TaskCompose an 6-8 page researched essay that develops a clear and well-supported argument on a specific social justice issue, where the writer (you) addresses the root cause/origin of the issue, provides historical context, takes a stance on the issue and considers possible solutions. Possible Topics:You might choose from the following topics, as these are all central to the current times. ***If you would like to work on a topic not listed below, please email me for approval. List of OptionsTopic CategorySpecific IssueAnti-racism· Black Lives Matter vs. All Lives Matter· Police Brutality· Black Minds Matter· Reparations for slaveryCOVID-19· Economic impacts· Racial inequities· Impacts on unemploymentHealthcare· Universal healthcare· Public/Private insurance options· Prescription DrugsImmigration· DACA· Border Security· Travel Ban· ICE· Illegal ImmigrationLGBTQ+ Issues· Same-sex marriage· LGBTQ+ in the military· Equality Act· Hate crimesEducation· Tuition Relief· Affirmative Action· Funding for education· Debt relief/Student Loan Forgiveness Criminal Justice· Racial inequities· Private prisons· Mandatory minimum sentencing· Legalization of marijuana· Capital Punishment· Supreme Court Justice Replacement for Ruth Bader GinsburgMore Specifically:Your essay should identify a social issue that is central to the current times.Your essay should include research on the possible origin and/or cause of the social issue. Your job is to look into the historical context from which the social issue emerged.Your essay should include your stance on the social issue with evidence to support your reasoning and thorough analysis of how the evidence supports your reasoning.Your essay should include five (5) credible sources that you select.At least two (2) sources must be located through the library’s databasesWikipedia is NOT an acceptable source.Your essay should be well-structured with a clear beginning, middle, and end.Below is a list of components to include:Introduction: introduce and familiarize your reader with the social issue you plan to tackle/analyze/complicateHistory: research the origin and/or root cause of your chosen single story.Argument: provide evidence to support your stance on the issue. You must also include a counterargument and rebuttal to make your argument more well-rounded.Conclusion: explain the significance of the work you have just completed. Why is it important that we talk about your social issue? What are possible solutions to the problem?Required ReadingFor this essay, you will be researching and selecting all of your own readings and sources. You are required to find and cite a minimum of five sources, and two of those sources should be from the Cuyamaca College Library Databases. (Links to an external site.)Suggested Outline:IntroductionHookContextualize social issue (background)Thesis: your stance on your social issueBody 1: Origin/Root Cause: What is the earliest moment in history where your issue was a problem? And/or what is the root cause of your issue?Body 2: Historical Moments over time: How has your issue played out historically? Where, in history, can we see it being a problem. Body 3 Argument in PIEIE Structure: First reason to support your thesis Body 4 Argument in PIEIE Structure: Second reason to support your thesisBody 5 Argument in PIEIE Structure: Third reason to support your thesisConclusion: Overall significance of your stance on your social issue: why does your topic/stance matter for your readers? What should readers do as a result of reading your paper?

You must answer the following:1) With reference to any of TWO of the following, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZIJZMS5BUQhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyYjI7zQlaAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8VXyfcs0l0https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdeHUrL1FEMuse concepts/arguments from any article/presentation covered in the course to critically analyze THREE aspects of/arguments raised within the two videos you choose. To be clear, you should therefore be raising a total of six aspects of/arguments raised (implicitly or explicitly) within the two videos you choose (three for each video). Critical analysis entails connecting concepts clearly to aspects of the documentary/video and raising objections, counter-objections, and attempts at responses to issues/arguments raised by the anticipated counter-objections.Answer one of the following:2a) With reference to “American Disenlightenment, or Climate Change Made in the USA,” (i) reformulate the piece into premises and a conclusion. (ii) Elaborate two counter-objections not anticipated/mentioned/covered in the piece itself. (iii) Anticipate two counter-objections to each of the counter-objections you raise in (ii) and, (iv), attempt to then defend the counter-objections raised in (ii) from objections raised in (iii) without merely restating the arguments of (ii) or arguments from the piece itself.2b) With reference to “Saved by Disaster? Abrupt Climate Change, Political Inertia, and the Possibility of an Intergenerational Arms Race,” (i) reformulate the piece into premises and a conclusion. (ii) Elaborate two counter-objections not anticipated/mentioned/covered in the piece itself. (iii) Anticipate two counter-objections to each of the counter-objections you raise in (ii) and, (iv), attempt to then defend the counter-objections raised in (ii) from objections raised in (iii) without merely restating the arguments of (ii) or arguments from the piece itself.2c) With reference to “Can the Supply of Natural Resources Really Be Infinite? Yes!,” (i) reformulate the piece into premises and a conclusion. (ii) Elaborate two counter-objections not anticipated/mentioned/covered in the piece itself. (iii) Anticipate two counter-objections to each of the counter-objections you raise in (ii) and, (iv), attempt to then defend the counter-objections raised in (ii) from objections raised in (iii) without merely restating the arguments of (ii) or arguments from the piece itself.2d) With reference to “Why Put a Value on Biodiversity?,” (i) reformulate the piece into premises and a conclusion. (ii) Elaborate two counter-objections not anticipated/mentioned/covered in the piece itself. (iii) Anticipate two counter-objections to each of the counter-objections you raise in (ii) and, (iv), attempt to then defend the counter-objections raised in (ii) from objections raised in (iii) without merely restating the arguments of (ii) or arguments from the piece itself.2e) With reference to “Sustainability and Sense of Place,” (i) reformulate the piece into premises and a conclusion. (ii) Elaborate two counter-objections not anticipated/mentioned/covered in the piece itself. (iii) Anticipate two counter-objections to each of the counter-objections you raise in (ii) and, (iv), attempt to then defend the counter-objections raised in (ii) from objections raised in (iii) without merely restating the arguments of (ii) or arguments from the piece itself.2f) With reference to “The Concept of 'Sustainability,” (i) reformulate the piece into premises and a conclusion. (ii) Elaborate two counter-objections not anticipated/mentioned/covered in the piece itself. (iii) Anticipate two counter-objections to each of the counter-objections you raise in (ii) and, (iv), attempt to then defend the counter-objections raised in (ii) from objections raised in (iii) without merely restating the arguments of (ii) or arguments from the piece itself.2g) With reference to "Ecofeminists Without Borders: The Power of Method,” (i) reformulate the piece into premises and a conclusion. (ii) Elaborate two counter-objections not anticipated/mentioned/covered in the piece itself. (iii) Anticipate two counter-objections to each of the counter-objections you raise in (ii) and, (iv), attempt to then defend the counter-objections raised in (ii) from objections raised in (iii) without merely restating the arguments of (ii) or arguments from the piece itself.2h) With reference to Section C "Sustainability and Substitutionality" (pp. 381-386 of the textbook), (i) reformulate the piece into premises and a conclusion. (ii) Elaborate two counter-objections not anticipated/mentioned/covered in the piece itself. (iii) Anticipate two counter-objections to each of the counter-objections you raise in (ii) and, (iv), attempt to then defend the counter-objections raised in (ii) from objections raised in (iii) without merely restating the arguments of (ii) or arguments from the piece itself.