A tonnage-of production method to be used for Canada Steel’s highly cyclical business , Financials assignment help

User Generated

ornetvey81

Business Finance

Description

See attached! It contains all the details and the question itself.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Estimate Net sales $50.6 $42.3 $29.0 Net income (loss) $ 2.0 $(5.7) $ 0.1 Net profit margin 4.0% 0.3% Dividends $ 0.7 $ 0.6 $ 0.00 Return on assets 7.2% 0.4% Return on equity 11.3% 0.9% Current assets $17.68 $14.8 $14.5 Current liabilities $ 6.6 $ 4.9 $ 4.5 Long-term debt $ 2.0 $ 6.1 $ 8.1 Shareholders' equity $17.7 $11.41 $11.5 Shares outstanding (000s) 226.8 170.5 150.5 Per common share: Book value $78.05 $66.70 $76.41 Market price range $42-$34$65-$45 $62-$55* *Year to date Please give me your reaction to my proposals as soon as possible. Required: Assume you are Robert Kinkaid, the financial vice president. Appraise the president's rationale for each of the proposals. You should place special emphasis on how each accounting or business Sig. incr. in debt-to-equity decision affects earnings quality. Support your response with ratio analysis. Canada Steel Co. produces steel casting and metal fabrications for sale to manufacturers of heavy construction machinery and agricultural equipment. Early in Year 3, the company's president sent the following memorandum to the financial vice president: TO: Robert Kinkaid, Financial Vice President FROM: Richard Johnson, President SUBJECT: Accounting and Financial Policies Fiscal Year 2 was a difficult year for us, and the recession is likely to continue into Year 3. While the entire industry is suffering, we might be hurting our performance unnecessarily with accounting and business policies that are not appropriate. Specifically: (1) We depreciate most fixed assets (foundry equipment) over their estimated useful lives on the “tonnage-of-production" method. Accelerated methods and shorter lives are used for income tax purposes. A switch to straight-line for financial reporting purposes could (a) eliminate the deferred tax liability on our balance sheet, and (b) leverage our profits if business picks up in Year 4. (2) Several years ago you convinced me to change from the FIFO to LIFO inventory method. Since inflation is now down to a 4 percent annual rate, and balance sheet strength is important in our current environment, l estimate we can increase shareholders' equity by about $2.0 million, working capital by $4.0 million, and Year 3 earnings by $0.5 million if we return to FIFO in Year 3. This adjustment is real-these profits were earned by us over the past several years and should be recognized. (3) If we make the inventory change, our stock repurchase program can be continued. The same shareholder who sold us 50,000 shares last year at $100 per share would like to sell another 20,000 shares at the same price. However, to obtain additional bank financing, we must maintain the current ratio at 3:1 or better. It seems prudent to decrease our capitalization if return on assets is unsatisfactory and our industry is declining. Also, interest rates are lower (11 percent prime) and we can save $60,000 after taxes annually once our $3.00 per share dividend is resumed. These actions would favorably affect our profitability and liquidity ratios as shown in the pro forma income statement and balance sheet data for Year 3 ($ millions).
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

1. A tonnage-of production method to be used for Canada Steel’s highly cyclical business may
abide to the international accounting standards because it will meet the criteria of matching
principle. This method tends to match the depreciation expenses against the revenue in the
period. Furthermore, this method tends to stabilize earnings since it converts depreciation
expense from fixed to variable. For this kind of business, actual wear and tear on the equipment
is more relevant to replacement need than technological obsolescence.
If the company will planning to switch the depreciation method from accelerated method to
straight line would not eliminate the deferred tax liability. The firm should not attempt to
extinguish this liability since it is an interest-free loan from the government, which may never
...


Anonymous
Really great stuff, couldn't ask for more.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags