WNS 215 week7


Question Description

Read these three draft and give a feedback for each. fill out the peer review paper for all three.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Aneta Rogowski S. White RWS 305 February 8, 2020 Project 1: Memoir Part One: Analysis of Mentor Text Bharati is an Indian immigrant that came to the United States in 1961. She came here in order to earn her degree in M.F.A. and a Ph.D. in literature. She has a sister named Mira that also came to the states to study child psychology and pre-school education. Her short story, “Two Ways to Belong in America” was written in September 1996. I think that some of the important context that this short story has is the emotion that has been put behind writing it. Another important context that we should understand is the culture shock that both of these sisters are going through especially when it comes to them getting married to men’s that their father did not choose. The discourse community that the author is targeting is the people that come to the United States from a different country and experience culture shock when they get here. I chose this story as my mentor text because I am from Poland. I may not come here to get a degree, but I was adopted into an American family where I didn’t know any English and experienced one of the hardest culture shocks anyone can experience. The community that the author is writing about is the immigrant community in the United States. Specifically, those that come from India and have to adjust to the American culture. This is an outsider community that the author is targeting because she is walking the same shoes as many others that are immigrants in this country. At the same time, she is targeting an insider community because she is also targeting the United States government and how they are changing the immigrant laws. In the story her sister said, “If America wants to play the manipulative game, I'll play it, too.” This quote shows that the government does not want immigrants to be able to have dual citizenship and visit back and forth from India to America. Therefore, Mira decided to become a U.S. citizen to please the government. The assumptions that are being challenged are that people who come to America from overseas to study don’t have to worry about citizenship or anything else. Which this story shows that, that is not the case. We have been struggling with immigration for a long time and those people that are doing their best to have a better life just get shut down because they are not “actual” citizens. Although, they are trying to be and live their life freely. Another assumption that is being challenged is that the people from India must always follow their culture and religion when it comes to marriage. In the story the author states, “Mira married an Indian student in 1962 who was getting his business administration degree at Wayne State University.” This shows that although the father did not approve of this man that Mira married, she still did. And he was also Indian so she stuck with her culture. One of the creative techniques that the author used is that she stated exactly how her sister was feeling when they were talking over the phone to each other about being in the U.S. and how the government treats immigrants. Showing true emotion and really expressing the frustration made me almost feet it on the inside as I was reading the short story. In their phone conversation Mira showed her true feelings when she said, "I feel used," Mira raged on the phone the other night. "I feel manipulated and discarded. This is such an unfair way to treat a person who was invited to stay and work here because of her talent. My employer went to the LN.S. and petitioned for the labor certification… How dare America now change its rules in midstream? If America wants to make new rules curtailing benefits of legal immigrants, they should apply only to immigrants who arrive after those rules are already in place." Another technique that I really liked is how she separated each paragraph and how well the flow of the story was. I felt that each paragraph started with a new topic and a new significance of their story. It made is seem like she really thought out what she wanted to put into the story and what were the things that didn’t need to be put in the story. The detail and emotion behind it all is what really drew me to her story. This author’s short story uses pathos couple of times throughout it. One place that she uses pathos is when she describes that her and her sister both married men that their father did not approve of. She stated “I was prepared for (and even welcomed) the emotional strain that came with marrying outside my ethnic community. In 33 years of marriage, we have lived in every part of North America. By choosing a husband who was not my father's selection.” This shows that you can be happy even if a father doesn’t choose your husband for you. She went against her tradition but remained within her culture by marrying an Indian man that was also in America trying to earn his degree. The author really uses the marriage as one of the main culture assumptions because, in India, the father is supposed to choose the man that his daughter merry. This is what a lot of people in America understand from learning different cultures throughout the years. This story is a perfect example that a person does not have to always follow their culture. This text has taught me a lot about what to put into my memoir and what I should take out. I will definitely try my best to incorporate the conversations with my sisters that we had before we made the decision to get adopted and agreeing on the American family that wanted to adopt us. I will also incorporate all the thoughts and emotions that I was going through when I came to America and what huge culture shock it was. Part 2: Memoir Community: Families that choose to adopt kids specifically from a different country. Memory/Event: August 29th, 2003 – getting adopted by an American family - Situation: Getting adopted - Conflict: Do we want to get adopted by an American family and move to a different country, or do we stay in the orphanage and wait for a polish family to chose to adopt my sisters and I? - Action: conversations with my sisters/orphanage staff/future adoptive family – expressing pros/cons - Climax: Coming to a decision - Resolution: It wasn’t hard coming to a decision to get adopted by an American family because the pros out weight the cons. Audience: Those who think that adopting kids from a different country is scary and hard Assumptions