Running head: BASIC BIOLOGY
Epistemology entails an understanding on how we arrive at knowing that something is
precisely the case, if it is a matter of fact, for instance, "the warming of the Earth'' or a matter
regarding value like people ought not to be treated as means to the ends of other people. It does
not necessarily ask questions concerning what we ought to do in finding out the thing which is the
ultimate task of disciplines to some range, for example, anthropology and history (ANDREW,
You can know that you know something by looking at the facts or things that you have
always known that they are true. Consequently, when we do not question whatever we think or
assume to be true since we wind upholding the belief that such things are not false (Clark, Douglas,
& Choi, 2018). This most likely takes place when the authority in place tells that something is the
case. Our mothers are not the only authorities we can rely on as a source of knowledge. Other
authorities that are common and we can depend on them include teachers, our school, churches,
and the government.
Additionally, you can know that you know something because you have had an experience
of it directly. For instance, you know that an electric fence is painful and dangerous if you have
ever touched it while you are standing in a pool of water. This means that you have the time that
you are in a position to recall when we did learn something through an experience that we had
Something I know about only children is that children who are brought up without siblings grow
up while they are unpleasant and spoiled. This is because those do not grow with siblings turn out
to be worse as compared to their counterparts who grow up with siblings, especially in the
development of good skills of socialization. I find this to be the truth because in this case, we often
learn that there are things that someone else knows to be true is not the truth after all. Sometimes
I find my assumptions to be correct.
As far as Espinoza is concerned, critical thinking is referred to as a way of forming an
opinion based on a minimum of two perspectives, whereas wisdom is seen as using three more
even more viewpoints. Undeniably, it is known that, in the contemporary world, knowledge has
since then become fragmented. Therefore, critical thinking is believed to have a very crucial
property that ways at it paves the for a change between understanding and knowledge.
I agree with the fact that critical thinking and a clear understanding is more desirable as compared
to knowledge or even information. Nevertheless, without where there is no ability to think
critically, one is likely not to exercise judgement. This is very crucial in the assessment of
information, for instance, one which the internet provides, which is perhaps one of the most
common sources of information that is available to date.
In addition, the foundation of critical thinking is thinking, one of the things I consider as
more imperative in contrast to knowledge acquisition itself. Thus, I hold the conviction that the
most vital skill that teachers can impart in the students towards developing any subject is the ability
to be reflective. This means that as you keep reading, you ought to engage with the reading material
actively and not being any other passive participant. This allows you to discover that science, as
well as scientific knowledge, are prone to criticism and not just being accepted. This becomes very
important where you are faced with statements which have been prepared in the style of science
or those that are strictly speaking (Espinoza & Ukleja, 2016).
Where one lacks critical thinking, this exposes one at the mercy ...
15 Million Students Helped!
Sign up to view the full answer