Scenario: You are interviewing for a position as human services professional who will be expected to interact regularly with juveniles and adults involved with the criminal justice system. The hiring committee wants to choose a candidate who can write clearly and who demonstrates a solid understanding of standard procedures in the juvenile versus adult criminal justice systems.Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper comparing the procedures that law enforcement officers and courts should follow when interacting with juveniles versus adults during the stages of intake, prosecution, adjudication, and disposition.Choose 1 of the following videos from the University Library of a court session to use as an example scenario for this assignment:"Rodrick: Juvenile Court in Session""Kenneth: Juvenile Court in Session""Kymyada: Juvenile Court in Session""Morris: Juvenile Court in Session"In your paper, ensure you:Summarize the case you chose and the legal issues facing the juvenile and the court.Define the role and key parameters of the juvenile justice system.Explain the function of juvenile vs. adult courts.Summarize the court’s philosophy of juvenile justice used in this case.Explain how law enforcement and the courts might have interacted differently with this person as a juvenile than if they had been an adult.Summarize the rights and confidentiality protections that exist for this juvenile that are not the same for adults. Use the State Profiles from the National Juvenile Defender Center, and include at least 1 policy specific to your state that would be relevant in this case.Describe at least 2 additional factors that officers and the court must consider for the juvenile in this case that may not work the same way for adults.Use language and terms appropriate for each justice system when comparing juveniles versus adults.Cite at least 2 academic sources. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Question 1:   John Alien, a native and citizen of England, entered the U.S. under a non-immigrant visa in April 2004.  During his stay in the U.S. he fell in love with a U.S. Citizen, married, and adjusted his status to a Lawful Permanent Resident.  He became an LPR in April 2006.  He has two children (ages 3 and 5) from the marriage and owns a beautiful home in Florida.  He is an IT specialist for a very large military defense contact corporation and earns approximately $130,000 per year.  He has a growing 401(k) and excellent health insurance for his family through his job.  With his robust salary, his wife is able to stay at home and raise their two children.  He has an impeccable reputation in the community and is active in his local church and his children’s school activities.  In May 2016, John was arrested for possession of cocaine.  He has no prior criminal history.  He pleaded guilty to the crime and was placed in immigration removal proceedings for the drug conviction. The Notice to Appear charges John with violating §237(a)(2)(B)(i) of the INA, as having been convicted of a drug offense.   You are the immigration judge presiding over his removal hearing.  -Can John be placed in removal proceedings?  Will you as a judge sustain the charge of removabilty?  -If John is removable and the proceedings are proper, what forms of relief from removal are available to John?  If any relief is available, would you grant such relief?  Why? Decide the case as the judge. Question 2: Teddy lives in Los Angeles, having arrived through crossing the Mexican border unlawfully 10 months ago.  Teddy mostly gets by doing odd jobs and whatever he can do to make some cash.  He would like to obtain work authorization so he can get a steady job and earn some more money, afford a place to live, and improve his overall standard of living.  His friend, who has a work permit and a good job, tells Teddy he got his work permit after he was granted asylum in the U.S.  Interested in obtaining asylum for himself, Teddy shows up at your law office asking what he has to do to get asylum. -What specifically would you tell Teddy regarding what he needs to show to obtain asylum?  After your explanation, Teddy says he's not sure he would qualify, but that he's a "great storyteller" and since there are no strict documentary requirements for asylum, he's sure he could convince the asylum office to grant his case.  Teddy asks you to assist him in preparing his application and prepping for his asylum interview. -How should you respond to Teddy?   Will you assist him?  What additional questions would you ask, or additional information would you gather. After you speak more with Teddy, he asks your advice on what could happen to him if he were to make up a false narrative in an attempt to obtain asylum.  -What would you tell Teddy? Please explain your responses in detail.   Question 3: Bernard is a convicted felony drug trafficker who was deported from the U.S. three years ago to his native country.  Three months ago, Bernard reentered the U.S. without authorization and has been living under an assumed identity.  Bernard has no legal immigration status in the U.S.  He has also resumed his previous drug trafficking activities, managing a large-scale illegal drug distribution operation in the New York City metro area.  ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) received a tip from an informant that Bernard is back and up to his old tricks, but he's now going by the name "Ricky."  ERO officers conducted an investigation, including surveillance operations and have concluded Ricky is really Bernard.  ERO officers now come to you, an ICE attorney, asking for advice on the best legal course of action to remove Bernard, AKA Ricky once again.     What are the options for ERO to remove Bernard, AKA Ricky?  Please explain, in detail, and discuss all possible options. Which option is the best and why?  Please explain, in detail.