Students may be more familiar with a quantitative approach to research, but many research problems can be explored using either a quantitative approach, a qualitative approach, or both, in a mixed methods approach. The readings assigned for this week compare qualitative research and quantitative research in a number of ways. In your initial post, briefly compare qualitative and quantitative research. Be sure to address the difference between the interpretive and the positivist paradigms as well as ontological, epistemological, and methodological differences. Reflecting on your own predilections, do you relate to one paradigm more than the other? Which one and why? Post should be at least 300 words.

Washington or dubois Responsed to 2 post 1 I believe that Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. DuBois, both had great narratives but I would have to say that Booker T. Washington provided the narrative that was most effective during this time period. Booker T. Washington was a bit more conservative in my opinion compared to W. E. B. DuBois’s approach. I believe that Booker T. Washington wanted to take a more subtle approach regarding steps that African Americans should take to progress in American society. Washington wanted to explain the narrative of being a slave as “not that bad” in other words. Washington knew that during this time period he had to present a different approach because that is the first step in having the conversation. This approach allows the higher opportunity for individuals to listen and comprehend what is being said and get their point across in the most peaceful of ways.From the narrative, this quote as I understood from reading that slavery is indeed wrong but can’t blame southerners for the participation in slavery. This continued to make me think why, why wouldn’t want to place the blame on the white southerners. But continued reading I know he wanted the topic to be addressed in a different matter to provide progress of peace and work together. “One may get the idea, from what I have said, that there was bitter feeling toward the white people on the part of my race, because of the fact that most of the white population was away fighting in a war which would result in keeping the Negro in slavery if the South was successful. In the case of the slaves on our place this was not true, and it was not true of any large portion of the slave population in the South where the Negro was treated with anything like decency.”E. B. DuBois’s approach was to explain exactly how it was for slaves during this time. I enjoyed reading W. E. B. DuBois’s narrative because he wanted to express the hardships and difficulties the slaves had to endure in this time period.I agree with W. E. B. DuBois’s approach, especially in today’s society. I believe that the truth the good, bad, and ugly parts needed to be addressed when discussing slavery. DuBois’s approach was more direct and assertive which I think is needed especially in today’s time. The truth needs to be told in its purest form, no sugarcoating or scapegoating in my own opinion, accountability needs to be taken. post 2 Going over both Washington's and DuBois's narrative, I feel as though DuBois has a more effective use on the reader for this time period. Even though DuBois was not born a slave, he still experienced living the life of of a black man during the twentieth century. Reading the first chapter alone got me thinking, he states that white people have this unasked question, "To the real question, How does it feel to be a problem? I answer seldom a word." His outtake on being black in America gave a message of aspiration, " He simply wishes to make it possible for a man to be both a Negro and an American, without being cursed and spit upon by his fellows, without having the doors of Opportunity closed roughly in his face." The difference between Washington and DuBois is that the idea of looking at slavery and oppression through various factors, his views on Washington were surprising to read as well, "But so far as Mr. Washington apologizes for injustice, North or South, does not rightly value the privilege and duty of voting, belittles the emasculating effects of caste distinctions, and opposes the higher training and ambition of our brighter minds,—so far as he, the South, or the Nation, does this,—we must unceasingly and firmly oppose them." It seems to me DuBois probably felt pity from Washington which caused him to shift the language into one that dives into more than one thought. Although I believe DuBois was stronger in providing an effecting narrative, I enjoyed reading Washington's more. I believe this because during the chapter titled, "Helping Others," this quote stood out to me. "and I never had much patience with the multitudes of people who are always ready to explain why one cannot succeed." This alone depicts what kind of person Washington set out to be even after slavery. I don't think there was any pity when reading his narrative, I think it was very informative. He seemed really proud of himself for the address he spoke of, "I delivered my message, which was one of hope and cheer; and from the bottom of my heart I thanked both races for this welcome back to the state that gave me birth." I like the question "which thinker" because both of their ideas shaped who they were as people, it shaped both of their life experiences just as you'd expect, not similar, because not everyone shares the life and there will always be different stories.

