Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
Structured Assignment
For BUSINESS ETHICS (PHIL 3108)
Semester 2 of Academic Year 2019-2020
Shinas College of Technology
Department of Business Studies
Course Name:
Business Ethics
Course Code:
Max Marks
PHIL 3108
15
Group Size
Min 3 to Max 4
Level -Diploma
Academic Year: 2018-19, Semester: 2
Date of Assignment: 23/01/2020
Outcome Coverage
Assignment Title
Contents
Specialization: Business, IT, Engineering
Date of Submission: 31/03/2020
1-6
Application of Ethics in real life scenario.
PART A
Use college library resources for answering the questions given below:
Resources
Students Learning
1. Select any one case study under the foundations
of Business Ethics and write appropriate solutions
to solve them and answer the questions.
2. Select any one case study under Individual
Rights and Business Organizations and answer the
questions given as per the selected case study.
Business Ethics, case studies and selected
readings. 5th Edition by Marianne Moody
Jennings.(Page 37 to 59)
Will be able to make critical
ethical decision during dilemma
stage.
Business Ethics, case studies and selected
readings. 5th Edition by Marianne Moody
Jennings.(153 to 243)
Will be able to come out with
variety of choice to overcome
those difficult situations.
Total
PART B - Presentation
You are required to make a presentation for a Maximum of 15 Minutes for the above selected case studies in Part A.
Marks
5
5
10
Marks
1. All Members of the group should make the presentation.
2. PPT slides should not be more than 10 slides.
Total (Part A+B)
5
15
Rubric for Presentation
Weight Elements
1
Organization
and Content
(Introduction,
body and
conclusion)
Excellent
Knowledge of content
and includes an
engaging introduction,
detailed body and
memorable conclusion
(1)
Makes eye contact
with everyone in the
audience
(1)
Good
Knowledge of content
and includes an
introduction, detailed
body and conclusion
(0.75)
1
Eye Contact
0.5
Volume and
Clarity
(Loudness,
articulation and
mumbling)
The audience in the
back can hear the
speech very clearly
and the voice is
audible. (0.25)
The speaker mumbles
a bit, but audience in
the back can hear most
of the speech and the
voice is almost audible
(0.2)
0.5
Flow
(Pauses and
verbal fillers;
um, uh, ok)
Confidence and
Attitude
The speech flows
nicely with no pauses
or distracting verbal
fillers (0.25)
Speak with
enthusiasm poise and
assurance (0.25)
The visual aid/PPT
compliments the
speech and is neat,
colorful and creative
(1)
The speech includes 1
to 2 pauses and a few
verbal fillers (0.20)
Speech is given in the
time allotted (0.25)
Speech is 10% short or
over the allotted time
(0.20)
0.5
1
Visual Aid/PPT
0.5
Time
Makes eye contact
with most everyone in
the audience
(0.75)
Mostly speaks with
enthusiasm, poise and
assurance (0.20)
The visual aid/PPT
connects to the speech
and is mostly neat,
colorful and creative
(0.75)
Fair
Somewhat
knowledgeable of
content and is
missing an
introduction, body or
conclusion (0.5)
Makes eye contact
with some of the
people in the
audience
(0.5)
The speaker
mumbles some and
the audience in the
back can hear parts
of the speech and the
voice somewhat
audible. (0.15)
The speech includes
some distracting
pauses and some
verbal fillers (0.15)
Speaks with some
enthusiasm, poise
and assurance (0.15)
The visual aid
somewhat connects
to the speech and is
somewhat neat,
colorful and creative
(0.5)
Speech is 20% short
or over the allotted
time (0.15)
Needs Improvement
Some content facts seem
questionable and is missing an
introduction, body and or
conclusion (0.25 and below)
Makes very little or no eye
contact with people in the
audience (0.25)
The speaker consistently
mumbles so that the people in
the back cannot hear the speech
and the voice is not audible
(below 0.1)
Speech includes several
distracting pauses and many
verbal fillers (below 0.1)
Speaks with little or no
enthusiasm, poise and/or
assurance (below 0.1)
The visual aid does not connect
to the speech and is messy,
lacks color and creativity
(below 0.25)
Speech is 30% short or over the
allotted time (0.1)
Score
Grading Rubric for Writing Assignment
Main idea and
Purpose (2 Marks)
Organization:
Overall
Organization:
Paragraphs (2
marks)
Content (2 marks)
Research (2 marks)
Style: Sentence
structure, Details and
Examples (2 marks)
A
Clearly presents a main
idea and supports it
throughout the paper.
