CH11 Amazon v New York Times Legal Issues and Public Relations Case Study

Question Description

I need support with this Writing question so I can learn better.

I hope this finds you all doing well. Attached please find your notes on chapter 11 – Legal. Please read thoroughly as this chapter will introduce you to a variety of legal issues facing the public relations practice today.

CASE STUDY – Amazon v. New York Times

In 2015, the New York Times ran a negative story about Amazon’s workplace conditions. To combat this negative coverage, Jay Carney, a former White House press secretary and Amazon’s senior vice president for corporate affairs, criticized the New York Times story and its source on Medium.com. sources from this story included anonymous sources that did not reveal their true identities because of a nondisclosure agreement with Amazon. 

A major source for this story, a former Amazon employee, Bo Olsen, gave an interview with the New York Times criticizing Amazon’s workplace. In his response, Carney revealed that Olsen was under investigation for fraud during his time at Amazon. Olsen actually admitted he had attempted to defraud vendors and resigned his position because of that. This case study illustrates corporations’ willingness to use communication tactics, as opposed to legal ones, to combat negative publicity. The case study of Amazon v. NYT presents an example of the tensions between defamation and privacy laws and demonstrates how corporations use social media platforms to combat negative press attention. 

For your assignment I want you suppose you work as the social media manager for the restaurant chain Best Burger. One day while scanning posts about your company, you see that someone on Twitter posted three very negative comments about Best Burger. The comments were as follows: 

Tweet 1: Best Burger is the WORST restaurant EVER!!! #nevereathere

Tweet 2: Best Burger’s food tastes like cardboard. It isn’t even real food

Tweet 3: Best Burger is not worth the price. They use dog food to make their hamburgers.

Assuming that Best Burger thinks its hamburgers are great and that the do not use dog food to make them, are any of these comments subject to defamation laws? Why or why not? Write a two-page paper regarding your answer. This is due on Thursday, March 26, 2020. I will send Chapter 12 with your assignment on Friday, March 27, 2020. Please e-mail me or call me with amy questions. Stay safe and well.

Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Final Answer



Legal Issues and Public Relations
Institution Affiliation




Organizations around the world have come across several issues and especially
regarding their reputation. Essentially, Best Burger is no exemption and we are ready for any
information some of which do not have a source is just aimed at tainting the name of the
company. Some of the information that has been going around social media is not correct and
there is nothing to prove that there have been such cases in the normal. This is not the first
case involving a major company such as Best Burger. Other companies such as Amazon have
also had some such cases regarding their operations.
Best Burger is one of the companies that have always p...

benwamonicah (21946)
UT Austin

The tutor was pretty knowledgeable, efficient and polite. Great service!

Heard about Studypool for a while and finally tried it. Glad I did caus this was really helpful.

Just what I needed… fantastic!

Similar Questions
Related Tags