Arizona Christian University Existential Philosophers Analysis Paper

User Generated

AP00105

Writing

Arizona Christian University

Description

Please write a 3500-4000 word paper where you compare three philosophers on a single issue. You should be looking for a synthesis of ideas, instead of simply agreeing with one over the others.

A) Pick no more than two from the following list:

Kierkegaard, Nietzche, Sartre, Camus, Dostoevsky

B) Pick at least one from the following list:

(Martin) Heidegger, (Emmanuel) Levinas, (Simone) de Beauvoir, (Gabriel) Marcel, (Karl) Jaspers, (Hannah) Arendt, (Martin) Buber, (William) James, (Franz) Rosenzweig, (Paul) Tillich

C) If you have fewer than three thinkers after A and B, feel free to choose whichever third figure your would like to discuss that will add to your paper.

Possible topics could include:

-Comparing Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Jasper's philosophy of time.

-Comparing Marcel, Heidegger and Sartre on "thrownness"

-Comparing Kierkegaard, Marcel, and Tillich on existential Christianity

-Comparing Levinas, Buber and Rosenzweig on existential Judaism

-Comparing Heidegger, Sartre and (Walter) Benjamin on "authenticity"

-Comparing James, Freud and Sartre on existential psychoanalysis

-Comparing Arendt, Sartre and Marx on philosophies of politics

-Comparing what makes the literature of Dostoevsky, Sartre and Camus existential (or Milan Kundera or Naguib Mafouz or Gabriel García Márquez or any other literature with existential themes)

Your paper should engage with at least three peer-reviewed journal articles as well as the primary texts from the authors you choose. Papers need an abstract (150 - 250 words), a title page and a reference page--these do not count toward your word count. APA style.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Here you go. In case of any further inputs please let me know!It was good working with you! 👋 Thanks for using Studypool. Take care and good luck!All the best

Running head: EXISTENTIAL CHRISTIANITY

Existential Christianity
Name
Course
Tutor
Date

1

EXISTENTIAL CHRISTIANITY

2
Existential Christianity
Abstract

Existentialisms suggest that there is no objective meaning to life, it affirms, however, that
it is possible for individuals to come up with their own subjective meaning to life. That gives rise
to two forms of existentialism; Atheistic existentialism and Christian existentialism. Christian
existentialism focuses on Christian concepts in the understanding of the meaning of life. The
primary purpose of this paper is to compare Christian existentialism as understood and
propagated by three existentialists; Kierkegaard, Marcel, and Tillich. Kierkegaard delved into the
issue of existentialism as a way of dealing with the problem of how to become a Christian in
Christendom. Thus, by developing existentialism, Kierkegaard had hoped to allow the Christians
within the Christendom to have an understanding of God. According to Kierkegaard, devotion
and suffering are the fundamentals of the creation of a personal relationship with God. He
believed that the process of creating a relationship with God is very hard, and individuals must
toil and be involved in ceaseless devotion. According to him, reason has no place in
existentialism. According to Kierkegaard, in the event that an individual picks faith, they should
suspend reason so as to have faith so that they may have a belief in something that is much
higher than reason. One of the main areas in which Marcel seems to differ from Kierkegaard is
his tendency to speak on the issue of inter-subjectivity as well as the focus on a community,
while Kierkegaard was concerned about individuals and their relationship with God. However,
unlike Kierkegaard, Tillich felt that reason plays a critical role in the understanding of God and
being. However, due to the limitations of human reason, there is a need for humans to also make
use of the concept of experience in the understanding of God and existentialism.

EXISTENTIAL CHRISTIANITY

3

Comparing Kierkegaard, Marcel, and Tillich on existential Christianity
Introduction
The 19th century gave rise to a philosophical system that focused on the struggles of
individuals to find meaning in the meaningless life, especially after rejecting the biblical
worldview, and the manner in which individuals can come to terms with this reality. While it is
evident that existentialisms suggest that there is no objective meaning to life, it affirms, however,
that it is possible for individuals to come up with their own subjective meaning to life. There are
two main types of existentialism; Atheistic existentialism and Christian existentialism. Christian
existentialism focuses on Christian concepts in the understanding of the meaning of life. This
philosophy may be traced to the 19th-century Danish philosopher, Søren Kierkegaard.
Kierkegaard is considered by many people as the founder of existentialism. It is necessary to
note that Christian existentialism was the only form of existentialism, and the other forms of
existentialism arise much later from it. In developing this theory of existentialism, Kierkegaard
created an idea which he referred to as the leap of faith. This idea meant that individuals need to
submit to God without applying any human reasoning. The implication of this is that absolute
faith exists without the influence of philosophical thinking and reasoning, as well as human
intellect.
However, this approach suggests that humans have free will, and as a result, they must be
held responsible for their actions. In essence, existential Christianity does not provide an
opportunity for rationalization of the divine, or theology. The meaning of this is that humans will
lose the understanding of God, that moment when they start rationalizing the understanding of
God. Through the involvement of humans in wars, it has become evident that humans are

EXISTENTIAL CHRISTIANITY

4

incapable of having a rational understanding of God or humanity. Thus, the foundation of
salvation is on the rejection of any rationalized understanding of God and humanity. It is
impossible to realize true salvation when individuals still hold to any rationalized understanding
of God.
Another important assertion of existential Christianity is that there is no belief in the
existence of the soul of a human before birth. Instead, existential Christianity believes that
humans are defined at birth. Mor...


Anonymous
Just what I needed…Fantastic!

Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags