Watch the Unit 7 Lecture. (Video Transcripts)Read the following scenario.In this unit, we covered how we can test the hypothesis of the function of behavior using the Functional Analysis. The difference between FBA (Functional Behavior Assessment) and FA (Functional Analysis) is that with FBA we are forming a hypothesis about the functional relationship between antecedent and consequence conditions and behavior. With Functional Analysis, we are confirming or proving that these hypothesized relationships are indeed cause and effect relationships. This is done through systematic manipulation of antecedents and consequences to prove that these are the variables that are responsible for the interfering behavior.Debbie is a ten-year-old student at Pine Valley Elementary school. She was previously diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder at the age of two. Debbie has, historically, engaged in self-injurious behavior (SIB), including head banging, which has resulted in significant facial injury. A previous functional behavior assessment was conducted by the BCBA from the school district and it was determined that the function of the SIB appeared to be escape from non-preferred tasks or demands. The teacher was not sure that the results were accurate, as she felt that Debbie was usually compliant with most requests. You are taking over this case and have determined that a structural and consequence analysis should be completed to test the hypothesis that difficult tasks are the antecedent to SIB.According to the examples in the text, how would you conduct a structural analysis for this scenario? Be sure to discuss specific antecedent conditions that could be presented and how you would collect data.According to the examples in the text, how would you conduct a consequence analysis for this scenario? Be sure to discuss specific consequence conditions that could be presented and how you would collect data.Peer Responses: Review your peers’ outline of how they would conduct a structural and consequence analysis for the provided scenario. Explain ethical considerations that would apply to the functional analysis that your peer has outlined.Reading and ResourcesRead Chapter 9 in Conducting School-Based Functional Behavioral Assessments: A Practitioner’s Guide: "Experimental Functional Behavior Assessment"Chapter 9 presents information on the process of testing the hypotheses identified during indirect and direct assessment methods through the use of Brief Functional Analysis.TEXTBOOKSSteege, M. W., Pratt, J. L., Wickerd, G., Guare, R., Watson, T. S. Conducting School-Based Functional Behavioral Assessments, Third Edition.

Put your name in the upper left hand corner on the top margin in a header. Do not include any other information there. Your first line should contain your title, which you will center and double-space within if it runs longer than one line and will double-space after; create your own title.Begin your response.Use ParagraphingDouble-space the entire response.The Response needs to be 3 full pages minimum and 4 full pages maximum--though if you need a bit extra, going on into a page 5 a bit is fine. Use 12-point Times New Roman font.Do not forget the Writing Handouts I have supplied all semester, especially the one on Specifics, the one on Thesis Statements, and the one on Major Sentence Errors.For any outside information or quoting (short only) you include, simply give the author and title. No need for a Work(s) Cited page or formal documentation, but you still have to give credit for quotations and for unquoted ideas, etc.Feel free to use terms from the book: do not worry about crediting it except for page number in ( ) at the end and outside the quotation marks and any quotations you use from it.Whatever criteria you use as part of your response can come from any of the book’s terms, your own knowledge, material you look up, and your own experience. Keep in mind, however, that you are indeed responding to how the piece of art works or doesn’t (or some of both) for you in light of the prompt: you are evaluating it and supporting/developing your evaluation. It can of course also interpret aspects of your interpretation of it, though you should also link that to how you respond to its meaning to you and how and why you react to that as you do. Be sure to avoid merely generalizing: offer support for all claims.Be sure all quotations include quotation marks: again, avoid Plagiarism.Be sure all quotations include quotation marks: avoid Plagiarism.Prompt # 8, Essay Due Friday, May 8, in Dropbox: Using the following link, respond to the elements of how this dance mixes theatrical elements along with dance based on at least 3 criteria you select from your text and based on elements enough of your own personal response to it as dance and art to meet the usual 3-4 full-page double-spacing requirement for these response essays: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-tW0CkvdDI . I have rechecked this link to be sure it works, and it does. Please note that in making this assignment I carefully chose this particular video because it combines theatre and dance (as well as music: Hozier’s “Take Me to Church,”). Within the dance, it uses interpretive dance, ballet, and modern dance all rolled together. That may offer you some help in approaching this response. You will probably need to copy and paste the link.