The debate about whether philosophers can make good political leaders is a no
brainer. I do agree with those who opine that philosophers can make good leaders. It has
never been about what one has been before, but about what one can offer and how
responsible one can be. Leaders are individuals who are accountable for the outcomes.
Leadership begins by assuming responsibility on personal level and expands to taking
responsibility for those around them. Leaders make proprieties, plan, communicate, and
make decisions on behalf of other people. This is why I believe that philosophers, most of
them having to become leaders through ties of difficulties, can also make good leaders.
Furthermore, philosophers are the brains of leadership. Throughout history, leaders have
always been mere executioners of what philosophers think because they seem to have a
deeper understanding of the same thought that the leader is working on.
It may come as a shock, but the Greek philosopher, Plato, thought about
leadership a lot. The purpose of this paper is to portray Plato's opinion on leadership as
part of his political governance philosophy and to link his thoughts to today's leadership.
According to Plato in The Republic, he defines his view of leadership through a debate on
public and political life in the state of Polis, the Grecian city. Besides dwelling on the
significance of justice, he also provides a structure for the essence of leadership in a
My verdict that philosophers can make good leaders is supported by the fact that
Plato was unhappy with leaders who lacked wisdom and moral courage to act by the
general interest. Self-interested rulers were the most viable to him. His stand makes sense
in today's world because, more of...
15 Million Students Helped!
Sign up to view the full answer