USF Science in Cultural Context The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Discussion

University of South Florida

Question Description

I’m working on a Philosophy exercise and need support.

These were the assigned readings and we are to pick one and write about:

The Scientific Background to Modern Philosophy (Aristotle, Copernicus, Bacon, Galileo)

Structure of Scientific Revolutions , Kuhn (history and normal science, puzzles and paradigms)

Scientific Process, Levine. (intelligent design vs revolution)

Unformatted Attachment Preview

1 Science in Cultural Context - Paper 1 Instructions Grade: Part of your overall grade is to complete two papers, each worth 10 percent. You are to turn Paper 1 in through the plagiarism detector on Canvas before March 15 at 11:59 PM. Only include a title, and begin on the second line. The paper should be 12 point font, times new roman, and double spaced with standard 1 inch margins. It must be approximately 2-3 pages, and you can go over the page limit if you need to, but focus on concision. See syllabus for further instructions. Purpose and Topic: Basically, you are to choose one of our required readings. The choice is up to you—pick something you enjoyed, hated, were skeptical about, or had trouble understanding. I leave this up to you so pick what suits you. You will write about this reading, fleshing it out in its historical, philosophical, religious, and cultural context. Readings you may choose include primary sources on early science (e.g., Aristotle and any of the early modern thinkers we covered such as Descartes or Newton); Thomas Kuhn; or any of the case studies we consider such as evolution vs intelligent design. Topics might include the connection between aesthetics/religion/God and scientific explanation, the influence of metaphysical frameworks and cultural values on scientific methodology, or the social dimensions of scientific paradigms and knowledge. This assignment will help you to think critically and analytically about philosophical problems in the history of science, and it will also let you practice your writing and revision skills. Writing is a skill, and you have to practice it. I will provide you with extensive feedback. A part of your grade for Paper 2 will depend on whether you took this feedback seriously for the next paper. Directions: On the first page, you are to summarize the reading. Note that if the reading is long, you may focus on one particular aspect of it. Questions that should be answered: What is the reading about? What is the topic? What is the argument? What are the reasons given in support of the argument? What is the author trying to do? What are the cultural assumptions that the author takes for granted? The purpose of the first page is to show me that you understand the reading and its context AND that you can restate it in your own words. Do not quote the text, but put it in words in a way you would when describing it to a friend or family member. Note that even paraphrasing requires in-text citations. Show me where you found the information, including the page number. That way, I can double check it if need be. This is how you cite properly. It goes without saying that plagiarism will constitute academic integrity and merit failure of the assignment at best, and failure of the course at worst. The second and third+ pages are the critical or philosophical component. I want you to "react" to the paper. Not just an emotional reaction, but I want you to give me reasons or connect the dots. Possible ways to respond: Is there something wrong with the argument? Should it be criticized? Should we believe what the author is saying? If not, why not? Is this reading relevant to your understanding of yourself or your place in the world? How does this writer’s idea relate to his or her cultural background? What is the connection to the humanities? These are all possible ways of proceeding. 2 Make sure this paragraph is a claim, not just a mere opinion. Imagine you are trying to convince me or someone else that your claim is worthy of belief. For instance, if you find Descartes’ religious grounding of laws of nature to be problematic, make an argument where you show exactly what is problematic about it after you have explained his argument. Or, if you think Kuhn’s account of paradigms is valuable because it has application outside science, make an argument where you explain and defend just how it is. The main point is that the first page shows me you understand the analyzed material, and the rest of the paper presents a critical thesis or claim that you can support with reasons that goes beyond the text. However you choose to go about these, make sure to be clear and proofread your assignment. I will correct for grammar and typos, but I rather spend time helping you with the substance and ideas. I recommend reading your paper aloud before submitting it. This can help you catch little mistakes and run-on sentences. Please let me know if you have further questions. ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Final Answer

Daria4117 (1712)
UC Berkeley

Top quality work from this tutor! I’ll be back!

Heard about Studypool for a while and finally tried it. Glad I did caus this was really helpful.

Thank you! Reasonably priced given the quality

Similar Questions
Related Tags