Humanities
Albany College of Pharmacy Aristotle Human Beings Are Not Naturally Virtuous Paper

Albany College of Pharmacy

Question Description

I need an explanation for this Philosophy question to help me study.

Check the attachment, all the requirements are listed on first and half page and rest of second half and page is explaining the topic.

Please do as best as you can, I do not want nothing less than 90% of grade!

I need two full pages of essay and citation page if used any. Please no heading, no headers name or nothing on the page besides essay.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

General Guidelines and Requirements for Papers: 1. Writing must be clear and says what you mean it to say fully and directly. 2. Make sure to address all parts of the question or prompt. 3. You should write for an audience who are generally acquainted with the texts you are discussing, with the aim of clarifying and deepening their understanding of those texts and their main ideas and/or of taking and defending your own position about the issues under discussion. a. your goal will be to try to offer your own account of the ideas covered in these texts, explaining what those ideas are, their meaning, how they can be justified, what is important or significant about them and/or what you object to and think should be viewed otherwise. In all cases, you should provide reasons and evidence in support of your account or your assessment. b. DO NOT write ‘book report’ style papers, where you spend a bunch of time giving basic background about the author or the texts in question. Make sure any background you do supply is directly relevant to the matters you are discussing and is necessary to make them clear. c. DO NOT write in a tone that ‘hypes’ the author or text under discussion. Your goal should be to provide a sober, critical assessment, not make things sound great. 4. On textual support. In the course of your paper, it is important that you establish that the views you are attributing to the authors you are discussing are what they hold. a. There are two ways of doing this. I. In cases where the view can be adequately represented in a summary or paraphrase form, you can provide a citation to the place where the author expresses the view you are attributing to them. II. In cases where the view needs to be exhibited in the author’s own words, you should quote and provide a citation. Quoting can be necessary for a number for reasons, such as precision (which is a good reason to use someone’s exact language in many cases), or because the interpretation of an author’s position on a certain point is controversial and you want to establish exactly what they say in order to support a specific characterization of their view, or because the view needs some explanation, which should start with a careful discussion of their own language. b. Some further points: i. When quoting, be sure to provide enough context and explanation of the text you are quoting to ensure that its meaning is clear, and the reader can understand how it supports or illustrates what you are saying. (Sometimes just quoting will be enough, but often it will not be). ii. Remember, even when you are simply summarizing key ideas found in the text in your own words, you must provide citation references to aid the reader in locating discussion of those ideas in the original. iii. Finally, make sure that you have something of your own to say about the texts you quote or refer to beyond simply stringing together quotations or paraphrases of their content. Tell the reader why and how these texts are important, interesting, or how they illustrate a point you want to make. 5. Some other notes about philosophical writing: a. It is common in philosophy to use first person constructions like ‘I will argue that...’ or ‘I believe that...’. You should feel free to do so, especially since it will almost surely make your writing clearer. b. Philosophical writing relies to a great extent on consistency of terminological usage. Rather than seeking synonyms to avoid using ‘common’ words, or trying to rephrase another author’s formulation in ‘your own’ terms, it is better to use the words that first come to mind when trying to say something and to stick with (or close to) other people’s precise formulations when discussing their claims, especially if you have reason to believe that the language in question contains technical vocabulary – i.e., terms around which the author is developing their concepts. i. Obviously, when using other people’s language, you should enclose what you are using in quotation marks and provide clear references for where they first made that formulation. And references should also be supplied for paraphrases, even when you are not directly quoting. 6. Papers should be formatted according to the Chicago Manual of Style ‘notes and bibliography’ guidelines, with no title page or abstract. a. For examples, see http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html. b. All papers must include complete and correct bibliographic information for all sources cited or consulted. This will always be listed in the footnotes and may also need to be listed in a separate bibliography at the end of the paper. i. If all sources you consulted in preparation of the paper are directly referenced in the footnotes (either as a result of quotation or paraphrase and citation), then you do not need to include a separate bibliography. ii. If, on the other hand, you consulted sources you did not reference in the footnotes, you must include a separate bibliography. c. Footnotes should be created using the ‘insert footnote’ function on your word processing software, not as running footers or manually. i. Every modern word processing program can do this and knowing how to use this function is an important part of university level writing competency. The ‘help’ menu on your word processing software is a good place to start if you’re unsure what to do. Paper will be evaluated for content, including quality and precision of thought, as well as organization and clarity of presentation. Generally, minor grammatical and stylistic issues will be overlooked in favor of these matters of content and presentation, but this will only be true insofar as those issues do not affect the substance of your discussion or its comprehensibility. TOPIC Explain Aristotle’s claim in Book II that human beings are not naturally virtuous, but that we become virtuous by habituation. Situate this claim in relation to his general account of virtue in Book I, Chapter 7. Then discuss the relation between this account of learning to be good and Aristotle’s claim that the virtues of character are states. What is the role of virtuous actions in this account? And finally, explain how the emphasis on the formation of states through habituation connects to the account of the human function, the claim that the virtuous life should be pleasant, and the claim that virtuous action should reflect correct reason. Guidelines Must be Followed!! Thanks ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Final Answer

Attached.

Surname 1

Name:
Professor:
Title:
Date:
Aristotle - Human Beings Are Not Naturally Virtuous

According to Aristotle, virtue is something that can only be learned and improved, and
that it is something that takes time to build1. He then likens it to the fact that a stone, by design,
will always fall downwards when released from a certain height, and that no amount of
“training” it will make it go upwards. This analogy is to imply that if virtue were a nature of
human beings, it would be impossible to change it2.
In Book 1, Chapter 7, Aristotle talks about the various outcomes of learning something. I
believe that he is trying to show that even though one can learn to do something, he does not
have to be as good as someone else. He explains this notion through two harpers, whereby one of
them performs the basic functions of playing the harp, while the other one is good at playing the
harp3. In this case, playing the harp can be considered a virtue, and that there is a scale that
measures the quality of the virtue. However, the two harpers are considered to act within the
spheres of their abilities or functions4. I take this to mean that when people perform certain tasks,
they do so based on what they think is their responsibility or skills. As much as they can learn
how to do something, they may be limited by their abilities or what they are comfortable with
1

Book 2 (1.1)

2

Book 2 (1.2)

3

Book 1 (7.14)

4

Book 1 (7.15)

1

Surname 2

doing. For instance, not everyone is interested in being the best in something, let alone being
good at it.
Aristotle talks about learning to be good. He begins book one by stating that there always
seems to be a pursuit for goodness in “every art and every investigation”5. I believe this means
that if a pursuit is a journey, then good is a destination. In other words, the good is the end goal.
When Aristotle talks about becoming good at something, he is referring to the practical sense of
that action. For instance, he mentions that for people to become builders, they must first build,
and the same happens when one wants to be just...

smithwiliams (18851)
University of Maryland

Anonymous
Solid work, thanks.

Anonymous
The tutor was great. I’m satisfied with the service.

Anonymous
Goes above and beyond expectations !

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
Similar Questions
Related Tags