1. Write a 4 page APA Style paper describing the American legal system. Describe the branches of our government, the types of laws, and our court system. 2. Answer the following questions for a, b, c and dUlysses S. Grant (USG) is a nonprofit HMO that is preparing a premium bid for Stewart Martha Inc. (SMI), a major employer in USG's service area with 2,500 members. USG uses the cost approach to estimate primary care physician's costs for SMI's members. On average, each member makes two visits to a primary care physician per year, and each primary care physician can handle 2,000 patient visits per year. Total compensation per primary care physician is $150,000 per year.a. SMI has obtained primary care bids from other HMOs in the other area and has told USG that it can have the primary care contract for a PMPM premium of $13.00. Should USG accept the contract? Suppose that each member makes 2.6 visits to a primary care physician per year. Should USG accept the contract?b. Suppose that the average of two visits to a primary care physician per year is a weighted average of two groups of SMI members–a small group with a chronic disease that requires a higher frequency of visits and a large group without a chronic disease that requires a lower frequency of visits: NumberAverage primary care visits per yearMembers without chronic disease2,4001.58Members with chronic disease10012.08Total2,5002.00Compare the primary care cost per member per month of the group of SMI members without a chronic disease to the group with a chronic disease. What information do these two numbers provide?c. The primary care physicians believe they are overworked and underpaid. Their association is demanding that the total compensation per primary care physician be increased and the expected workload of each primary care physician be reduced. Management believes that the following settlements are possible: Total comp per MD per yearVisits per MD per yearBest case$160,0001,900Most likely case$170,0001,800Worst case$180,0001,700Should USG still accept the contract?d. Suppose USG decides to submit a premium bid to MSI of $40 PMPM for both primary and specialty physicians. The primary care physicians will be paid $13 PMPM; the specialty physicians will be paid on a discounted fee-for-service basis. To create proper incentives, USG establishes a professional services risk pool equal to 15 percent of the budget for specialist physicians. After reconciliation at the end of the year, any funds left in the risk pool are evenly split among all primary care physicians. If the actual payments to the specialist physicians total $720,000 during the year, what would a primary care physician's actual PMPM be after reconciliation at the end of the year?

The purpose of this assignment is to create an educational program that supports the implementation of risk management strategies in a health care organization.In this assignment, you will develop an outline for an "in‐service"‐style educational risk management program for employees of a particular health care organization. Select your topic for this educational session from one of the proposed recommendations or changes you suggested in the Risk Management Program Analysis – Part One assignment to enhance, improve, or secure compliance standards in your chosen risk management plan example. PLEASE CHOOSE A TOPIC FROM THE DOCUMENT I ATTACHED. Create a 500‐750-word comprehensive outline that communicates the following about your chosen topic:Introduction: Identify the risk management topic you have chosen to address and why it is important within your health care sector.Rationale: Illustrate how this risk management strategy is lacking within your selected organization's current risk management plan and explain how its implementation will better meet local, state, and federal compliance standards.Support: Provide data that indicate the need for this proposed risk management initiative and demonstrate how it falls under the organization's legal responsibility to provide a safe health care facility and work environment.Implementation: Describe the steps to implement the proposed strategy in your selected health care organization.Challenges: Predict obstacles the health care organization may face in executing this risk management strategy and propose solutions to navigate or preempt these potentially difficult outcomes.Evaluation: Outline your plan to evaluate the success of the proposed risk management program and how well it meets the organization's short-term, long-term, and end goals.Opportunities: Recommend additional risk management improvements in adjacent areas of influence that the organization could or should address moving forward.You are required to support your statements with a minimum of SIX citations from appropriate credible sources.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

Unit 7 Assignment - Leadership PortfolioSubmit AssignmentDue Sunday by 11:59pm Points 90 Submitting a text entry box or a file uploadEstimated time to complete: 90 minutesInstructionsWork through the "Encourage the Heart" section of the textbook, including review questions at the end of Chapters 11-13.Complete items 12 and Final Reflection in your "My Leadership Portfolio" document.Upload your completed "My Leadership Portfolio" document. Ensure all items are completed.RubricHC402 Unit 7 Assignment - Leadership PortfolioHC402 Unit 7 Assignment - Leadership PortfolioCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent30.0 ptsLevel 5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.27.0 ptsLevel 4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.24.0 ptsLevel 3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.21.0 ptsLevel 2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.18.0 ptsLevel 1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is no evidence of a defined statement.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P50.0 ptsLevel 5Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.45.0 ptsLevel 4Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.40.0 ptsLevel 3Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.35.0 ptsLevel 2Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.30.0 ptsLevel 1Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.0.0 ptsLevel 0Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.50.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting10.0 ptsLevel 5The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.9.0 ptsLevel 4The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.8.0 ptsLevel 3The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.7.0 ptsLevel 2The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.6.0 ptsLevel 1The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 ptsLevel 0The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.10.0 ptsTotal Points: 90.0