to clarify: That all foreign adoptions fall through and it doesn’t last once the kids get older and move out of the house. Meaning/Significance: Clarifying this helps those who would want to adopt from a different country put their minds at ease and gives them hope that it can be a successful adoption. It also will show that no matter if you adopt children or not, at the end of the day family is everything. Part One: Mentor Text Analysis In the short memoir, Se Habla Espanol, Tanya Barrientos brings to light the cultural divide between Spanish speaking Latinos and the Latinos who don’t have the innate knowledge of the Spanish language. Barrientos wasn’t taught Spanish by her Spanish speaking parents because they “whole-heartedly embraced the notion of the American melting pot.” (1) She tells this personal story for those who can relate to her: being of Hispanic origin but not “fitting in” with her Hispanic community because she is not fluent in her native language, but also not “fitting in” with her “Anglo American” acquaintances because she is brown. This memoir is also written for those who feel a divide between them and their own ethnic communities because of a language barrier. She challenges the notion that all native-born people are inherently multilingual by expounding the very real, intangible border within the Latino community. To appeal to the Latino audience, the author employs some Spanish words and phrases throughout her memoir. To appeal to those who may not know much about the Latino community, she provides a backstory in which we learn that originally, Barrientos enjoyed being a paradox. She “liked being the brown girl who defied expectations.” (1) Her friends would tell her that she didn’t seem Mexican, and she liked the thought of that. Growing up in the 70s in the U.S., the melting pot concept was embraced nationwide. Consequently, assimilation was the main priority for her family, so did not see the need to teach their children Spanish once moving to the states. She then goes on to explain that as she grew older, times became more progressive and society began to value multilingual individuals. This shift was concerning for her in relation to her ethnic community. She had advanced out of her impressionable years and missed the opportunity to learn Spanish from her parents. Her intended audience can relate to this social conflict of not having the innate knowledge of their native language because of the migration to the states for an integrated life. In regards to the structure of her memoir, Barrientos uses a flashback and frame story to provide her readers with context to the initial story that was introduced in her memoir. She begins by explaining her current dilemma of not being able to enroll in a class to learn Spanish without being slightly ridiculed for not already being cognizant of her native language. This is followed by a frame story flashback to when and why her family moved to the states from Guatemala. She explains the social environment in which she grew up and how it shaped her childhood perspective. She also tells of a time when her sisters and her mother were disrespected by her school’s registrar for being Mexican, which is told to provide a vessel for any minorities to relate to her story. As she grew older and became more aware, she admits that she equated speaking Spanish with being poor. Then, (not so) suddenly, society shifted within the next two decades of her life, and people in the U.S. began to embrace their ethnic identities. “The Spanish language was supposedly the glue that held the new Latino community together. But in my case it was what kept me apart.” (2) Barrientos reveals these truths in an effort to connect to her audience and to create a sense of understanding of the social environment she was submerged in, and how it inversely affected her inner thoughts and emotions. After learning the reasoning behind her class enrollment, we then circulate back and Barrientos admits that she was a bit embarrassed. She noted that her bilingual friends did comforted her by telling her that she was making too much of it, and that her heritage and appearance were enough to “legitimize my membership in the Latin American club.” (2) Throughout the piece, Barrientos engages her audience through a strong sense of pathos. There are constant references to societal appeals while she explains her rollercoaster of emotions as she is coming of age. As she appeals to her audience, we gauge that Barrientos was constantly questioning her sense of self. She concludes her memoir by suggesting that maybe there is a community of thousands of Latinos who don’t speak Spanish, and are learning behind closed doors, and are afraid to admit it. She associates herself with this community and proudly signs off by saying “Aqui estoy. Spanish-challenged and pura Latina.” (2) My memoir will personally be inspired by Barrientos’ structure, use of description, and internal reflection. She introduces her current dilemma, provides context on her external environment and how it lead to her placing herself in this unclaimed middle ground within her ethnic community. Part Two: Memoir Still working on a title :/ Imagine a beautiful Saturday morning in the sunny city of San Diego. It 73 degrees, partly cloudy, a perfect day for say, a Frappuccino. Let us go there, to a Starbucks in San Diego. Here I am, behind the counter, serving customers to the best of my ability. I greet customers as they walk in, making conversation, and teasing my regulars about never changing their orders. I am working on the café orders at the espresso machine near the hand-off plane. One white middleaged gentleman comes in, orders his beverage, and stands at the hand-off plane watching my every move. “Hello, sir! How is your day going?” I entertain his silent plea to notice him, trying to wave the awkward tension of him hovering. He doesn’t answer right away, in fact, he never answers my question at all. Instead, “Those are some long eyelashes you’ve got.” Neither an answer to my question nor a compliment. An unwanted statement, but at any rate I say, “Thank you.” Now while I do wear eyelash extensions, the statement seemed almost comical. Like a child pointing at a pregnant woman saying, “Mommy, she has a big tummy.” Use social cues, Captain Obvious. Now I’ve broken eye contact with him and I am working while attempting to hold the conversation. Some more silence along with the hovering and he says, “Are you in school?” To which I reply, “Yes.” Trying to keep it short and sweet at this point, because he has already made me uncomfortable. “Mesa