Another Assignment are you ready

Jul 1st, 2014
KateS
Category:
Philosophy
Price: $30 USD

Question description

When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist confirmation bias by seeking out sources that might contradict your own point of view?

This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking.

This assignment is divided into two (2) parts.

In Part I of the assignment, you will read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes, review one (1) Website in order to gather information, and engage in pre-writing to examine your thoughts.

In Part II of the assignment, you will write an essay geared towards synthesizing your ideas. As author E.M. Forster said, "How do I know what I think until I see what I say?"

Part I Preparation and Pre-writing:

Follow the steps below to explore an issue through reading and writing –

1. Read "The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful" by Peter Elbow at http://www.procon.org/sourcefiles/believinggame.pdf. Devise strategies for playing the "Believing Game" and the "Doubting Game," which are discussed in the Elbow article. According to the article, "the doubting game represents the kind of thinking most widely honored and taught. It’s the disciplined practice of trying to be as skeptical and analytic as possible with every idea we encounter. The believing game is the mirror image of the doubting game or critical thinking. It’s the disciplined practice of trying to be as welcoming as possible to every idea we encounter."

2. Select one (1) of the issues from ProCon.org that your professor has approved as a topic choice for your essay. Go to www.procon.org, scroll to the list of issues, click on the issue you selected, and read the background information section on the issue.

a. To play the "Believing Game," read either the Pro section

or the Con section on the www.procon.org Website – whichever argument is in opposition to your position on the chosen issue. Consider at least three (3) of the premises (reasons) listed in that section. Apply the "believing" questions suggested by Elbow, such as "What's interesting or helpful about the view? What would you notice if you believed this view? … In what sense or under what conditions might this idea be true?"

b. To play the "Doubting Game," read either the Pro column

or the Con column on the www.procon.org Website – whichever argument is in agreement with your position. Consider at least three (3) of the premises (reasons) listed in that section. Apply the "doubting" questions suggested by Elbow, such as the journalistic questions who, what, when, where, why, how.


Synthesizing and Writing: Part II

Now that you have examined your thinking about an issue by pre-writing about your ideas –

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

1. Present an argument on an issue by stating your conclusion and identifying your premises.

2. Identify three (3) premises of the argument in

opposition to your conclusion, and describe your reactions to these premises, based on the believing questions suggested by Elbow, such as

 

"What's interesting or helpful about the view? What would you notice if you believed this view? In what sense or under what conditions might this idea be true?"


3. Identify three (3) premises of the argument in agreement with your conclusion, and explain your responses to the journalistic questions you asked in order to probe these premises, based on the doubting questions suggested by Elbow, such as the journalistic questions who, what, when, where, why, and how.

4. Examine at least three (3) types of biases that you likely experienced when you read the premises on the Pro side of the argument and the premises on the Con side of the argument. (

5. Describe whether or not your position on the issue has changed. Indicate whether or not your premises supporting the issue have changed. Explain why or why not.

The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:

 Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.

 

Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
(997)
School: UT Austin
PREMIUM TUTOR

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

8 Reviews


Summary
Quality
Communication
On Time
Value
Five Star Tutor
Dec 6th, 2016
" Outstanding Job!!!! "
SjSurvivor143
Nov 21st, 2016
" Thanks for the help. "
Joemoe
Nov 7th, 2016
" <3 it, thanks for saving me time. "
tinytim47
Oct 29th, 2016
" Wow this is really good.... didn't expect it. Sweet!!!! "
pmallory
Oct 25th, 2016
" Totally impressed with results!! :-) "
mixedballz
Oct 16th, 2016
" excellent work as always thanks for the help "
kiln82
Oct 2nd, 2016
" awesome work thanks "
darnay
Sep 23rd, 2016
" The best tutor out there!!!! "
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1822 tutors are online

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors