Research Critique Guidelines – Part I Use this document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses. Qualitative Studies Background of Study 1. Summary of studies. Include problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research question. How do these two articles support the nurse practice issue you chose? 1. Discuss how these two articles will be used to answer your PICOT question. 2. Describe how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in your PICOT question. Method of Study: 1. State the methods of the two articles you are comparing and describe how they are different. 2. Consider the methods you identified in your chosen articles and state one benefit and one limitation of each method. Results of Study 1. Summarize the key findings of each study in one or two comprehensive paragraphs. 2. What are the implications of the two studies in nursing practice? Ethical Considerations 1. Discuss two ethical consideration in conducting research. 2. Describe how the researchers in the two articles you choose took these ethical considerations into account while performing their research. © 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Course Code NRS-433V Class Code NRS-433V-O505 Criteria Content Percentage 75.0% Qualitative Studies 5.0% Background of Study 10.0% Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue 15.0% Method of Study 15.0% Results of Study 15.0% Ethical Considerations 15.0% Organization and Effectiveness 15.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete. Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete. Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted. The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is incomplete. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles presented in the essay is incomplete. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 200.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information and detail are required. A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is incomplete. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies. A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is summarized but there are significant inaccuracies or omissions. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 3: Satisfactory (83.00%) N/A Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Some rational or information is needed. A general discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are summarized. There some inaccuracies or partial omissions. More information is needed. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is discussed but there are some inaccuracies, or some information is needed. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 4: Good (94.00%) N/A Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity or support. A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is generally described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. There minor are inaccuracies. Some detail is required for accuracy or clarity. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented; some detail in needed for accuracy or clarity. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 5: Excellent (100.00%) Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question. A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is described in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. A detailed discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented. Comments Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned Literature Evaluation Table Student Name: Summary of Clinical Issue (200-250 words): Hypertension lists as one of the nursing problems that affect the normal living of an individual. Hypertension refers to a long-term condition where the blood pressure in the arteries is persistently high. In most cases, referred to as high blood pressure and risks the life of the patient as it can be prone to other heart diseases. Some of the symptoms of hypertension are headache, fever, and shortness in a breath but most patients do not have any symptoms until the condition gets to lifethreatening levels. The two types of hypertension are primary and secondary depending on the cause among adults. Primary hypertension is common among adults and is caused by unidentifiable factors. Secondary hypertension is caused by underlying factors such as kidney failure and diabetes. Medical statistics show that adults especially men above the age of 40 falls under a higher risk of suffering from hypertension. Medically, the condition is termed as a lifestyle disease because it requires management based on daily activities. Some of the recommended lifestyle management activities are exercise and a balanced diet. Clinical management of hypertension is applicable under certain circumstances especially that cause cardiac diseases. Hypertension as a medical problem calls for further research to define a specific treatment approach to replace the management guidelines. © 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. PICOT Question: For adults between above the age of 40 suffering from hypertension and with other recurring medical conditions (P), will regular exercise and managed diet (I), compared to medication dependent patients (C), stand a chance of reducing the risk of suffering heart diseases(O) in eight (8) months of recovery (T). Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 APA-Formatted Haque, A. F., Uddin, F., & Vargas, G., Cajita, M. I., Lochmann, K. A., Grossman, A., Article Citation with Hamid, F. (2019). A Clinical Whitehouse, E., & Han, H. R. Ebert, C., & Gatton, C. (2017). Permalink Audit on Management of (2017). Use of short messaging Aromatherapy as Symptom Hypertension. Chattagram Maa- service for hypertension Management for O-Shishu Hospital Medical management: a systematic Hematology/Oncology/Blood College Journal, 18(1), 49-51. review. The Journal of and Marrow Transplant cardiovascular nursing, 32(3), Patients. Biology of Blood and 260. 2 Marrow Transplantation, 23(3), S477. How Does the Article The article describes a clinical The use of Short Messaging The article analyzes the Relate to the PICOT audit on the management of Services (SMS) to manage challenges of managing Question? hypertension which is the hypertension. hypertension among Pediatric nursing practice issue. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Patients. Quantitative, Quantitative because the analysis Qualitative because the study Quantitative because the analysis Qualitative (How do involves a collection of depends on a literature review of depends on statistical figures. you know?) numerical data from the clinic. published data. Purpose Statement To identify the deficiency of To identify the impact of SMS in To evaluate the challenges that hypertension management the management of hypertension. