Basically, I would first introduce what the article is about and objectively summarize what the article says.
Then, I would discuss go about analyzing what facts are true and what the article does well.
Then, I would analyze what the article is inaccurate about or I thought could have been done better.
Lastly, I would summarize what was good and what was bad, and make a conclusion saying that while the article could have been improved, on the whole part it was informative and effective in reaching its audience and delivering its desired message.
Aug 25th, 2014
Did you know? You can earn $20 for every friend you invite to Studypool!