University of Miami Musick v Goodyear Case Brief Law Paper

User Generated

fnzvg_01

Writing

University of Miami

Description

For this report, you are to brief the decision in Musick v. Goodyear Tire (Links to an external site.).

Submit a Case Brief on this decision.


Explanation & Answer:
5 pages
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: MUSICK V. GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER COMPANY INC

MUSICK v. GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER COMPANY INC

Student’s Name
Institution Affiliation
Date

1

MUSICK V. GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER COMPANY INC

Case title
MUSICK V. GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER COMPANY INC

519 U.S. 965

No. 96-349

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 04, 1996

Brief facts

The facts of the case were that the plaintiffs, Musick and James Character, who were
employees of Goodyear Tire Rubber Company, had been laid off in a bid to exempt them from
their retirement benefits. They filed separate suits to the District Court, which were later
consolidated and heard as one suit. In their claim, they stated that they had worked for the
company for 19 and 25 years, respectively. They were later recalled to work, but their employer
did not give them credit for purposes of calculating their retirement benefits.

The plaintiffs further added by the actions by their employer were motivated by malice
and were aimed at making sure they were no longer eligible for their retirement benefits. This
was therefore a violation of their labor rights contrary to sec 502 of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The court in dismissing their claim stated that they were
time-barred by the Alabama Limitations of Actions Act, which provided for two years ...


Anonymous
Very useful material for studying!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags