (P), how effective is pain medication (I) compared to aerobic stretching (C) in controlling post-operative pain (O)? (the development of the PICO question should not be including in the paper).
- Write a five (5) page literature review paper on the standing knowledge of the chosen question.
- Include a minimum of five (5) journal articles, at least three (3) from nursing journals. However, make sure that the (5) journals are the one’s analyzed and synthesized in the results and discussion sections.
- The body of the paper should be made of the following titled sections: Title (introduction), Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion.
- Provide a specific and concise tentative title for your literature review paper (You may use the results or at least the variables in the title).
- Abstract is not required
- Include a 1-page introduction of your topic (background information), the focus/aim of your review. The introduction should include a statement of the problem, briefly explain the significance of your topic study, and act to introduce the reader to your definitions and background. Must include your main statement (i.e. the purpose of this review is...{PICO Question}).
- The method section should include sources, databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and other information that establish credibility to your paper.
- The results should summarize the findings of studies that have been conducted on your topic. For each study you should briefly explain its purpose, procedure for data collection and major findings. This is the section where you will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of studies.
- The discussion should be like a conclusion portion of an essay paper. It serves as a summary of the body of your literature review and should highlight the most important findings. Your analysis should help you to draw conclusions. In this section you would discussion any consensus or disagreement on the topic. It can also include any strengths and weaknesses in general of the research area. If you believe there is more to research, you may include that here.
- Finally, you will need to conclude your paper. At this point you have put substantial effort into your paper. Close this chapter with a summary of the paper, major findings and any major recommendation for the profession.
- In general, your paper should show a sense of direction and contain a definite central idea supported with evidence. The writing should be logical, and the ideas should be linked together in a logical sequence. The ideas need to be put together clearly to the writer and to the reader.
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
Outline
Introduction
Body
Conclusion
References
Running Head: LITERATURE REVIEW
1
Literature Review on a More Effective Cancer Treatment Method Between Surgery
and Therapy (Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy)
Student’s Name
Course
Professor’s Name
Date
LITERATURE REVIEW
2
Literature Review on a More Effective Cancer Treatment Method Between Surgery
and Therapy (Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy)
The current global health reports show that cancer is the second top cause of death
worldwide. In 2018 alone, cancer claimed the lives of approximately 9.6 million people. The
current statistics show that out of every six reported deaths globally, at least one is caused by
cancer. Various treatment options have been established to assist in controlling, removing,
and killing the active cancerous cells in the body. Among the commonly used treatment
methods are therapy and surgery (Arruebo et al., 2011). Therapy involves both chemotherapy
and radiotherapy. Typically, chemotherapy involves the use of drugs to kill the cancer cells in
the body to prevent them from spreading to adjacent cells (Arruebo et al., 2011). On the other
hand, radiotherapy entails the use of extremely high-powered energy beams, for instance, Xrays and gamma radiations, to kill the cancer cells in the body (Arruebo et al., 2011).
However, surgery aims to remove the cancer cells that are clumped in a single area to prevent
them from spreading to adjacent cells, and eventually, the entire body.
The use of therapy and surgery for cancer treatment has turned out to be a major
debate since most people still do not understand a more effective cancer treatment option
between the two (Arruebo et al., 2011). Based on my PICO knowledge, in patients with
cancer, is surgery treatment more effective compared to therapy in controlling and killing
cancer cells? This paper reviews the existing state of knowledge concerning the effectiveness
of therapy and surgery in the treatment of cancer in today’s society. More specifically, the
paper compares the two treatment approaches and recommends the most effective treatment
method based on the information that has been documented on the secondary resources. The
purpose of this review is to establish a more effective cancer treatment method between
therapy and surgery. Besides, the paper will ...
Review
Review
