​Systems Project Management (Kalid2)

Computer Science

Cbfs

Question Description

Systems Project Management (Kalid)

all the requirements in the PDF file

Similarity less than 5%

Turnitin report

The word they didn’t give target but the answer should be written in a professional answer.

Don’t right poor .

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Systems Project Management (COMP 30018)-SPRING-2020-CW1(Assignment1)-All-QP ` IN SEMESTER INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT Module Code: COMP 30018 Module Name: Systems Project Management Level: 3 Max. Marks: 100 Instructions to Student  Answer all questions.  Deadline of submission: 06/06/2020 23:59  The marks received on the assignment will be scaled down to the actual weightage of the assignment which is 50 marks  Formative feedback on the complete assignment draft will be provided if the draft is submitted at least 10 days before the final submission date.  Feedback after final evaluation will be provided by 18/06/2020 Module Learning Outcomes The following LOs are achieved once you complete this assignment 1) Evaluate business environment and be able to manage and implement change towards strategic objectives while critically evaluating the quality of their contribution. 2) Appraise key aspects of a given computer-related project within the scope of the indicative content. Assignment Objective You are encouraged to see the role of a project manager within the broader perspective of strategic business management, understanding where projects come from and why they are selected. Assignment Task Read the following tasks, understand and present your response in a document not more than 12 to 14 pages. Assume that you are a project manager in Muscat Information Systems LLC which is located in KOM. Muscat Information Systems LLC undertakes projects based on specific client requirements. These projects typically include development of:       Transaction Processing Systems Business Intelligence Systems Management information Systems HR Systems Hospital Management Systems Banking Information Systems MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01      Inventory Management Systems Payroll Systems CRM Systems Logistic Management software Mobile application for currency exchange and reporting. Page 1 of 9 Systems Project Management (COMP 30018)-SPRING-2020-CW1(Assignment1)-All-QP   Automation of inventory management and  sales tracking for a chain of restaurants. Design, implement and deploy smart  recycling system that includes software and  hardware to track and report recycling process. Deployment IoT based SMART home security system. Knowledge Management Systems Analyze the efficiency of cloud storage trade-offs with data that are not used so often for computation. Choose any one of the above or any other systems development project or a research based project of your liking (if you are choosing any other system/project, prior approval from your faculty need to be taken) which you would like to head and complete the tasks given: Task 1 (10 marks) Submit a work proposal for this assignment or before 06/05/2020, 23:59 which must include:  Understanding of deliverables – a detail description of deliverables.  General overview of proposed plan - initial understanding of solution to task2.  Timeline for completion of the given tasks. The work proposal must be submitted in a word file through the link available in Moodle. Task 2. : (50 marks) Write the scope statement for the selected project. You can read a research paper “Significance of Scope in Project Success” by Muhammad Nabeel Mirza, available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221201731300234X, and an article “Improve Project Success with Better Scope Management” by Avneet Mathur, available at https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/pdf/improve-project-success-with-better-scopemanagement.pdf, which highlights the key aspects needed to consider while capturing the scope of the project. Note: It is very important that you consider and completely mention the factors needed to write scope statement. The above links can help you to identify the factors needed to write the scope statement. Marks will be awarded for identifying and analyzing all the factors needed for writing the scope statement, minimum four factors expected [10 x 4 = 40marks]. Scope statement by itself have 10 marks. Task 3: (40 marks) For the selected project in task 2 conduct a comprehensive feasibility study: technical, operational and economical, to access whether this project can be taken up or not. MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 2 of 9 Systems Project Management (COMP 30018)-SPRING-2020-CW1(Assignment1)-All-QP Rules & Regulations:      All resources should be cited using CU Harvard style. The final assignment must have a Title page, Table of Contents, References/ bibliography using CU Harvard Style and page numbers. Title Page must have Assignment Name, Module name, Session, your name, ID, and the name of the faculty. Softcopy in word format is to be submitted through Turnitin link on Moodle. Viva will be conducted after the assignment submission as per the dates informed earlier. If needed VIVA will be conducted using MS TEAMS Guidelines:  Assignment must be computer typed.  Font - Times New Roman  Font – Style - Regular  Font - Size - 12  Heading should be with Font Size 14, Bold, Capital and Underline.  Avoid Wikis’ as references.  Explain with suitable diagrams wherever required. Diagrams must be drawn using suitable software or by pencil. Each student has to do the assignment individually You can refer books in eLibrary or use internet resource. But you should not cut and paste material from internet nor provide photocopied material from books. The assignment answers should be in your own words after understanding the matter from the above resources.   Important Policies to be followed 1. Student Academic Integrity Policy*: MEC upholds the spirit of academic integrity in all forms of academic work and any form of violation of academic integrity shall invite severe penalty. Any benefit obtained by indulging in the act of violation of academic integrity shall be cancelled. All cases of violation of academic integrity on the part of the student shall fall under any of the below mentioned categories: 1. Plagiarism 2. Malpractice 3. Ghost Writing 4. Collusion 5. Other cases MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 3 of 9 Systems Project Management (COMP 30018)-SPRING-2020-CW1(Assignment1)-All-QP If the student fails a module and has a proven case of academic integrity violation in this module, the student is required to re-register the module. This is applicable to first and second offenders of plagiarism. 1. Plagiarism A. First offence of plagiarism I. If a student is caught first time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study in any assignment other than project work, the student will be allowed to re-submit the assignment once, within a maximum period of one week. However, a penalty of deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be imposed. II. Period of re-submission: The student will have to re-submit the work one week from the date he or she is advised to re-submit. III. If the re-submitted work is also found to be plagiarized, then that assessment will be awarded a zero mark. Re-submission of the work beyond the maximum period of one week will not be accepted and the assessment will be awarded a zero mark. B. Second offence of plagiarism If any student is caught second time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study (in a subsequent semester), the student will directly be awarded zero for the work in which plagiarism is detected. In such cases, the student will not be allowed to resubmit the work. A warning of suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign an undertaking and undergo counselling session in such cases. 2. Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion A. First offence of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion If a student is caught in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall fail the module and shall be required to re-register the module B. Second Offence of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion If a student is caught a second time in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall fail the module. A warning of suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign an undertaking and undergo counselling session in such cases. 3. Third Offence of Academic Integrity Violation If a student is caught a third time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student shall fail the module and also shall be suspended for one semester from the College, as recommended by institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 4 of 9 Systems Project Management (COMP 30018)-SPRING-2020-CW1(Assignment1)-All-QP 4. Fourth Offence of Academic Integrity Violation: If a student is caught a fourth time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student shall fail the module and also shall be expelled from the College, as recommended by institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. 5. Other cases If a student commits an act of academic integrity violation as per the definition of “other cases” mentioned in the previous section or of a different nature, student’s case shall be forwarded to an institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. The committee shall investigate the case by means of a viva and/or a disciplinary hearing and shall take appropriate decision. The penalty that can be granted to a proven case of academic integrity violation which falls in this category of “other cases” can be a warning/component zero/ module fail/suspension/expulsion depending on the nature and gravity of the offence. 6. Types/Variations of Cases: I. II. III. IV. If plagiarism is detected in any component of one assessment, the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment, even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. If plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism and the policy will then be applied to all students If plagiarism is detected in any component of a group assessment, the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. All students of the group would be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism and the policy will then be applied to all the students of the group. If the assessment consists of components or part submissions that could be a group assessment component (e.g. group assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual reflection), the following will be applicable: a. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, The policy will then be applied to all students of the group. Group assessment component will be resubmitted as per the policy. b. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual assessment component will be resubmitted and the policy will then be applied to that student alone. c. For both (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment. * for further details Refer to MEC Student Academic Integrity Policy in Student Handbook. MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 5 of 9 Systems Project Management (COMP 30018)-SPRING-2020-CW1(Assignment1)-All-QP 2. Late Submission Regulations: It is the students’ responsibility to check all relevant timelines related to assessments. As per the Assessment Policy at MEC, late submissions are allowed for one week (5 working days) for all UG modules with a penalty. In such cases, a deduction of 5% of the marks obtained for the submitted work shall be imposed for each working day following the last date of submission till the date of actual submission. Assessment documents submitted beyond a period of one week (5 working days) after the last date of submission will not be accepted and will be awarded a zero for that assessment. In cases where the submission has been delayed due to extenuating circumstances, the student may be permitted to submit the work without imposing the late submission policy stated above. The extended period of submission will be one week from the original last date of submission. In such cases, the student is expected to submit the supporting certificates on or before the original last date of submission of the assessment and the decision of extension rests with faculty responsible for the assessment .The late submission policy shall be applied if the student fails to submit the work within one week of the original last date of submission. Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if required. 3. Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy To protect and respect the rights, dignity, health, safety, and privacy of research subjects involved including the welfare of animals and the integrity of environment, all student projects are expected to be undertaken as per the MEC Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy. Accordingly the following shall apply.  Research and other enterprise activities shall be conducted by maintaining the high ethical standards consistent with national and international standards and conventions.  Any research at MEC that is categorized as high-risk research shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee.  Research activities involving collection of human or animal tissues and manipulation of microbial, animal or plant cells shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee.  Participants involved in research must be informed about the purpose of research and intended uses of research findings. Written consent must be obtained from people involved prior to the commencement of research.  Data obtained from participants must be treated with high confidence and should be used only for the intended purpose of research. MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 6 of 9 Systems Project Management (COMP 30018)-SPRING-2020-CW1(Assignment1)-All-QP Feedback: Detail feedback will be provided as follows: Submission Scheduled date feedback Channel 14/05/2020 MEC Moodle 18/06/2020 MEC Moodle Assignment work proposal: Detail feedback on the assignment work proposal will be provided. This feedback will help you to understand and reflect on your initial understanding of assignment tasks. Final Assignment Submission: Detail feedback on the assignment document will be provided. Feedback will help you to reflect on your work. Also you can carry forward the feedback comments in understanding and completing the other assessments: Case Study MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 7 of 9 Systems Project Management (COMP 30018)-SPRING-2020-CW1(Assignment1)-All-QP Assessment Evaluation Criteria Classification Reflection and critical analysis. And % Range Knowledge and Understanding/ Evidence of Reading Referencing and Bibliography Presentation, Grammar and Spelling Application of Theory Outstanding Highly competent analytical skills and reflective practice, demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values and principles and professional development planning. Extensive knowledge and depth of understanding of principles and concepts and /or outstanding application of theory in practice. Evidence of reading an extensive range of educational literature/research and where applicable workplace strategies, policies and procedures. Accurate referencing and bibliography correctly using appropriate referencing style Excellent presentation, logically structured, using correct grammar and spelling, excellent cross-referencing and links to supporting evidence Excellent Strong analytical skills and reflective practice used, demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional. development planning Excellent knowledge and understanding of principles and concepts and /or excellent knowledge and understanding of the application of theory in practice Evidence of reading a wide range of educational literature/research and where applicable, workplace strategies, policies and procedures. Appropriate referencing and bibliography correctly using appropriate referencing style Good presentation, competently structured, using correct grammar and spelling, clear and easy to use links to supporting evidence Very Good Quality Good use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Good knowledge or key principles and concepts and/or good knowledge of the application of theory in practice Evidence of reading a good range of educational literature/research and where applicable workplace strategies, policies and procedures. Generally well referenced with correct use of the appropriate referencing style Reasonable presentation, completely structured, acceptable grammar and spelling, acceptable links to supporting evidence Good (Acceptable) Acceptable use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Acceptable knowledge of key principles and concepts and/or knowledge of the application of theory in practice Evidence of reading an appropriate range of educational literature/research and where applicable, relevant workplace policies and procedures Adequate referencing. Generally accurate use of appropriate referencing style Adequate presentation and structure, acceptable grammar and spelling, adequate links to supporting evidence Adequate/ Satisfactory Adequate use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Adequate knowledge of key principles and concepts and/or satisfactory evidence of the application of theory in practice Evidence of minimal reading of educational literature/research and where applicable relevant workplace policies and procedures Adequate referencing. appropriate referencing style used but may contain some inaccuracies. Weak presentation , satisfactory structure, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence Weak /Poor Little use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required competencies and/or professional development planning. Professional values and principles not reflected in the submission. Little evidence of knowledge of key principles or concepts and/or little evidence of the application of theory in practice Little or no evidence of reading outside of the course textbook and/or reference to relevant work place policies and procedures Little or no referencing, incorrect style, or very inaccurate use of appropriate referencing style Poor presentation, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence and/or and/or No evidence of knowledge of key principles or concepts and/or no evidence of application of theory in practice No evidence of reading outside of the course textbook and/or reference to relevant workplace policies and procedures (all learning outcomes not adequately met) and/or ...
Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Tags: Cbfs

This question has not been answered.

Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!