Community?” “I’m currently at San Diego State.” “You’re probably studying, what? A major in communications or something?” This shook me. One, because why on earth would this stranger begin assuming my major? What information does he have to go on besides my physical appearance? Also, what is wrong with majoring in communications? Though he never explicitly said there was anything wrong with the major, it seemed from the beginning he thought little of me from his assumptions and his comments. Still, not making eye contact, busy making drinks, I call out other customer’s names in between this painful conversation. “I’m studying architecture.” I replied, which is technically true as an Urban Studies major, we study a lot of architects and their work. “Ahhhh okay.” His voice faded a bit. “Is this your iced white mocha with no whipped cream?” I am trying to get this man his order so he can proceed with his day and move as far away from me as he can. “Yeah, that’s it.” “Cool! Here’s your white mocha, you’re all set, have a good one.” I say all at once and return to making drinks, still no eye contact. I see from the corner of my eye he exits the store. I roll my eyes and shake my head. Microaggressions are real. While they may be micro, they can really take a toll on your mood, and if you’re not careful, your self-esteem. As a child, I had the luxury of growing up in one of the most diverse cities in the United States: Vallejo, CA. My friend group was as diverse as they come, and it wasn’t until my freshman year of high school that I encountered my first personal experience with imposed black stereotypes. Since the age of five I have played softball and been the only “boy” in a household having four daughters. My dad was always my coach, on and off the field. I played several other sports and was always the daredevil tomboy. One summer, on my travel ball softball team, we had just begun the season and at practice I was told to play left field. We were running drills, and while the infielders were making plays, I hear my center fielder yell “HAAAY SHANAYNAY!” I turn and look, and she is looking directly at me, smiling and waving. I was absolutely clueless as to what she was doing or why she was doing it, so I yell back, “HAAAAY SHANAYNAY!” I smile, and she says it again. I say it back, the exact same tone and everything. I get into the zone of catching pop flies and making plays, I forget all about the episode in the outfield. We finish out the rest of the three-hour practice, and I’m reminded of my teammates remarks as we are packing our bat bags. “Hey, why were you saying ‘Hey Shanaynay’ out there?” I ask. “I was saying ‘hi’. Isn’t that your name?” I start laughing, “What? No! My name’s Delana.” We’re both laughing now, and I am completely oblivious to the gross assumption that is some black stereotypical name. I get home, thinking absolutely nothing of the encounter. After dinner, I’m reminded of it once again, so I tell my parents. As I am sharing the story, I’m laughing as if I’m relaying a funny joke someone told me at the store. My parents’ mood went from amiable to troubled very quickly. When I was finished, their faces left me confused. There was a bit of a silence, and then they told me, “This is not funny. That was not okay for her to assume your name like that. Do you remember Shanaynay from that show, Martin? Is that who you want to be like?” (Shanaynay is a fictional character from a black sit-com who carries out every black stereotype there is: big boobs, big butt, long nails, speaks improperly, always chewing gum, has an attitude, everything! She’s actually played by the male lead comedian, Martin Lawrence, in women’s clothing. She’s ridiculous, honestly, but the show is hilarious). I don’t know if it was the serious mood change, the concerned looked on my parents’ face, or the final realization of just what happened in the outfield, but I began to cry. “No, I don’t wanna be like Shanaynay.” I said through tears. “Don’t let anyone call you that ever. It’s not okay that that is how she sees you. What’s the name of the teammate who called you that?” After the tears, I gave the name of the player who was yelling at me in the outfield. I later learned that they had a talk with that player’s parents. While my mother’s voice was soft and calm, her message hit hard. She gave me a lesson on identity, names, and how important it is that we don’t allow others to reduce us to generalizations and stereotypes, because we are so much more. While we may not be able to singlehandedly change the world and dismantle systematic racism, the beautiful Michelle Obama once said “I can’t make people not afraid of black people. I don’t know what’s going on. I can’t explain what’s happening in [their] head. But maybe if I show up every day as a human, a good human, doing wonderful things, loving my family, loving your kids, taking care of things that I care about — maybe, just maybe that work will pick away at the scabs of your discrimination. Maybe that slowly will unravel it.” From the remarks about our hair or assumptions that we are all angry or violent, or that we can all dance, don’t have a present father, whatever it may be; the small remarks get under our beautiful, melanin coated skin. All we have is the love and kindness in our hearts. If we show up everyday and challenge the sexist, misogynistic, homophobic, or racist stereotypes we can be the change we want to see in the world. That is me, and if this is you, imagine all of the other mes and yous who have experienced silent aggressions. You are far from alone. Reem Hanna Al-Kass S. White RWS 305 February 17, 2020 Part 1: Analysis of Mentor Text Sandra Cisneros is the author of “Only Daughter” which was written in 1995. In the mentor text, she states that she is Mexican, which is an important biographical context to know. Her dad thought it would be a good idea to attend college only so that she can find a husband. This is still common in Mexican families even to this day where they think that daughters are only destined to become someone’s wife. However, in the mid 1990’s it was way more common. Sandra Cisneros’s discourse community she is writing about is daughters (insiders). More specifically, girls’ fathers who have the same mindset as her dad’s (outsiders). She stated that everything she has ever written is for her dad so she can win his approval. She is mainly targeting outsiders so they can understand how many daughters are going through the same thing that she did. What drew me to pick this article as my ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

School: Carnegie Mellon University

Here you go! Let me know if you need any edits or have any questions

Second: Part 1 & 2 Mentor Text Analysis


Part 1: Introduction of context, audience, purpose


--Is the author’s background (historical, political,

The memoir illustrates the use of first person as it

social, cultural etc) explained, if relevant to

describes the life lessons which are aimed at providing

understanding the text?

insights of the importance of learning native language in

--What discourse community the author a part of?

an integrated society. The author also targets the

--What assumption are they trying to challenge about

multilingual societies such as the Latinos and Spaniards

that community?

living in the United States hence; having a wide variety

--WHO is the target audience? Who holds that

of listeners.



--Why do you think it is important to the author to

Provide the importance of being bilingual in a foreign

challenge that assumption?

community which would help in identifying the need to
learn native languages. Also, stating the strategies that
would be implemented to enhance the acquisition of
native languages in the education system would help in
improving bilingualism.




Literary techniques; use of comparison and pathos

o ID 2 literary/creative techniques used
o (you’ll need 2)= quote where it is in the text and
how it is constructed

Evidence is provided based on the use of first person
and life experiences of the author which indicates the
importance of pathos and emotions in describing her life

o How it was designed to engage and interest the
target audience
o Why does it help the author accomplish the

The historical account of the narrator provides the
analysis of her life as a migrant in the United States
which helps the audience in understanding the
complexity of life in a foreign land.
The use of memoir also helps the audience in picturing

purpose—why does it appeal to the target

the life of the immigrants and the importance of learning

audience AND work towards getting them to

native language.

challenge their assumptions?

The narrator should have added information of the
outcomes of learning native languages apart from the
English language.




Using personal experience to get the attention of the

o ID 2 things the author does to appeal to their
audience (DON’T say ethos, pathos, or logos)
o (you’ll need 2)= quote where it is in the text and
what the author is DOING
o What effect was it supposed to have on the

Stating the importance of bilingual in foreign land
The evidence is presented in the first and third page
indicating the difficulties of learning native languages
when they are older.
The analysis involves the use of persuasive words to
help the audience in understanding the purpose of the

audience (this is where you can say ethos,


pathos, or logos)


o Why did the author think it would work, i.e.,

The representation would help the audience in picturing

how did they use knowledge of their audience

the situations in the United States without being

to make this decision?



Why does it help the author accomplish the purpose—
why does it get the audience to rethink their


--What you learned from the mentor text

The use of first person experience in explaining the

--What drew you to the mentor text

importance of bilingualism in foreign countries.

--What techniques/literary devices you’ll try to

The use of memoir and representation also attracted the

recreate/mimic in your memoir

audience in reading the article.
Flashbacks and evaluation of incidences

Quality Control: Grammar/Editing/Wording



flag Report DMCA

Thanks for the help.

Outstanding. Studypool always delivers quality work.

Tutor was very helpful and took the time to explain concepts to me. Very responsive, managed to get replies within the hour.


Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors