Humanities
UMGC Supreme Court Case Obergfell v Hodges Research Paper

University of Maryland Global Campus

Question Description

Can you help me understand this Political Science question?

Please write a 5-7 page research paper analyzing the Supreme Court case Obergfell v Hodges. You are required to write a detailed evaluative research paper a minimum of 5 pages, not including cover page, abstract or work cited.

1. Give a brief historical background of the case including the issue argued.

2. The constitutional question in your case.

3. the brief analysis of the decision in the case.

4. a brief description of the majority opinion.

5. a brief description of the dissenting opinion.

6. a brief description of an concurring opinions.

7. How you feel about the case.

Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Final Answer

Hello buddy, here is the completed assignment. I will be around to help
with the edits and future questions. Goodbye and take care

Surname 1
Student
Instructor
Course
Date
Obergfell v Hodges Case Analysis
Historical Background and the Issue Argued
Same-sex marriages have been a subject of debate in the U.S. for decades, and the
Obergfell v. Hodges case illustrates the gravity of the issue. Before the Case, about 70% of states
in the country recognized and allowed same-sex marriages while 13 had bans on the unions
(Georgetown Law Library n.p.). Subsequently, fourteen same-gender partners and two other
plaintiffs, whose partners had since passed away, accused several states of violating the
constitution. The plaintiffs claimed that by denying them the right to marry, Ohio, Michigan,
Tennessee, and Kentucky violated the Constitution’s 14th Amendment. These local governments
considered marriage to be a union between a man and a woman. Therefore, they considered
unions between individuals of the same gender to be illegal (SCUS 7). The plaintiffs argued that
the states violated the constitution because they failed to give same-sex partners the rights that
they enjoyed in other states.
The Constitutional Question
The constitutional question in the case is whether the 14th Amendment needs states to
permit same-gender unions. Additionally, the question extends to whether the 14th Amendment
mandates states to acknowledge the same-sex marriages that were licensed in other states.
Analysis of the Decision in the Case

Surname 2
The court held that the 14th Amendment allows states to authorize same-gender unions
and recognize same-sex marriages licensed in other states. To support the ruling, it claimed that
the decision would provide same-sex partners with privileges and responsibilities (9).
Additionally, it argued that changes in marriage have strengthened instead of weakening over
time (12). Besides, the liberties guaranteed by the amendment’s Due Process Clause entail
individual choices related to self-worth and autonomy (15...

ProfHenryM (16573)
New York University

Anonymous
Top quality work from this tutor! I’ll be back!

Anonymous
It’s my second time using SP and the work has been great back to back :) The one and only resource on the Interwebs for the work that needs to be done!

Anonymous
Thanks, good work

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
Similar Questions
Related Tags