Writing
POLS 210 HCC Developing World Internal Conflicts Discussion

POLS 210

Houston community college

POLS

Question Description

I don’t know how to handle this Political Science question and need guidance.

What is a DWIC? What characteristics do DWICs have that differ from traditional conflict? Are they anything new? Why are attempts to intervene in them so difficult?

  1. write at the minimum a one full page response to this question. Your response should be organized by the question sub parts. ( 4)
  2. Citations - please follow the source and sourcing document exactly per class discussion virtually every class period this term ( see copy attached)
    1. Cite our class textbook
    2. Cite at least two other sources
    3. Please follow the source and sourcing document exactly per many discussions and document

One more time,

  • this only pertains to a couple of students, but nonetheless, it is worth repeating, please follow the source and sourcing document etc.
  • Please see the recent message regarding credit for discussion items and as per class discussion.
  • Reminder please keep a copy of all work submitted for this class, including discussion items and include the academic statement, per the syllabus and as per class discussion.

---------

Note:the book citation is below:

(BOOK): Snow, Donald M. “National Security (Sixth Edition).” New York, New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 2017, Pp. 284. Print.:

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Document1 Discussion # 6 This discussion item pertains to chapter 11 of our class text book. Institutions in Action question three: “In what sense does economic globalization come at the expense of strong state autonomy” ? “What is rational is real, and what is real is rational.” G.W.F. Hegel Dr. O’Neil summarizes at the end of the chapter, and in conclusion of the book, and reminds us of economist Dani Rodrik concept of “Trilemma” global economic integration, the nation state, and democracy. “Does one country’s freedom or equality come at the expense of another’s? How can freedom or equality be balanced globally in the absence of any single sovereign power or dominate regime?”[1] I would contend that these questions are clear, yet the answers are ambiguous as it is a matter of choice. Let me equate to as Ben Franklin would describe “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety” To clarify this statement and put this in the context of the question(s) Benjamin Wittes writes; “ Franklin was (thus) complaining of the choice facing the legislature between being able to make funds available for frontier defense and maintaining its right of self-governance--and he was criticizing the governor for suggesting it should be willing to give up the latter to ensure the former. In short, Franklin was not describing some tension between government power and individual liberty. He was describing, rather, effective selfgovernment in the service of security as the very liberty it would be contemptible to trade.”[2] The author speaks of “Essential Liberty” and for me what came to mind was the European Union, NATO and of decisive decisions post World War II, due to a decline of nationalism and centuries of war, on one hand and redefined imperialism and neocolonialism on the other. As we consider the IGO of the EU, UN, and of Bretton-Woods,(1944) and the associated economic international regimes, such as the WTO, and various MNC’s. The fall of the Soviet Union and of the Twin Towers, as Dr. Snow points out “Two major changes or Fault lines” [3] these historical events redefined and defined National Security, and with-it unique considerations on globalization from optimism and prosperity and redefined priorities, to one of restructuring and security aligned with conflict and nation building, each with consequences of globalization. Henry Kissinger considers the role of American politics, “For America, any association with Realpolitik must take into account the core values of the first society in history to have been explicitly created in the name of liberty. Yet America’s survival and progress will depend as well on its ability to make choices which reflect contemporary reality.”[4] Autonomy and sovereignty, go hand and hand, as do capacity and autonomy to some degree, case in point the executive powers and undeclared war, the “state” as defined by Webber “is an organization that maintains a monopoly of violence over territory” One must also consider modernization theory increase of China and Russia in the last three decades. Dr. O’Neil asks the question, of a new era, and whether it is a utopia of prosperity and peace or a dystopia 1 Document1 of inequality and conflict? Freedom and equality are all defined and evaluated in of our book, and as noted mean different things to different people as much as modern and postmodern refer to different dynamics of institutions. Globalization has expanded exponentially with the development of nation states and, as Dr. O’Neil defends is nothing new, however, as Francis Fukuyama asks is this “The End of History.” [1](BOOK): ) O’Neil, Patrick H. “Essentials of Comparative Politics.” 6th ed. W.W. Norton & Company Inc. New York, NY. 2017. Pp. 366. Print. [2] (WEBSOURCE): “What Ben Franklin Really Said. 15 July 2011.” Lawfare. Web. 3 Aug 2019. https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-ben-franklin-really-said. [3] (BOOK): Snow, Donald M. “National Security.” (6th) Ed. New York, New York. Routledge, 2017. Pp. 107 Print. [4] (BOOK): Kissinger, Henry. “Diplomacy.” (1st) New York, NY: Touchstone, 1995. Pp. 836 Print. 2 Document1 (SCHOLARLY JOURNAL): Harding, T.W. "Torture." Refugee Survey Quarterly .Vol.21: pp.135-138. Print. (WEB SOURCE): "Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949.” International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), 12 Aug. 1949. Web. 14 June 2014. . (BOOK): Clarke, Alan. “Rendition to Torture.” Piscataway, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 2012. Pp. 16 Print. (NEWSPAPER): "No Penalty for Torture." New York Times 5 Sept. 2012: pp. A26 (L). Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Print. ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Final Answer

Attached.

Running head: DEVELOPING WORLD INTERNAL CONFLICTS

Developing World Internal Conflicts
Name
Institution

1

DEVELOPING WORLD INTERNAL CONFLICTS

2

Developing World Internal Conflicts
Developing world internal conflicts (DWICs) are contests that arise between religious
or ethnic groups within a political state that the two groups do not have primary loyalty. Most
of the conflicts involved in DWICs are internal and reflect the imperfections that arose during
independence. Continued advancement, particularly on the technological front, has seen the
casting of the conflicts worldwide to generate horror reactions from humanitarian
perspectives and call for geopolitical interventions to end the conflict (1). The...

henryprofessor (72595)
UCLA

Anonymous
Thanks for the help.

Anonymous
Outstanding. Studypool always delivers quality work.

Anonymous
Tutor was very helpful and took the time to explain concepts to me. Very responsive, managed to get replies within the hour.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
Similar Questions
Related Tags