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Research Question practices by patients, physicians, Patients face in the management and cardiologists in the clinic. of hypertension. The impact and deficiency of How the use of SMS between the How to sustainably manage hypertension management patient and physician to hypertension among 3 Outcome practices in both developed and communicate affects the Hematopoietic Stem Cell developing countries. management of hypertension? Patients. Hypertension management The use of SMS for direct Sustainable management of deficiency is low in both communication between the hypertension among developing and developed patient and physician impacts the Hematopoietic Stem Cell countries. management of hypertension Patients is challenging. positively. Setting A clinic in Chatt Maa Shi Data collection from PubMed, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital (Where did the study Hospital in Bangladesh CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane, Medical Center take place?) Sample Method Scopus, and PsycINFO 80 patients of mean age Six studies from medically Hematopoietic Stem Cell 54.9±9.9years published articles. Patients at the Medical center Data collection through Independent systematic literature Hypertension algorithm analysis interviews and recording of search and meta-analysis family, medical and hypertension management history of patients. 4 Key Findings of the 78.4% of the patients properly The use of SMS for Management of hypertension Study managed hypertension communication aids in BP among hematopoietic stem cell 80 patients, 44 patients needed management of hypertension. patients is challenging and combined treatment practices. The mode of communication is requires advanced technology for Hypertension before a diagnosis only effective when the sustainability. of diabetes on most patients individual patient communicates with the physician. Recommendations of Hypertension management SMS has a high potential to Technology and double the Researcher deficiency is low with a trigger great innovation for the management of hypertension can significant 20% level. management of hypertension. play a significant role in reducing such challenges. Criteria Article 4 Article 5 Article 6 APA-Formatted Lurbe, E., Torró, I., Álvarez, J., Gabb, G. M., Mangoni, A. A., Tocci, G., Cicero, A. F., Salvetti, Article Citation with Aguilar, F., Mancia, G., Redon, Anderson, C. S., Cowley, D., M., Musumeci, M. B., Ferrucci, Permalink J., & Redon, P. (2019). The Dowden, J. S., Golledge, J., ... & A., Borghi, C., & Volpe, M. 5 impact on office blood pressure Schlaich, M. (2016). Guideline (2017). Attitudes and preferences categories and ambulatory blood for the diagnosis and for the clinical management of pressure discrepancies of the management of hypertension in hypertension and hypertension- European Society of adults—2016. Medical Journal related cerebrovascular disease in Hypertension and the American of Australia, 205(2), 85-89. the general practice: results of Academy of Pediatrics Italian hypertension and brain Guidelines for Management of survey. Clinical Hypertension in Children and hypertension, 23(1), 10. Adolescents. Journal of hypertension. How Does the Article The article analyzes the impact The article outlines guidelines on The article analyzes the attitudes Relate to the PICOT of guidelines provided by the the diagnosis and management of and preferences of clinical Question? European Society Hypertension hypertension among adults. management of hypertension and and America Academy of other cardiovascular diseases. Pediatricians on the classification 6 of hypertension based on office and ambulatory. Quantitative, Quantitative because it entails Qualitative because the Qualitative because the research Qualitative (How do experiments and numerical data guidelines are derived from study depends on an Italian you know?) analysis. literature analysis of published Survey. data. Purpose Statement The impacts of guides from ESH Identify guidelines to improve The preference and attitude of and AAP in the management of the diagnosis and management of patients towards clinical hypertension among adolescents hypertension among adults. management of hypertension and and children. Research Question cardiac disease. AAP and ESH guidelines impact Diagnosis and management of Most people have a positive the management of hypertension hypertension among adults attitude and prefer clinical positively. depend on a set of medical management of hypertension. guidelines. Outcome AAP and ESH guidelines Patients with a persistent blood Most Italian physicians refer to improved the normal pressure 160/100mmHg risk use left ventricular hypertrophy 7 management of hypertension but cardiovascular diseases and frequently associated with CVD impacted negatively for the should start an anti-hypertensive for the management of ambulatory classified therapy. hypertension. The National Heart Foundation Italian medical center hypertension. Setting AAP and ESH recognized clinic. (Where did the study of Australia take place?) Sample 2957 youths aged between 5-18 Statistical data of 6 million and a subgroup of 2467 hypertensive adults from participants, 3941 office BP Australia 591 Italian physicians assessment. Method Practical clinical evaluations Literature review Questionnaire for a survey Key Findings of the The application of the two Early anti-hypertensive therapy Most physicians prefer clinical Study guidelines creates differences in reduces the risk of cardiovascular management because according the classification for the diseases among hypertensive to the survey Italian physicians patients. consider left ventricular 8 management of hypertension hypertrophy frequently among children and adolescents. associated with CVD. Recommendations of Application of AAP and ESH Patients with the persistence of Physicians prefer to use clinical the Researcher guidelines can affect the blood pressure above management which is more management procedures based 140/100mmHg should consider effective among Italian patients. on groups classified on office anti-hypertensive therapy. and ambulatory basis. Links Article 1-https://www.banglajol.info/index.php/CMOSHMCJ/article/view/42136 Article 2-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5085898/ Article 3-https://www.bbmt.org/action/showPdf?pii=S1083-8791%2816%2931119-3 Article 4- https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00004872-201912000-00014 Article 5- https://www.mja.com.au/system/files/issues/10.5694mja16.00526.pdf Article 6- https://clinicalhypertension.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40885-017-0066-0 9
Purchase answer to see full attachment