Written Assignment for Unit #1BL 240 Welcome. This is our first written assignment in BL 240. Before you begin the assignment, re-read the sections of the course syllabus (see Modules>Getting Started>Syllabus) dealing with “Written Assignments” to ensure that you understand the format (cover page plus no more than two type-written double spaced pages, content of the cover page, Code of Honor statement, etc.). You will be graded both on your response to the assignment and on having followed the directions (format). The key is to identify each legal issue (major and minor) and the general rule of law that applies to each issue. Verbiage will not be rewarded but the thoughtfulness and thoroughness of your response will be. The object is for you to show me that you understand the material in Unit 1 and can apply it to a specific fact set. Note: This is not an essay assignment. Simply list the issues (legal/ethical questions that must be addressed) and state the controlling law (or ethical principle) for each. Written Assignment #1: Kyle and his family own a successful farming and food processing business at several locations near Nauvoo in Walker County, AL (not far from Jasper, AL). The produce that they grow (vegetables and fruits) is sold under their own label, Alabama Sunshine. Kyle raises all of the produce on the family’s farms and sells it and the condiments that he makes from the produce at a roadside market that his family owns just outside of Nauvoo at the intersection of Bailey Road and Highway 5.Although his family helps run the business, like many business operations, Kyle hires temporary workers during the peak times of the planting, growing, and harvesting. He also hires temporary workers during peak production times in his condiment processing facility in Jasper, AL. As can happen during peak times, Kyle is approached by one of his regular (full-time) employees about hiring, as a temporary worker, a sister-in-law named Carla who is new to Alabama. This potential employee, Carla, would agree to work for below minimum wages, would not expect any health insurance or other benefits, and would gladly accept all earnings in cash without any deductions for social security (OASDI) or other taxes. The offer is tempting for Kyle. With the rising costs of fuel, fertilizer, and supplies, Kyle needs to cut expenses wherever and whenever possible. He could save money by hiring Carla. Since his operation is rural (primarily in Walker and Winston counties, AL), he feels that he would probably not have any problems from State or federal authorities. Kyle tries to be an ethical business person. He knows that what he is being asked to do is questionable at best and possibly illegal but it is late September; planting season for winter crops is upon him, harvest time for the fall crops is approaching quickly; and he knows that he needs the extra workers to get his crops processed and the future crops planted. Without a successful harvest and preparation for the next planting, there will be no Alabama Sunshine produce to sell and he will not be able to support his family or the regular employees.As people have grown more health conscious, demand for Kyle’s organically grown produce has increased and grocery store customers are asking for Alabama Sunshine products by name. Kyle would like to expand the retail operations to include a store along I-22, a nearby major highway that connects Birmingham, AL, and Tupelo, MS; however, he does not want to get entangled in what he considers to be “unnecessary” federal and state regulations. He knows that he could face some problems but is not sure what those problems might be.Kyle finished his business degree from UNA several years ago and he vaguely recalls Unit 1 in his BL 240 textbook, so he understands the basic issues but he trusts your knowledge and comes to you for advice and counsel. Among the many questions you must address, you ask yourself: What should Kyle consider as he ponders the relationship between “law” and “business ethics”? What factors, if any, have changed society’s concept of business ethics and the social responsibility of business enterprises? What should Kyle understand about the relationship between “maximum profits” and “optimum profits”? Kyle feels certain that the State of Alabama can regulate his business (but he’s not sure where the State gets the power to do so) and wonders if the federal government can also regulate his business. As you consider Kyle’s situation, you ponder Kyle’s best argument against federal regulation of his roadside stand and farm businesses as the operations exist now. Will he be successful in this argument? Would it make a difference if he opens a store along the highway I-22? Under what authority would the State of Alabama have an interest in Kyle’s business? What other issues might Kyle face? Note: To help you organize your thoughts, read the fact set; decide which facts are relevant and which are merely verbiage; based on the information in Unit 1, decide which information is relevant to the facts; then state the questions (issues) that you must answer to help Kyle and, for each issue, state the relevant law (general statement of the applicable law or ethical concept in your own words). You can apply the law to the issue to reach a conclusion if you like, but reaching a conclusion is not required. The key is to state clearly the questions (issues) that you must answer and state the applicable law that will guide you in answering each respective question/issue. Also note that your response to this assignment is to be submitted as an attachment via the Dropbox function, and not as an email attachment. Use Word to prepare and submit your work.