PLEASE ALREADY HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING OF THESE PRINCIPLES. First, what is the undue burden standard? What was its moral and legal justification? How has it been judicially applied? What are the moral/philosophical and legal/constitutional criticisms of this standard? Are these criticisms valid--why or why not? Finally, do you think it should be the Court's standard to apply going forward? Why or why not? Students are encouraged to go beyond mere summary to develop their own arguments and insights. MLA or footnote citation is acceptable. Write with economy, but thoroughly answer the prompt. Selective quoting is fine, but overquoting should be avoided. 1-inch margins, 12 point font, submitted through Canvas as a Word .doc file.

I describe what Obama needs to do as this role-player.Here is information about this role. And we need to think and finish this articleBarack Obama -- President of the United States USA-A Faction Biography You are President Barack Obama. You were trained as a lawyer and spent many years organizing neighborhood groups in Chicago before going into politics. You were elected to the US Senate frorn Illinois in 2004. Your decision to run fer President in 2008 took people surprise. You were successful in defeating Senator Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Party nomination. You ran on a message of hope and optimism. During your carnpaign you rnde it clear that you were committed to action on climate change. You feel this is the defining issue for your generation, and that a treaty is critical to d•-je future of your two daughters. Your decision to attend the final days of the conference are a high risk gamble that you can achieve an agreement. If you fail, it will be politically damaging. But you cannot suczeed so well that you get a treaty that cannot pass the Senate. Objectives Your goal is to achieve an agreement to slow global warming and reduce emigions of greenhouse gases that includes full participation by China and India. Without this, you Wii! succeed in getting the Senate to accept a treaty. Pending legislation would provi& a reducGon 2020 of about 17%. However, this legislation will almost certainly not pass wit}Eut a firm zzmmiåncnt fiüi.. future emissions. will probAy not actually reduce their total emissions but may agree to make their economies much leg energy intensive (more GDP per ton C02) Relationships Your administration is in a difficult position on this issue. While you strongly gpport action to prevent climate change, the political reality is much different. Senators from parties have made it clear that no treaty on global warming will pass the Senate and take effect if it does not include significant participation from China and India and mechanisms to insure tirir compliance. All projections show that these nations will become the two largest polluters wiåin a few years. Senator Byrd (D- WVa) has single-handedly stopped a number of environmental regulations 'hat would limit the use ofcoal. Everyone agrees that action to stop global wzming will require reductions in coal use. Several Republican senators represent oil interests in tlrir states, and the entire Republican Party is opposed to any new regulations. The US is also the worst recession since the Great Depression pfthe 1930's. This means that rewarces ee limited and it is critical that a treaty not destroy jobs. Stratew Advice Up until now, the Chinese have been very successful in uniting the less developed countries (LDC's) in their demand that the US and Australia need to lead the way on reducing emisions. (The EU is already doing a pretty good job). Your "est challenge may be to split up this coalition and try to isolate China and India fror•e LDC's. 33One way to fry to split the poorer countries away from China is by an offer of aid. Money for adaptation and low emission development has been a major issue for Developing Countries. Once the initial speeches are over and the debates begin' you should use an announcement that the US will commit to helping raise $100 billion per Year by the year 2020 for remediation and energy efficient development to gain the support Of the small LDC's and to put presstre on China. You can mention this pledge in private meetings with the LDC'S before you announce it if you wish. The amount available in 2012 would probably not be more than $30 billion. This will almost guarantee that the Developing Countries will side with you in the negotiati0ns because if you don't succeed, this promise goes away• However, you must be clear that the US is not going to give all this money. This money will come from all the developed countries- Also' the offer is contingent on China and India agreeing to a treaty with strong transparency. You may also take some heat because you can't guarantee the money will all be new money and not just taking current aid and repurposing it for climate related activities. You should also be aggressive in breaking into any private meetings you observe during faction meetings or outside class between China and India and the LDC's. If you see such a meeting, try to join in and use the opportunity to press your points and try to separate the LDC's —Äom-China, You-should also work closely with Australia. They are the only other major developed nation thßt svpports your position. They also have close relations with the Pacific and Asian nations. may be able to succeed where you fail in negotiations because they are not perceived as such •heat. , Victory Objectives You win one point if China and India agree to a political treaty on climate change that holds warming to 2 degrees C. You do not want a legally binding treaty that will be difficult to pass in the Senate: You win a second point if the treaty approved includes strong measures for transparency and requires regular reporting and auditing by an independent body.You can search the Internet for information about the Copenhagen conference to complete this paper.

Fully utilize the materials that have been provided to you in order to support your response. Responses should be a minimum of 250 words and include direct questions. You may challenge, support or supplement another student’s answer using the terms, concepts and theories from the required readings. Also, do not be afraid to respectfully disagree where you feel appropriate; as this should be part of your analysis process at this academic level.Forum posts are graded on timeliness, relevance, knowledge of the weekly readings, and the quality of original ideas. Sources utilized to support answers are to be cited in accordance with the APA writing style by providing a general parenthetical citation (reference the author, year and page number) within your post, as well as an adjoining reference list. Refer to grading rubric for additional details concerning grading criteria.Respond to: CalvinThe registered justification of current left-wing elements is that they are present because fascism is present. As stated in the course work, “Antifa’s protest methods are often violent, and local leaders admit they’re willing to physically attack anyone who employs violence against them or who 'condones racism'” (AMU, 2019). These hapless souls have no idea what real fascism is, so they must invent it and magnify anything that is counter to their unsustainable societal views. I would delve further into their self-manifested ‘ideology’ but it is simple foolishness which centers around a poorly excused reasoning to do violence because of fictitious ‘bullies’ and fantasy episodes spun around the current president. The latter is mostly the rallying call that these weak-minded pack-oriented terrorists endorse and believe. It gained steam after President Trump didn’t pick up their blind zeal and persecute the extreme right-wing elements at the 2017 Charlottesville clash. Someone in power didn’t carry their nonsensical reasoning or espouse their viewpoint to justify committing violence, so now he is dubbed “racist”, “fascist”, etc, etc. This is what happens when everyone gets a trophy growing up and there is this fictitious belief nurtured into the tender hearted that everyone cares what YOU have to say and if there is a problem, it is NEVER your fault, it is someone else’s. This is what happens. The president called the left and the right factions that were present out for what they were that day. Citizens that were courageous, honorable, and exercising their rights, but intermixed with some nefarious elements who were intent on “hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides" (Taylor, 2019). The last part was the trigger phrase that made liberal heads explode. How dare the current president not prematurely jump to side with the left’s twisted logic? How dare he not be ignorant and blind like the last president who lamented over a two bit thug as “if I had a son…..” How dare he? How dare he use caution and reason! Because the President does not delve into community level issues unless it becomes regional and affects the nation. The lesser is the job of the states. You know, the states rights everyone talks of but rarely clamors for unless things are not going their way? I digress.So, the president called out the Charlottesville incident for what it was, right-wing protests aimed at an increasingly out of control left-wing initiative to tear America apart. This built to utter ridiculousness as they rode on the back of feckless liberal politicians desperate to secure as many votes as possible before the twilight of America’s “firsty” president came to a close. The twilight ushed in a new wave of accountability, cessation of ill-gotten benefits, and reality. This category mostly affects Antifa acolytes who are protesting adulthood, jobs, responsibility, and reality by labeling everything they don’t like as “racist”. This platform gives them justification to turn a peaceful protest into a melee because they are fighting Neo-Nazis, Skinheads and KKK demonstrators. But guess what, the Alt-Right has just as much right to be on the street yelling their equally ridiculous saying and slogans. Why would you get upset over a bunch of low rent ideology that really has no traction? Because you have nothing else to do in life. The alt left is not ‘fighting’ anything, they are just purely fighting, a fight that mind you 9/10 times does not end in their favor.Lastly, I know the posting criteria said pick one left wing group, but I cannot resist how the reading this week spoke