POLB 80 University of Toronto Policy Brief Analysis

User Generated

xlhwva1996

Humanities

POLB 80

University of Toronto

POLB

Description

This policy paper relates to a practical problem in the international system. You are expected to write a concise 1,000-word policy brief with your analysis and policy recommendations.

See the attachment (POLB80 - Policy brief instructions.pdf) for all relevant details.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Policy brief (25% of final grade) You’ve been invited to advise the Canadian prime minister on a recent international crisis. Choose ONE of the below topics and write a max 1,000-word policy brief for the prime minister and his team. Note: These people are very busy with Covid-19 matters and other things, so write in a clear and straightforward way. This isn’t an academic essay, but full sentences should be use. Use the three-part structure below. Remember: you are writing with Canada’s national interest in mind. No outside reading for this is needed (a few links are included below). Use the lecture slides and readings from the syllabus as well (especially for theoretical framing and IR concepts). If you wish, you can use some newspaper articles to get more background. Upload your paper in Word or pdf format to Quercus (under the ‘Policy brief’ tab) by June 1st, 4pm Toronto time. Topic 1: Canada-China relations have been stuck in its lowest point since diplomatic recognition in the early 1970s. It all started when Canada, on a request from the US Department of Justice (and the Trump administration), detained Meng Wanzhou, a high-level executive of the China telecommunications giant Huawei. She has been accused of various charges, including wire fraud and violating US-imposed sanctions. She has been held under house arrest in Vancouver since early December 2018, awaiting her extradition hearing (note: she will not be tried in Canada, but a Canadian judge will determine if the US extradition order is lawful). In response, China has detained two Canadians, altered the prison sentences (to death) for two other Canadians, and stopped importing various Canadian products like soy and pork. Chinese officials have openly said that relations will go back to normal if Mrs Meng is released. Furthermore, China is also insisting that the Canadian government allow Huawei to participate in building Canada’s 5G infrastructure. This has provoked fears within parts of Canada’s security establishment and from several key allies of Canada that Huawei could use this position for espionage and other nefarious purposes. The Prime Minister is tired of this stalemate and wants to make a move: Should we double-down on this approach? Or should we make concessions (including releasing Mrs Meng)? Should we allow Huawei to help build 5G? For more: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-fives-eyes-allies-urged-to-lessendependence-on-china/; https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-in-canada-the-tide-of-opinion-is-turning-onchina/ Topic 2: Last August, the Modi government of India changed the special status of Kashmir, a status that the disputed territory had held for some 70 years. The move decisively binds Kashmir to India and effectively ends any hope of Kashmiri self-determination. Anticipating backlash from locals, the Modi government ordered troops to the territory, put the Kashmiri population under lockdown, arrested some locals and cut off communications with the outside world. The Pakistani government is furious, and tensions between India and Pakistan have again escalated. The Prime Minister is concerned for the people of Kashmir and worried that this unilateral move strains not only India-Canada relations, but may also lead to another war between India and Pakistan, two nuclear-armed countries. Should Canada get involved and in which way? Should Canada actively side with one of the countries over the other? For more on this: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2019-09-20/winning-kashmir-andlosing-india Topic 3: The Chinese government has extended a sweeping national security law to Hong Kong. This same controversial law sparked widespread protests in Hong Kong since the spring of 2019, with locals in Hong Kong fearing the law would end important liberties like a (relatively) free press and independent (meaning not politicized) courts. Although China has had sovereignty over Hong Kong since 1997 (following the handover from the British), Hong Kong’s autonomy was protected under the ‘Basic Law’ (commonly known as ‘One Country, Two Systems’). Hong Kong’s various forms of autonomy will now likely disappear; Hong Kong will come under the same laws and treatment as any other mainland Chinese province. The Prime Minister is worried that this violates many of the important liberties that Hong Kong residents enjoyed, and that it destroys Hong Kong’s limited form of democracy. The Prime Minister is also worried that, if left unchecked, China may pursue similarly aggressive policies in other territories— within China and possibly without. But he is also very aware that the Chinese Communist Party is very sensitive to threats—real and perceived—of its sovereignty. What should Canada’s response be? For more on this: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2019-12-06/do-no-harm-hongkong; https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-china-vows-to-remove-hong-kongs-cancer-ofpro-independence-thought/ Structure of your policy brief: What is the policy problem? (less than 100 words) What is the best theoretical lens (e.g. realist, liberal or constructivist) framework to be understand the issue? Be sure to make some mention of sovereignty, anarchy, trade, democracy, human rights, among other topics covered in classes 1-5. (600-700 words) What is your policy recommendation? (also incorporate at least one of these three IR theories) (200-250 words)
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running Head: POLICY BRIEF

1

POLICY BRIEF
Name
Institution Affiliation
Date

POLICY BRIEF

2

The policy problem
The problem at hand that affects the Canadian government is the crisis brought by the detention
of Meng, the 5G Telecoms author. It has waned the relationship among the three nations, which
are Canada, China, and the USA. Therefore, there have disagreements among the three states. It
has led to restrictions in the trade movements and even cut off imports and exports from m the
countries. However, Canada should make a policy to release Meng Wanzhou and deny Huawei to
build a 5G network. It will help normalize the situation between Canada and Chinese governments.
Theoretical lens
The realist theory
In the field of IR, the realist theory is explicitly explained on how it can be best achieved or find a
solution to any international relations issue. The theory assumes that the chief actor in IR is the
state. It gives more power to the state and limits the power given to individuals and the various
organizations. It focusses on the national interests of the state, such as it leads the state to act in
the same direction. The realist theory further elaborates that the state leaders must control their
affairs to enable them to compete fairly in any competitive market. Therefore it clear that the USA
should look for a way on how to compete fairly in the market, not by preventing China Huawei
Company from dev...


Anonymous
Great study resource, helped me a lot.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags