discussion response

User Generated

yiraxngn

Computer Science

Description

I have attached word document

can you add response for these in a paragraph for each.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Discussion: 1 1). The legal disputes can be extremely complicated. It keeps dealing with intellectual property, and the capability of high-technology workers have to be working on their jobs for competition. Lawyers from Waymo demanded possibly on considerable damage if Waymo would sell secrets that will be used by competitors (Austin, Graeme & Christie, 2020). His legal team based on the digital for cynics investigation that will be a prude deliberately, which is copied from the personal Files to cover downloading. Most of the workers who left the organization had interviewed to remind them they had signed an agreement relating to the trade secret when they were in the job the organization. 2). Uber decided to pay one-third of one percent of the share of its company to Waymo that was Valued approximately 70 billion (Sharda, Delen, Dursun, & Turban, 2020). Uber has significantly plan to go public, which may increase its valuation. Uber had strongly agreed not to incorporate very most private information to the present or future technology; hence Waymo decided to take Shares instead of money from Uber. 3). The intellectual property refers to the creation of mine, inventions, and symbols or names or images that will use in commerce (Austin, Graeme & Christie, 2020). It includes two categories of industrial property and Copyright, which consists of actual rights related to Copyright that provides for in performing the workers according to their performance. In this case, the capability of high-technology workers who were leaving jobs interviewed. It was purely reminded of their signature for agreement while they were working in an organization. Waymo had further strategic plans that did not include competing activities that will actively compete with self-driving cars. 4). We actively learn that self-driven cars are the majority and significant product of the intelligence system and artificial intelligence with substantial advantages to operators. Legal disputes that were usually in the situation of competition and to protect the critical intellectual property. Other various issues that arose our execution of intelligent system according to the ethics, safety, integration, privacy, and significant functional roles. From this vignette, we have learned about the future significance of new technology in independent vehicles (Zafar & Tabassum, 2020). The technology may have a substantial impact on the organization and its operations. But the effects of society with intelligent systems and precisely with jobs had to explore potential consequences with the system. It also includes robust debate regarding danger versus all possible advantages for a smart system with robots. Discussion :2 Legal issue behind Uber and Waymo Conflict Legal dispute between Uber and Waymo was a famous one and it dealt with the matter of noncompliance regarding rules of Intellectual property. The conflict was a result of noncompliance by an engineer name Lewandowski who revealed all secrets of his former company name Waymo. Not only he revealed the secrets regarding self-driving cars of Waymo but he also persuaded the existing employees of Waymo to join the company “Otto truck” which was a new startup under the Uber company (Turban, Sharda, Delen, 2010). This was a violation of intellectual property as it was unethical and illegal to reveal any confidential information regarding trade with another company. The engineers who left the company due to the influence of Lewandowski were reminded of a trade agreement they signed while joining the company and the agreement stated that they cannot share any information regarding the secrets of the company after leaving. Waymo preferred shares over money during a legal dispute Preferring share over money was a very intelligent move by Waymo as the market value of a share can increase and it will help them in generating more revenue in the future. Contribution in the form of shares indicates permanent partnership and it will also worth around 245 million dollar which is a decent amount. On the other hand, the burden of money on Uber was also increasing every day because they were also bearing the expenses of the other legal cases registered against them. This was the main reason why Uber agreed on the settlement and granted one percent of its share and there were also chances that the valuation of Uber will increase as they were going on public according to their prospects Meaning of intellectual property with respect to Waymo vs Uber case According to this case, Intellectual property signifies revealing trade secrets by members of one company to another. Mr. Lewandowski was charged with downloading of fourteen thousand files regarding Google self-driving vehicles and took and encouraged the startup of a company name “Otto truck” through the personal information it acquired from the company (Rimmer, 2017). It is strictly prohibited to share confidential information regarding the former company an employee was working in and Mr. Lewandowski violated this norm clearly Lesson learned from the well-written Vignette The well-written vignette teaches a lesson to every employee as well as the owner of the company. Violation of data has become common and proper planning and execution are required to curb the ongoing problem of a data breach. The world of competition is over-powering which results in an unsafe environment within the organization and ultimately leads to legal disputes like a breach of property rights. Along with vulnerability regarding violation of intellectual property rights, the role of this novel technology can also be observed in the societal context. The new self-driving car will leave a deep impression on the organization and its management. This vignette also makes it clear that more the organizations should have more safety valves concerning work ethics, important documents as well as the role of the higher officials. This case also highlighted some negative consequences of intelligence which can further damage the organization fully or partially.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Discussion: 1
1). The legal disputes can be extremely complicated. It keeps dealing with intellectual property,
and the capability of high-technology workers have to be working on their jobs for competition.
Lawyers from Waymo demanded possibly on considerable damage if Waymo would sell secrets
that will be used by competitors (Austin, Graeme & Christie, 2020). His legal team based on the
digital for cynics investigation that will be a prude deliberately, which is copied from the
personal Files to cover downloading. Most of the workers who left the organization had
interviewed to remind them they had signed an agreement relating to the trade secret when they
were in the job the organization.
2). Uber decided to pay one-third of one percent of the share of its company to Waymo that was
Valued approximately 70 billion (Sharda, Delen, Dursun, & Turban, 2020). Uber has
significantly plan to go public, which may increase its valuation. Uber had strongly agreed not to
incorporate very most private information to the present or future technology; hence Waymo
decided to take Shares instead of money from Uber.
3). The intellectual property refers to the creation of mine, inventions, and symbols or names or
images that will use in commerce (Austin, Graeme & Christie, 2020). It includes two categories
of industrial property and Copyright, which consists of actual rights related to Copyright that
provides for in performing the workers according to their performance. In this case, the
capability of high-technology workers who were l...


Anonymous
Really helpful material, saved me a great deal of time.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags