The topic of gun control is a controversial and sensitive aspect that has been a subject of
debate over the past years. Currently, there are mass shootings, and the problem has been
discussed by many people on what can be the best solution. Rosen highlights the procedures of
obtaining information from the National Tracing Center for her to deduce analysis and
conclusion to determine laws and regulations of acquiring and owning gun control (2). She
argued that there is a diversity of requirements, thus making the results of gun utilization and
how the phenomenon affects the rates of crime. There are many sides of debates towards gun
control, and people against it argue that controlling gun utilizations is not a solution to high rates
of mass shootings, and the rights to own guns are not the solutions. On the other hand, people
who are against ownership of guns argued that the existing challenges are generally due to
firearms, such as high rates of crimes and mass shootings. Any patriotic citizen needs to be
allowed to own a gun so that they can defend themselves from harm such as mass shooting cases
and many more, and thus, gun control debate is a misfire.
Shooters will still have access to firearms even when the strict gun rules are in place.
Controlling firearms will not stop criminals from acquiring guns and eventually will not be a
solution to high incidences of mass shootings. Criminals tend not to obey laws; hence whenever
there is a chance, they quickly utilize them in public irrespective of the rules and regulations in
place. It is according to Rosen that there are multiple misfires in gun control, and thus controlling
it will not be a unique mechanism because criminals tend not to adhere to guidelines of demand
and supply (12). The main reason is that heinous activities such as mass shootings lies
exclusively on problems such as psychotic behaviors. Therefore, there is a need to develop a
solution that should be utilized in deterring the criminal from doing or carrying out such acts in
The current and the oldest laws have not been successful in enacting measures of gun
control and regulation strictly because criminals tend to purchase them from anywhere. The
government thus needs to look for alternative solutions that have resulted in the problems.
People should understand that the issues of mass shooting performed by criminals are attained
mainly because of the supply of illegal guns in the market. There is a lot of cash that exists in the
black market, and thus, some people will benefit from the profits of selling illegals guns and thus
selling it to the wrong hands. Rosen argued that although there are laws such as background
checks and many more, criminals do not follow the right procedures, and so long as there is
sufficient money to spend on purchasing them.
Gun control rules and regulations infringe people`s rights to self-defense and personal
safety. According to the National Rifle Association (NRA), firearms utilized in self-defense are
more than 2 million times annually. Law enforcement officers are not in a position to protect
every person all the time. According to the Pew survey, 61% of men and 55% of women argued
that strict gun control laws would make it hard for individuals to protect their families and
property. The right to self-defense is a fundamental right that arises out of the right to life.
Therefore, gun control will interfere with the capability of law-abiding people to defend
themselves against criminals. According to multiple studies, people who owned guys argued that
they feel much safer.
Gun control regulations give too much power to the state and may lead to tyranny. Also,
background check and micro-stamping is an invasion of privacy. Background checks need the
country to develop databases that keep personal data on gun owners such as name, address,
criminal history, mental health information, and many more. Some laws allow people to exercise
their rights without being subjected to state surveillance. Many researchers have argued
ownership of guns is not related to suicides. For instance, Japan has the lowest gun ownership
rates, but with the highest suicides, about 18 per 100 00 people. The assumption that restrictions
or eradication of firearms would have a positive impact on the suicide rates in the United States
does not hold up under scrutiny.
Overall, it is evident from Rosen`s arguments that having strict gun laws does not
primary relates to the reduction of criminal activities and mass shootings. There are inverse
correlations that have been confirmed in states that have tight gun rules with the incidence of
robbery being evaluated of the same in these towns. Effective strategies need to be put in place to
stop mass shootings rather than the utilization of gun restrictions to the general public. Gun
control is not an effective way of solving the current crisis.
Rosen, Meghan. "Misfires in the Gun Control Debate." Audiobook.
Purchase answer to see full