of the black nationalist movements. I would not categorize them as left, but rather right. They espouse the same platform as the KKK and associated ilk, but they are black (well, most of them are). Nationalism is nationalism, just as racism is racism, and fascism is fascism. Pinning a color or race to an ideological stance is ill-conceived. The NOI and Black Panthers are just like the KKK and neo-Nazi movements. Though their reasoning is curious. They bemoan the federal government as racist slavemasters, yet they engross themselves in activities to defraud the government of welfare, subsidies and other revenue. They complain and stomp around demanding a new nation, yet there is plenty of land in Montana, Idaho, and elsewhere where they could buy and start a compound, er, “new nation” just like the Noe-Nazis did in Idaho (Breitbart, 2016). However, the catch is, if they did that then they would remove themselves from the umbrella of protection the liberal city centers give them to act like fools. They would also be removing themselves from their welfare cash and freeloading societal cradle that has been spun for them in turn for votes each election. No, they will not move to Africa or Canada either. Anyone ever wonder why? Because all the places I mentioned do not endorse freeloading lunacy. The states I mentioned, people actually work, there is little mass welfare, and there would be no fanfare that they enjoy in the middle of Times Square or main street in Philadelphia. They will not go to Canada either because they would get apprehended just like the waves of Somalian exiles did when they vacated Minnesota. Nor will they go back to Africa either as they all ‘dream about’ and preach about, because they know what African blacks think of American blacks; a real and brutal lesson in racism that the NOI really does not want to broadcast. In closing, the violence from Antifa is just violence for the sake of violence with no direction. Not even close in scope to the Weathermen of the ‘70’s nor their murderous intentions towards society. They are just punks who like to cause trouble and get in a fight with an opponent they cannot win against, mostly so they can whine about that too. On the other hand, the Black Panthers are more of a right-wing entity than anything else, in all capacities and their violence is usually centered around killing everything that is not black. This primitive mentality is not shocking, for it is exactly what has been going on in their motherland for eons, tribal extinction via warfare resulting in long sleeve, short sleeve, or slavery (Onishi, 1999). The only difference is that the Black Panther party knows it cannot win a fight against America as a whole, so it targets a very small subset (police officers) and call it a victory. Ambushing police officers is not heroic, nor will it “free them from the white devil by killing some crackers” (SPLC, 2019). That activity will only land them in jail and feed the very statistics they claim are, you guessed it, racist. Thank you all, it has been a good run. Now on to an elective before the capstone which will precipitate Elvis leaving the building! (at least at AMU). References:AMU. 2019. “Left-Wing Extremists and Terrorists.” AMU. https://edge.apus.edu/portal/site/402710/tool/21a16507-c7b7-4f59-8193-82601ac8621c/ShowPage?returnView=&studentItemId=0&backPath=&errorMessage=&clearAttr=&source=&title=&sendingPage=3467841&newTopLevel=false&postedComment=false&addBefore=&itemId=13893976&path=push&addTool=-1&recheck=&id=. (accessed 25 November 2019).Klein, Aaron. 2016. “EXCLUSIVE–New Black Panther Leader: Blacks Need to Migrate to Five SouthernStates, Form ‘Country Within a Country’” Breitbart. https://www.breitbart.com/politics/ 2016/07/10/exclusive-new-black-panther-leader-country-within/. (accessed 25 November 2019).Onishi, Norimitsu. 1999. “Sierra Leone Measures Terror in Severed Limbs” New York Times. https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/world/africa/082299sierra-leone.html. (accessed 25 November 2019).SPLC. 2019. “New Black Panther Party”. Southern Poverty Law Center. https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/new-black-panther-party. (accessed 25 November 2019).Taylor, Jessica. 2017. “Trump Calls Out KKK, White Supremacists After Charlottesville: 'Racism IsEvil’” National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2017/08/14/543418468/trump-calls-out-kkk-white-supremacists-after-charlottesville-racism-is-evil. (accessed 25 November 2019).