5 content slides with graphic image

Business Finance

ARSD India

Question Description

The purpose of this assignment is to differentiate quality improvement (QI), evidence-based practice (EBP), and research.


Instruction
Create a graphic image or visual model differentiating quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research. You can use PowerPoint, Smart Art in Word, or other software that creates a graphic. Be creative in your design. Include the following information in your graphic image or visual model: Compare and contrast quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research. Identify at least one similarity and difference for each. Provide an example of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research. Explain why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting. This assignment requires a minimum of two scholarly sources. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Course Code NUR-630 Class Code NUR-630-O500 Criteria Content Percentage 100.0% Compare and Contrast Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research 10.0% Examples of Quality Improvement, EvidenceBased Practice, and Research 10.0% Description of Why Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research Would Be Applied in a Health Care Setting 10.0% Scholarly Sources 10.0% Technical Requirements: Graphics 30.0% Aesthetic Quality 7.0% Appropriateness 7.0% Synthesis 6.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Visual Model 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Visual model does not compare and contrast quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research. Examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are not present. A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is not present. Scholarly sources are not present. No graphics are used in the visual model. Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content or the purpose of presentation is low quality. There is no evidence that the student has selected an effective tool, technique, or paradigm to achieve the goal as defined in the project or course guideline. Materials (photo, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) are missing. Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is not logical and/or verifiable. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Sources are not documented. Total Points 100.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) Visual model compares and contrasts quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research, but lacks detail or is incomplete. Less than three examples of quality improvement, evidencebased practice, and research are present. A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is present, but lacks details or is incomplete. One or two sources are present, but are not scholarly. Limited research is present. Graphics are used in the visual model, but they are distracting. Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present. Student selection of a tool, technique, or paradigm does not relate to the project or course goal. Student selects materials (photos, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) that are not appropriate for the audience and the situation and are inadequately developed. Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 3: Satisfactory (88.00%) Visual model compares and contrasts quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research. Three examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are present. A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is present. A minimum of two scholarly sources are present. Graphics are used in the visual model. Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear. Student selects a tool, technique, or paradigm that achieves a basic representation as defined in the project or course guideline. Student selects materials (photos, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) that are appropriate for the audience and the situation but some of the development of the material is inadequate. Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects but does not adequately form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements at times is confusing. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 4: Good (92.00%) Visual model compares and contrasts quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research and is detailed. Three examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are present. Most examples are appropriate. A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is present and detailed. A minimum of two scholarly sources are present. Sources address all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Graphics are used in the visual model and visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message. Student selects an effective tool, technique, or paradigm to achieve the desired goal as defined in the project or course guideline. Student selects materials (photos, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) that are appropriate for the audience and the situation. Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements is logical and justified. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 5: Excellent (100.00%) Visual model compares and contrasts quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research and is thorough. Three examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are present. All examples are appropriate. A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is present and thorough. A minimum of two scholarly sources are present. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Graphics are used in the visual model and visual connections contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident. Comments Student shows a deep understanding of the audience and the situation by selecting material that enhances understanding. Student creates tools, techniques, or paradigms that effectively achieve the desired goal. Synthesis is unique. Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together. The combination of elements is verified. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned ...
Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

This question has not been answered.

Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!

Similar Questions
Related Tags