General Electric Company and Berkshire Hathaway Strategic Management Discussion

User Generated

fnhqu2004

Business Finance

Question Description

Help me study for my Business class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

FINAL CASE ANALYSIS, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT-G.E. AND BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY-SPRING 2020 The General Electric Company and Berkshire Hathaway are both companies who are involved in many unrelated businesses, and have similar corporate strategies but have had markedly different financial results over the past twenty years. G.E.’s total revenues grew from $90.8 billion in 1997 to $122.1 billion in 2017 (34% over the 20 years); Berkshire Hathaway’s revenues grew from $10.4 billion in 1997 to $242 billion in 2017 (a growth of 222.7% over 20 years). Over the same period twenty-year period, G.E.’s net profits grew from $8.2 billion in 1997 to $8.0 billion in 2017 (before massive write-offs due to restructuring and other related costs, which resulted in a net loss of $6.2 billion). At the same time, Berkshire Hathaway’s profits grew from $1.9 billion in 1997 to $44.9 billion in 2017, or by 226%. G.E.'s stock price at the end of 1997 was $24.76 and, at the end of 2017, was $17.45. A loss of 30% over the twenty years. G.E. shares now trade between $7.00 and $8.00 a share. G.E. shares traded at an all-time high of $155 per share (split-adjusted) in 2000. Berkshire Hathaway’s stock price (class B shares) at the end of 1997 was $22.74 and $198.22 at the end of 2017. A gain of 89% over the 20 years. Thomas Edison founded G.E. in 1892, and Berkshire Hathaway was founded and is still run by Warren Buffett in 1965, but began as a cotton mill in 1888. G.E. and Berkshire Hathaway have (or have had) both consumer goods and industrial businesses. G.E. has 313,000 employees world-wide, and Berkshire Hathaway has 360.000. Both companies have had an unrelated diversification strategy for some time, and both have made numerous acquisitions in unrelated businesses as well as some related businesses, and have interests in various segments of the financial services industry (banking, insurances, and financing). Both companies also have investments and interests in international operations. The overriding question to be answered by this analysis paper is why Berkshire Hathaway has performed so much better than General Electric during the past twenty years when both companies have had similar strategies. To find some answers to this question, this paper should look at the following issues: 1. Leadership: What role did leadership play in the long-term financial performance of the two companies? What has been the G.E. leadership style? What has been Berkshire Hathaway’s leadership style? How would you describe the differences in the leadership style of the two companies during the twenty years? Do these 1|Page differences affect long-term financial performance? Explain how and why. 2. Culture: Are their differences in the culture of each of the organizations that might explain performance differences? What is G.E. culture? What is the Berkshire Hathaway culture? What are each company’s values? Do these differences explain performance differences? Explain how and why. 3. Compensation: What are differences in compensation and compensation plans for the CEO’s and other executives of the two companies, and how might that contribute to differences in performance? Explain how and why. 4. Management Oversight: Are there differences in the way each company manages and oversees each of the operating businesses? Do the differences contribute to differences in performance? Explain how and why. 5. Approach to Acquisitions: Both G.E. and Berkshire Hathaway have made many acquisitions over the twenty years. Is there a difference in how each company approaches acquiring other companies? Do they have the same criteria? How may the differences in approaches affect long-term financial performance? Explain how and why. ASSIGNMENT DETAILS Prepare a paper addressing the above issues of 5-7 pages in length (double-spaced and excluding the title page, abstract page, and reference page), that follows the course Guidelines for Written Assignments, including APA format. The paper should include a Cover Page; an Abstract; an Introduction (stating purpose of the paper and analysis process); an Overview and Background of each of the companies; a section for Analysis of each of the five questions; a section of the Summary and Conclusions (one to two paragraphs summarizing the key points and conclusions of the paper); and a Reference page. The paper must use a minimum of four (4) credible outside reference sources. C Vogus Arkansas State University College of Business Strategic Management 12/2019 2|Page
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Here is the final answer. Please check it. Thank you so much

Running Head: STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT

2
Abstract

This is a Strategic management analysis of two companies General Electric Company and
Berkshire Hathaway, Which are in various unrelated businesses. The companies have corporate
strategies that are similar, but they experienced considerable differences in their financial results
over twenty years. The differences were mainly caused by the differences in the management of
the two businesses.
Introduction
This paper is focused on analyzing the leadership, culture, compensation, management
oversights, and the acquisition approaches that lead to the differences in the financial
performances of the two companies. For each of these factors, the differences between the two
companies are analyzed over twenty years, together with the effects they have caused the
companies. Moreover, there are reasons as to why or how the factors have led to these
differences in financial performance.
1. Leadership
In most companies, from small-sized companies to big corporations, finance leaders are
involved in all the main decisions of the company. For the Berkshire Hathaway leadership, they
were there to understand and correctly interpret the environment they were operating. They
developed the right winning strategies. They made sure that these strategies were executed
brilliantly. Lastly, they ensured that the impacts of their policies were systematic and well
adjusted hence developing departmental, organizational, and personal and team capabilities. On
the other hand, the General Electric Company leadership failed in all that (Wakabi, 2016).

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT

3

The leadership in General Electric Company is autocratic in which the leaders believe that
they are the smartest people and the unknown more than the others in the company. They make
all the decisions with minimal considerations of inputs from the team members. They have the
control and command approach, which is a typical leadership style mainly was used in the past
but does not exist in today's business world. Berkshire Hathaway is using the favored method of
leadership in which the leaders are ready to share information with the workers about anything
that is affecting the work responsibilities.
They seek opinions from their employees before they approve of any decision. There are
very many benefits to this type of leadership. It promotes cooperation of the workers, encourages
team spirit, and it brings in trust (Hristov & Ramkissoon, 2016). This style gets people to do
what the...

Qzvgel (22953)
Rice University

Similar Content

Related Tags