Purpose is clear (2)
Well-planned and wellthought out. Includes title,
introduction, statement of
main idea, transitions and
conclusion. All paragraphs
have clear ideas, are
supported with examples
and have smooth
transitions. (2)
Exceptionally wellpresented and argued; ideas
are detailed, welldeveloped, supported with
specific evidence & facts,
as well as examples and
specific details. (2)
Sources are exceptionally
well-integrated and they
support claims argued in
the paper very effectively.
Quotations and Works
Cited conform to standard
style. (2)
Sentences are clear and
varied in pattern, from
simple to complex, with
excellent use of
punctuation. Large
amounts of specific
examples and detailed
descriptions. (2)
B
There is a main idea supported
throughout most of the paper.
Shows awareness of purpose.
(1.5)
Good overall organization,
includes the main organizational
tools.
Most paragraphs have clear
ideas, are supported with some
examples and have transitions.
(1.5)
C
Vague sense of a main idea, weakly
supported throughout the paper.
Shows limited awareness of purpose
(1)
There is a sense of organization,
although some of the organizational
tools are used weakly or missing
Some paragraphs have clear ideas,
support from examples may be
missing and transitions are weak
(1)
D
No main idea. No awareness
(0.5)
Well-presented and argued;
ideas are detailed, developed
and supported with evidence
and details, mostly specific. (1.5)
Content is sound and solid; ideas are Content is not sound. (0.5)
present but not particularly
developed or supported; some
evidence, but usually of a
generalized nature. (1)
Sources are well integrated and
support the paper’s claims.
There may be occasional errors,
but the sources and Works Cited
conform to standard style.
(1.5)
Sources support some claims made
in the paper, but might not be
integrated well within the paper’s
argument. There may be a few
errors in style. (1)
Sentences are clear but may lack
variation; a few may be
awkward and there may be a
few punctuation errors. Some
use of specific examples and
detailed descriptions. (1.5)
Sentences are generally clear but
may have awkward structure or
unclear content; there may be
patterns of punctuation errors. Little
use of specific examples and details.
(1)
No sense of organization
lack clear ideas (0.5)
The paper does not use
adequate research or if it does,
the sources are not integrated
well. They are not cited
correctly according to style, nor
listed correctly on the Works
Cited page. (0.5)
Sentences aren’t clear. No use
of examples. (0.5)
Submission:
“The assignment/project report needs to be uploaded to the e-learning either as MS Word or PDF file. The report needs to be revised
based on the comments received. The third draft will be considered as final and will be graded based on Content, Originality, and
other course grading rubrics (please check for report evaluation rubrics).”
Late Submission of Assignment
20% of assignment scored mark will be reduced for each day of late submission.
Referencing
Referencing or citing the sources used for your assignment is an important part of academic writing. It is a way of acknowledging the ideas or words
of others if you use them in your work and helps avoid plagiarism. It is evidence that you have read relevant background literature and you can
provide authority for statements you make in your assignments. The Harvard Citation Style is the most common style of referencing; hence, you are
suggested to use it for referencing the sources you have used in your assignment or project. Please refer below link for more details:
http://www.staffs.ac.uk/assets/harvard_referencing_examples_tcm44-39847.pdf.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism occurs when other’s work such as print material, images, audio-visual creations, computer programs, electronic materials, etc. are
used without appropriate acknowledgement. Plagiarism includes, but not limited to, the following:
Copying full or part (paragraphs, sentences or significant part of a sentence) of other’s work directly
Copying from other’s work with an end reference to the original source but without putting the copied text between quotation marks
Paraphrasing, summarizing or rearranging words, phrases or ideas of other’s work
Copy-Paste of statements from multiple sources (electronic or print material)
Presenting a work, done in collaboration with others, as independent work
Using one’s own work presented previously
Disciplinary Action for Student Plagiarism is Zero mark
The assignment draft will be checked for similarity through Turnitin.
Students are given the chance to lodge their appeal against the sanctions to the Head of Department.
Prepared by:
Approved by:
Mr. Muhammad Imthiyaz Ahmed
Course Lecturer/Coordinator
Ms. Khadija Al-Issaei
HOS – HR Section
Section Course Lecturers:
Mr. Subhash
Mr. Shafi
Mr. Mohammed Kalati
Dr. Renjith
Ms.Juvy
Dr. Sabura
Mr. Narsaiah
Mr. Soofi
Mr. Reynald
Purchase answer to see full
attachment