Case Study Two: Landlord/Tenant, writing homework help

Jul 18th, 2016
Price: $15 USD

Question description

Case StudyTwo: Sam Stevens lives in an apartment building where he has been working on his new invention, a machine that plays the sound of a barking dog to scareoff potential intruders. A national chain store that sells safety products wantsto sell Sam’s product exclusively. Although Sam and the chain store never signed a contract, Sam verbally told a store manager several months ago that he would ship 1,000 units. Sam comeshome from work one day and finds two letters in his mailbox. One is an eviction notice from his landlord, Quinn, telling him he has to be out of the apartment in 30 days because his barking devicehas been bothering the other tenants. It also states that Sam was not allowed to conduct a business from his apartment. Sam is angry because he specifically told Quinn that he was working on a new invention, and Quinn had wished him luck. The second letter is from the chain store, demanding that Sam deliver the promised 1,000 units immediately.

Specifically, the following critical elementsmust be addressed:

A. Analyze the elements of this case to determine whether a valid contract exists between Sam and the chain store. Support your response by identifying the elements of a valid contract in your analysis.

B. Assume there is not a valid contract between Sam and the chain store. Analyze the elements of a quasi-contract and a promissory estoppel to determine whether the chain store would prevail on a claim of either. Why or why not? Include support for your analysis.

C. Identify the rights and obligations of both the landlord and tenant under a standard residential lease agreement.

D.Based upon those rights and obligations, does Sam’s landlord have grounds to evict? Why or why not?

E. Further, what defenses might Sam raise to an eviction action? Support your response.

Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
School: Purdue University

Running head: CONTRACTS


Contracts-Case Study Two
Student Name:
Institutional Affiliation:



It is outright that a valid contract actually exists between the chin store and Sam. This is
due to the fact that Sam fulfilled the offer element of a contract once he informed the store
manager that he would be shipping 1,000 units of the machines to the chain. In addition, the
consideration, as well as, the acceptance elements of the contract was fulfilled once the chain
store indicated that it was ready to sell the Sam’s product exclusively. Therefore, even though
there was no writte...

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

Review from our student for this Answer

Jul 18th, 2016
"Totally impressed with results!! :-)"
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1821 tutors are online

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors