Religion essay help

User Generated

buvbv

Writing

Description


I need someone to rewrite a religion essay that has notes about what's
wrong about it. They are two essays you can make changes as long as
they are correct.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

For res 2 : Compare and contrast Max Weber’s perspective on religion to that of Emil Durkheim. Both theorists are leading figures in the discipline of Sociology, yet their approach to the study of religion differs. Write an essay that is sensitive to both similarities and dissimilarities in their thought in regard to religion. The essay needs an introductory paragraph that introduces your thesis statement (that is ideas/concepts of the two theorists that will be addressed) and a concluding paragraph that summarizes your argument in the paper. Your paper is to be two pages (or more), double-spaced with 1 inch margins. Utilize the checklist to make sure your paper meets all the criteria that are required. This checklist was given to you at the beginning of the semester and is available on Blackboard Religion from a Theological Academic Perspective . Some of the most critical sociologists in matters of religion include: Durkheim and Weber. These two sociologists developed individual theories of concern to the issue of religion. It is through these theories that we understand the notion of religion. However, it is worth noting that both sociologists held some similarities as well as differences in describing the concept of religion and its uses in the society. According to Durkheim, religious phenomena materialize in any culture after a separation is made between the fields of the profane (everyday activities) and the sphere of the sacred. One perception of religion is the expression of communal consciousness. It is a combination of individual conscious that forms a reality of its own (Durkheim 34). He argues that those communities which are less intricate in nature have less complex religion while for those with are more multifaceted will have simple religious systems. This forms the notion that religion and nature are two intertwined aspects. In this case, a strong believe in the supernatural leads to a stronger religion and vice versa. On the other hand Weber majors in working on examining how religious groups and views interrelate with other features of social life, especially the economy.. The two thinkers had some similarities in their views on religion. The two thinkers used capitalism and the era of Industrial revolution to base their theories on religion. Additionally both observed religion as a reflection of the society instead of a supernatural certainty. Durkheim argued that God was not only the glorification of human nature, but of society as a whole according to him God and the society played the same purposeful rule , that is the role which an 2 individual must depend on a superior being (Durkheim 18). On the other hand Weber had a related concept of religion. He argued that the symbols of religion appeared to symbolize preexisting political systems. Both thinkers used the early history of human culture to form hypothesis about religion. Arguably, this extends the concept of religion and connects it to culture as well as to the society. Moreover both scholars studied religion as a scientific study (Durkheim 46). The science in Durkheim principles on moral effects of religion while as for Weber centered on the effects of religion on economic part of life. Even though the two had similarities in their arguments about religion they also had their share of differences on the same. This includes their individual versus holistic approach on religion theories. Weber stated that a religious person would in order to better himself and in return obtain favor before god and in the life after death (Weber 37). On the contrary social solidarity formed the basis for teachings on religion by Durkheim. He invented that the function of religion was not to make us believe about the nature of this world or the “other world” but it was to a certain extent to telling us how to act and how to live in the community and in the real world (Weber 15). In Weber’s hypothesis of religion the group was not an integral part. To him individuals formed societies. While to Durkheim the society created the individual. Durkheim saw religion as a way that the society uses to create order via moral regulation. In dissimilarity, Weber, on the other hand, observed that the religious experience was a highly individual experience and argued that humans found subjective meaning to life through individual religious experience. In conclusion, both Weber and Durkheim clearly explained their individual stances regarding the notion of religion. As both sociologists argue, religion and society go hand in hand and this makes the two notions inseparable. Through this, we deduce the fact that there cannot be 3 religion without the society and it would be true to also say that as long as people believe in something supernatural then there will always be religion. As such, the description of the supernatural and religion are two aspects which are bound together. However, not all humans can religious and at the same time not all of them can atheists. Religion basically is formed on morals whether society or individual and it has a key crucial role in the society. The majority of the paper is very awkward and unclear. You also left out almost all of the important concepts which we covered such as totemism, sacred/profane, secularization/modernization theses, the three ideal types, and the Protestant Ethic. I recommend taking your papers to the Writing Center as well to help better organize and phrase your papers. Font: 1/1 Title: 1/1 Length: 1/1 Grammar: 2/7 Introduction: 3/3 Comparison: 2/10 Conclusion: 2/2 Total: 12/25 Work cited 4 Durkheim, E., & Swain, J. W. The elementary forms of the religious life. Courier Corporation. (2008). Weber, M. The sociology of religion. Beacon Press. (2010) For res 2 : Compare and contrast Max Weber’s perspective on religion to that of Emil Durkheim. Both theorists are leading figures in the discipline of Sociology, yet their approach to the study of religion differs. Write an essay that is sensitive to both similarities and dissimilarities in their thought in regard to religion. The essay needs an introductory paragraph that introduces your thesis statement (that is ideas/concepts of the two theorists that will be addressed) and a concluding paragraph that summarizes your argument in the paper. Your paper is to be two pages (or more), double-spaced with 1 inch margins. Utilize the checklist to make sure your paper meets all the criteria that are required. This checklist was given to you at the beginning of the semester and is available on Blackboard Religion from a Theological Academic Perspective . Some of the most critical sociologists in matters of religion include: Durkheim and Weber. These two sociologists developed individual theories of concern to the issue of religion. It is through these theories that we understand the notion of religion. However, it is worth noting that both sociologists held some similarities as well as differences in describing the concept of religion and its uses in the society. According to Durkheim, religious phenomena materialize in any culture after a separation is made between the fields of the profane (everyday activities) and the sphere of the sacred. One perception of religion is the expression of communal consciousness. It is a combination of individual conscious that forms a reality of its own (Durkheim 34). He argues that those communities which are less intricate in nature have less complex religion while for those with are more multifaceted will have simple religious systems. This forms the notion that religion and nature are two intertwined aspects. In this case, a strong believe in the supernatural leads to a stronger religion and vice versa. On the other hand Weber majors in working on examining how religious groups and views interrelate with other features of social life, especially the economy.. The two thinkers had some similarities in their views on religion. The two thinkers used capitalism and the era of Industrial revolution to base their theories on religion. Additionally both observed religion as a reflection of the society instead of a supernatural certainty. Durkheim argued that God was not only the glorification of human nature, but of society as a whole according to him God and the society played the same purposeful rule , that is the role which an 2 individual must depend on a superior being (Durkheim 18). On the other hand Weber had a related concept of religion. He argued that the symbols of religion appeared to symbolize preexisting political systems. Both thinkers used the early history of human culture to form hypothesis about religion. Arguably, this extends the concept of religion and connects it to culture as well as to the society. Moreover both scholars studied religion as a scientific study (Durkheim 46). The science in Durkheim principles on moral effects of religion while as for Weber centered on the effects of religion on economic part of life. Even though the two had similarities in their arguments about religion they also had their share of differences on the same. This includes their individual versus holistic approach on religion theories. Weber stated that a religious person would in order to better himself and in return obtain favor before god and in the life after death (Weber 37). On the contrary social solidarity formed the basis for teachings on religion by Durkheim. He invented that the function of religion was not to make us believe about the nature of this world or the “other world” but it was to a certain extent to telling us how to act and how to live in the community and in the real world (Weber 15). In Weber’s hypothesis of religion the group was not an integral part. To him individuals formed societies. While to Durkheim the society created the individual. Durkheim saw religion as a way that the society uses to create order via moral regulation. In dissimilarity, Weber, on the other hand, observed that the religious experience was a highly individual experience and argued that humans found subjective meaning to life through individual religious experience. In conclusion, both Weber and Durkheim clearly explained their individual stances regarding the notion of religion. As both sociologists argue, religion and society go hand in hand and this makes the two notions inseparable. Through this, we deduce the fact that there cannot be 3 religion without the society and it would be true to also say that as long as people believe in something supernatural then there will always be religion. As such, the description of the supernatural and religion are two aspects which are bound together. However, not all humans can religious and at the same time not all of them can atheists. Religion basically is formed on morals whether society or individual and it has a key crucial role in the society. The majority of the paper is very awkward and unclear. You also left out almost all of the important concepts which we covered such as totemism, sacred/profane, secularization/modernization theses, the three ideal types, and the Protestant Ethic. I recommend taking your papers to the Writing Center as well to help better organize and phrase your papers. Font: 1/1 Title: 1/1 Length: 1/1 Grammar: 2/7 Introduction: 3/3 Comparison: 2/10 Conclusion: 2/2 Total: 12/25 Work cited 4 Durkheim, E., & Swain, J. W. The elementary forms of the religious life. Courier Corporation. (2008). Weber, M. The sociology of religion. Beacon Press. (2010)
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Name:
Course:
Tutor:
Date:


Understanding
religion from a theological and academic perspective.



The
issue of religion brings on board an array of authors with different views
concerning the relevance of the religion of their interest. The single most
important thing in this case is their willingness and stance to go for academic
aspect of religion, which typically revolves around what is referred to as
theology. The main focus of this essay is to show how religion is being
understood in both theological and academic points.

Overview

A
wider difference exists between the two doctrines used to approach the aspect
of religion, with both theology and religious studies standing out as the two
commonly adopted perspectives. As much as those two disciplines are closely
related, there exists a wide difference from several perspectives.

Religious
studies covers different beliefs,...


Anonymous
Just what I needed. Studypool is a lifesaver!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags