University of Phoenix Significance of Charismatic Leadership Style Paper


University of Phoenix

Question Description

Assignment Content

  1. Prepare a 1,050 word paper that compares these leadership styles: charismatic, transnational, and trans-formative Discuss the characteristics of each, their similarities and differences, and the potential pitfalls of each. You should discuss the significance each style places on vision and communication.Format your paper according to APA standards.Submit your assignment.

Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Final Answer



Leadership Styles
Name of Student
Name of institution




Characteristics, disadvantages, and significance of charismatic leadership style
There are different types of leadership styles that managers may adopt in their diverse
organization, depending on the goals and objectives that they want to achieve. For starters, let’s
start with charismatic leaders and their different qualities. Besides, when it comes to groups
settings, the leaders are comfortable communicating. Another characteristic is that they are wise
and knowledgeable when it comes to business and life experiences (Shamir & Howell, 2018).
Additionally, they have a sense of humility, which enables them to listen to the concerns of their
staff keenly. Therefore, they are able to positively influence the strategic interest of the company
while at the same time convincing employees to bring value to the organization, thus inspiring
Compassionate is another character trait of charismatic leaders. Therefore, they ensure to
lead by example by walking their talk. Confidence and security enable charismatic leaders to
have a positive body language. Thus, they have an easier time introducing themselves to
strangers and show authenticity (Shamir & Howell, 2018). Charismatic leaders are empathetic,
an attribute that enables them to have a powerful personality that commands respect and attract
followers. Another characteristic is that they are self-monitoring, thus continually look for a way
to improve themselves to become better leaders.
On the flip side, the charismatic leadership style has some drawbacks. The first challenge
is feeling too much pressure on the part of the followers who wholeheartedly look up to them for
direction. Thus, staffs associate company success only with the leader even though it should be
part of every staff involved. Besides, the leader has to keep a balance between motivating his



employees and running the company simultaneously (Shamir & Howell, 2018). Another con is
that the leadership style may not always win the employees to buy into the leader's intentions. In
the long-run employees are able to discern that the leader is concerned more about their success,
especially in cases where they are not knowledgeable about a company mission and objectives.
Additionally, the leadership style blinds a manager that they are not able to foresee risks
in the firm. Thus, in financial welfare, a manager may cost the company since their confidence
makes them feel that the success of the company is indefinite (Shamir & Howell, 2018). Due to
over-confidence on the part of the leaders, they end having a hard time designating control since
they are not confident with other abilities to accomplish the task. Therefore, this is risky for the
firm if they happen to lose the manager since it leaves the organization without knowledgeable
successors. In the long run, the vision of the company ...

University of Virginia

I use Studypool every time I need help studying, and it never disappoints.

Similar Questions
Related Tags