Description
Each Literature Review should include the following sections:
- Provide full citation in MLA (or APA) format
- Provide a brief summary as to what the reading is about
- Give some information on the author(s)
- Identify and define RELEVANT key terms and concepts
- Give three pertinent quotations that might be used in the research paper
- Interpret the meaning of each quotation and explain the significance for the student's project. This might be done by writing a couple of sentences that connect terms and concepts from each quotation to the larger research project
- For the second and subsequent readings, students should write several sentences explaining how the terms and concepts in the quotations connect to previous readings and trace areas of agreement and disagreement about particular topics
- Identify new questions so as to delve even more deeply into the research
Your literature review should demonstrate that you have read the material closely, and that you comprehend it. Furthermore, these Literature Reviews could be of immense use not only in contributing to your body of knowledge about the topic under investigation, but also because sections of your reviews might be incorporated directly into your research paper.
CITATION/AUTHOR INFO 5 POINTS
● Provide full citation in MLA (or APA) format exactly as it will appear on your Works Cited (or References) page.
● Give one sentence of information about who the author/s are to verify that they are a credible and scholarly source.
Remember that the source must be substantive (no short sources), from a scholarly book or journal, and must include references or citations. Zero points given if the source is not scholarly unless I have approved it in advance.
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT, METHODS 15 POINTS
● Summarize the text in your own words and make sure to cover the main argument of the source. Include a description of the methods the author/s used to develop the argument.
KEY TERMS OR CONCEPTS 10 POINTS
● Identify at least TWO important terms or concepts from the reading. Define each one according to how the term is used in the reading. One or both of the terms must be a theoretical framing concept (if the source has no theoretical content it is not likely to be a scholarly source).
QUOTATION ANALYSIS 20 POINTS
● Select three quotations that are important and relevant to your project. Write out each quote, paraphrase its meaning in your own words, and then interpret and analyze it in terms of your own developing argument.
SYNTHESIS 20 POINTS
● For the second and subsequent Source Evaluations, write several sentences of synthesis: Explain specifically how the terms and concepts in the quotations you selected connect to the texts in your previous Source Evaluations, and trace areas of agreement and disagreement between the readings.
OVERALL EVALUATION OF SOURCE 20 POINTS
● Reflect on how the source contributes to your research project. What are its limitations? What are its strengths? How timely is the source?
● What sources does your source use and how does it use them? Might any of those sources be useful to you?
● Identify any new questions you came up with while reading that might guide your future research.
ERROR FREE WRITING 10 POINTS
Your Source Evaluations should demonstrate that you have read the material closely, and that you comprehend how it fits into your own project. These Source Evaluations will be of immense use not only in contributing to your body of knowledge about the topic under investigation, but also because the analytical and synthetic sections of your evaluations might be incorporated directly into your research paper.
the resource:
https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi...
https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/1...
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CONAN-1992...
Explanation & Answer
Hello😊 Here's one of the final copies of your assignment. In case you need any changes made, please let me know, I'll be glad to revise it for you. Attaching the rest shortly, hold on😇
1
Running head: RESPECT AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT
Respect and the Fourth Amendment
Name:
Institution:
Course Code:
RESPECT AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT
The author of the article Respect and the Fourth Amendment, Andrew E. Taslitz,
is a professor at Howard University School of Law and author of five books. The article seeks to
answer the question of why a majority of the minority communities experience rage when they
witness searches and seizures conducted on members of their community. The author’s brief
answer is that police officers act in ways that make these individuals feel disrespected. He adds
that members of the majority community also feel like they are victims of disrespectful searches
and seizures. Individuals of the minority and majority communities have different views of what
is considered respectful and what is disrespectful.
Key terms
Respect is the most important term in this article and is used in the title of the
article. It is used in this reading to refer to the rightful treatment of individuals, which is reflected
across people from all communities. Another term is testilying, which has been used several
times in the reading. It refers to the false testimonies offered by police and is used to fabricate a
case against a defendant. In this article, the term is used to refer to the actions of the police
against the minorities.
Quotations
“Police often perjure themselves at hearings to suppress evidence, a phenomenon
so widespread that it has its name: testilying” (19).
This quote is used to show that the police, in most cases, lie under oath to incriminate a suspect
to remove blame from a suspect.
“And the officers know that judges usually feel the same way” (19).
2
RESPECT AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT
This quote shows that if a case involves the police department because of the Fourth
Amendment, the police and the judges may act in certain ways that may sway the case in their
favor.
“To use the most obvious example, an officer who stops a car going one mile over
the speed limit has probable cause to believe that the law has been violated” (21).
This quote shows one of the instances of probable cause.
Synthesis
This article talks about probable cause, similar to the article on Fourth
Amendment Search and Seizure, which talks about what constitutes a probable cause.
Overall Evaluations
This article acts as a good source of information because the author is credible. It
also gives a different point of view of the subject matter “The Fourth Amendment,” since it
brings in the subject of respect, something that has not been displayed by other sources
discussed.
3
RESPECT AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT
References
Taslitz, A. E. (2003). Respect and the Fourth Amendment. The Journal of Criminal Law and
Criminology (1973-), 94(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.2307/3491304
4
Here, submit this😉
1
Running head: THE CENTRAL MEANING OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT
The Central Meaning of the Fourth Amendment
Name:
Institution:
Course Code:
THE CENTRAL MEANING OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT
The author of this article, Tracey Maclin, received the 1995 Metcalf Award for
Excellence in Teaching at Boston University, where he was a Professor for Law. The article is
divided into five major parts, including an introduction and a conclusion. The second section
talks about whether the Fourth Amendment only requires reasonable police intrusion or if
warrants are the focal point. Here, Maclin looks into the Fourth Amendment based on the two
clauses – the first clause is the Reasonableness Clause, and the second one is the Warrant Clause.
According to the first clause, the police are not necessarily restricted by warrants. The second
clause identifies the form and content of warrants. The third...
Review
Review
