Description
please watch and answer questions using 100 words or more. 1.What prevented "good guards" from objecting or countermanding the orders from tough or bad guards?
2. What is your overall reaction to the film?
3. Was it ethical to do this study? Was it right to trade the suffering experienced by participants for the knowledge gained by the research?
4. If you were the experimenter in charge, would you have done this study? Would you have terminated it earlier? Would you have conducted a follow-up study?
5. After the study, how do you think the prisoners and guards felt when they saw each other in the same civilian clothes again and saw their prison reconverted to a basement laboratory hallway?
6. Knowing what this research says about the power of prison situations to have a corrosive effect on human nature, what recommendations would you make about changing the correctional system in your country?
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
Running Head: HISTORY
1
History
Institutional Affiliation
Name
Date
HISTORY
2
1. What prevented "good guards" from objecting or countermanding the orders from
tough or bad guards?
Answer
I think that the basis as to why the good guards could not object to the tough or bad guards was
because the cruel treatment was not aimed at them. For instance, when the 416 prisoners refused
to eat his sausages and decided to go hungry, he was punished by the guards by placing him
inside the hole which was solidarity confinement situate. The rest of the captive was ordered to
scream at the prisoner and hit at the closet door for prisoner 416 for acting badly. During the act
as well as other many torment situations the bad guards became increasingly sadistic and took
manage of punishing the prisoners. I suppose that the good guards terror the pointing the bad
guards due to their vicious behavior they uttered to the prisoners openly. They could have panic
being tainted like a prisoner for revoking a vicious guard. For them, it was easi...
