Business Finance
MGT 312 SEU Decision Making & Problem Solving Basic Intuition Article Discussion

mgt 312

Saudi electronic university


Question Description

I’m trying to learn for my Management class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

no matching ratio

The application of the conditions contained in the Assignment

A typical, clear and complete method of solution

Unformatted Attachment Preview

College of Administrative and Financial Sciences MGT 312 Assignment 2 Deadline: End of Week 10, 26/03/2020 @ 23:59 Course Name: Decision Making and Problem Solving Student’s Name: Course Code: MGT 312 Student’s ID Number: Semester: I CRN: Academic Year: 1440/1441 H For Instructor’s Use only Instructor’s Name: Students’ Grade: Marks Obtained/Out of Level of Marks: High/Middle/Low Instructions – PLEASE READ THEM CAREFULLY  The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder.  Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted.  Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be reduced for poor presentation. This includes filling your information on the cover page.  Students must mention question number clearly in their answer.  Late submission will NOT be accepted.  Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions.  All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).  Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted. Course Learning Outcomes-Covered  Explain critical thinking and cognitive psychology as it pertains to analyze and synthesize information for problem solving and decision making. (2.7)  Employ and analyze aspects of creativity as they pertain to problem solving and decision making in all manners and circumstances. (2.3)  Demonstrate effective leadership skills and teamwork capacity for efficient decision making as either team member or a team leader. (3.4 & 3.5) Assignment Instructions:  Log in to Saudi Digital Library (SDL) via University’s website  On first page of SDL, choose “English Databases”  From the list find and click on EBSCO database.  In the search bar of EBSCO find the following article: Title: “3 Simple habits to improve your critical thinking” Author: Helen Lee Bouygues Date of Publication: May 6, 2019 Published: Harvard Business Review Assignment Questions: (Marks 10) 1. Read the attached article titled as “3 Simple habits to improve your critical thinking” by Helen Lee Bouygues, published in Harvard Business Review, and answer the following Questions: a. Summarize the article and explain the main issues discussed in the article. (In 600-700 words) b. What do you think about the article in relations to what you have learned in the course about how to improve your critical thinking? Use additional reference to support you argument. (In 200-400 words) c. What do you understand by groupthink? According to the article how we can prevent people from engaging in groupthink. Use additional reference to support you argument. (In 150-300 words) d. “Critical thinking is the opposite of creative thinking.” Do you agree? Provide examples of why you agree or disagree. (In 200-300 words) [Please answer in the next page] Answers ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Final Answer


Assignment Three
Course Code:
March 25, 2020

Question One

The article talks the three main fundamental propensities to improve basic intuition by
Helen Lee Bouygues. The author notes that the absence of basic reasoning is the critical reason
behind the various business frustrations. Basic reasoning is fundamental for the business
accomplishment. The leader should start by leading through example. Everyone ought to
fundamentally consider the issues they stood up to and a short time later take the potential plans.
Individuals with basic reasoning live reasonably. Helen Lee Bouygues, chief, and CEO of the
Reboot Society empowered gatherings in debate to move their brains over two decades. By
building up their systematic idea, she tells others the best way to adapt to relational issues. "Such
a significant number of corporate pioneers simply don't think or set aside the effort to look at a
point from the two edges," Lee Bouygues said. Leaders as often as possible draw the primary
presumption, independent of realities.' These suspicions can prompt lessening salary, missed
customers, and poor camaraderie. The positive news is an aced part of intelligent idea. Three
simple examples can be worked by everybody to upgrade their expository reasoning.
Don’t assume: Lee Bouygues urges organization officials to test their decisions while a
lot is on the line. This doesn't recommend that you consider once more, yet rather that you
twofold check the establishments of your feelings. At the point when a market store expects that
its customers can get beyond what they can, they can overrate items and lose millions in income.
That is when "shrouded customers" or exposure examination gets helpful. You should develop
this system on proof, not on your own partialities while you're plunking down to make a long
haul plan for the business. Reason Through Logic: About 2000 years prior, Aristotle ...

Mercury_H (10035)
Rice University

I was on a very tight deadline but thanks to Studypool I was able to deliver my assignment on time.

The tutor was pretty knowledgeable, efficient and polite. Great service!

I did not know how to approach this question, Studypool helped me a lot.

Similar Questions
Related Tags