Answer both of the following questions as completely as possible. Your answers to these two questions should be, in total, at least two paragraphs in length (approx. 250 words):What are the three methods of dealing with history?How are these three methods distinguished from one another? In other words, identify the basic “elements” of each method and contrast them with one another—in this section that will be easiest done with the first two methods.Once you have completed your post, you will be able to see other students' responses. Select at least two posts to reply to and write thoughtful responses to both of them (each reply should be at least one paragraph in length). Do not simply say "I agree!" or "Good point!" In your replies to other students, you may do any of the following: ask questions about the post, answer questions posed in the post, expand on the post's comments, share relevant web links, or offer an alternative viewpoint. This list is not exhaustive, so don't hesitate to be creative in your replies. Be sure to stay on topic, however!

In practice hardly anyone today accepts the extreme positions of gender development being guided solely either by heredity or environment. It is difficult to accept an “all or nothing” view, so, perhaps, the question should be as to how much of contribution each makes. In this comprehensive Signature Assignment you will debate nature vs. nurture factors and theories in gender development supported by scholarly research throughout. If we accept the view that heredity and environment both influence our gender identity the question that intrigues researchers is how do the two interconnect or where and when they start overlapping? You will explain the theories you will be discussing and include advantages and disadvantages of each of those theories if accepted in its totality, for the individual and for the society at large. Finally, you will state an argument for integration of both theories as you see it. As we discussed above, gender development research is very complicated in its practical sense of executing such a research with minors as well as in the topic itself. More and more researchers are adopting the integrating focus of biological and environmental impact on development. For your Signature Assignment, you will consider aspects of this Nature vs. Nurture debate in research, making sure to include the following in your final paper: Introduction to gender development concepts Biological theories Cognitive/behavioral theories Family/social impact on gender development Stereotypes Cross-cultural perspectives Conclusion supporting your own views based on the research Length: 10-12 pages References: Include a minimum of five scholarly articles published in the last five years in addition to any seminal work if needed. In addition, you may include scholarly websites or other scholarly resources. Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Be sure to adhere to Northcentral University's Academic Integrity Policy.

Discipline-Based Literature ReviewFor this discipline-based literature review, you will research peer-reviewed articles that were published within the last 10 years in the Ashford University Library on the following major perspectives of personality.PsychodynamicBehavioralTraitLearning/SocialHumanisticYou will utilize your researched article to create your literature review. The review should be formatted with the headings and content designated below.IntroductionAssess the types of personality measurements and research designs used in in the peer-reviewed articles you researched. Briefly describe the main theoretical models represented within each of the perspectives of personality and explain the commonalities found across all five. DiscussionExamine the major theoretical approaches, research methods, and assessment instruments used in the five perspectives of personality. Evaluate and describe the current research in these perspectives using a minimum of one peer-reviewed article for each of the five required perspectives. Present a detailed critique of each of the perspectives by evaluating the standardization, reliability and validity, and cultural considerations present in the most common personality assessments used within each. Support your opinions about each model by substantiating them with scholarly research. Be sure to include the following:The theoretical framework(s) for the selected modelsThe major contributors to those fieldsThe methods of inquiry and assessment usually associated with those modelsAn overview of the characteristics, strengths, and weaknesses of the modelsConclusionProvide a summary of your evaluation addressing the current use and relevance of these perspectives in explaining personality citing research as appropriate. Writing the Discipline Based Literature ReviewThe paper:Must be seven to ten double-spaced pages in length and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Must include a title page with the following:Title of paperYour nameCourse name and numberYour instructor’s nameDate submittedMust begin with an introduction that describes and the main theoretical models represented within each of the perspectives of personality.Must address the topics of the paper with critical thought.Must end with a conclusion that summarizes your evaluation addressing the current use and relevance of these perspectives in explaining personality.Must use at least five peer-reviewed sources from the Ashford University Library.Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.