(Will give more information) MLA format Learning Objectives: Students will demonstrate their ability to construct arguments about issues of both personal and universal significance. Their writing should demonstrate that they can construct cogent, concise, and logically coherent arguments. Assessment: Students should demonstrate that they can distinguish the relevant points that form a logically coherent argument. They should also be able to construct criticisms which effectively undermine, through the use of appropriate counter-examples, some premise of that argument. Your assignment is to read any ONE of the following four articles located in the final chapter of the required textbook: The Frivolity of Evil How and How Not to Love Mankind What We Have to Lose Roads to Serfdom Then, FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you will type a 1000-1500 word response in which you address EACH of the following points IN YOUR OWN WORDS: 1) What is the author's main argument? 2) How does he support his main argument (evidence, ancillary arguments, etc.)? 3) Do you agree or disagree with him? 4) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of at least two of the readings we have studied in this course (in chapters 1-9) to your analysis. Make sure to give a substantive explanation of how the philosophers' insights are relevant to the topic you are discussing. DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK.

Abdul Hakeem was dying from AIDS. He had been in a hospice for six weeks during which time social worker/human services worker Anna had worked closely with Abdul. As she helped him prepare for the inevitable, they developed a strong relationship. Anna helped Abdul find an attorney who would prepare his will and also helped him repair his relationship with his father. The father and son had not seen each other for the past six years as both rejected the values of the other. Abdul's father was hurt and disappointed about his son's sexual orientation and Abdul was angry at his father's lack of acceptance. Their reunion had been both tearful and joyful as they realized that this would perhaps be the last time they would see each other alive. As expected, Abdul died a week later and Anna attended the funeral along with Abdul's father. The father expressed his heartfelt thanks to Anna for caring for his son and for encouraging them to end the estrangement that had kept them apart for so long. Several months following the funeral, Anna received a notice from Abdul's father that his son included her in his will. Abdul had left his home and car to Anna along with a note stating his satisfaction over the quality of care she provided. He also left various sums of money to the hospice agency and two nurses at the agency. Anna is unsure what to do in this situation. Both the nurses and the agency accepted the money but Anna is struggling with her decision. 1. What would you recommend Anna do in this situation? Ground your recommendation in any applicable section of your profession's code of Ethics.2. If Anna refused to accept the bequest, would it be appropriate for her to point out to the nurses and agency director the ethical issues involved in this situation?3. Identify which social work/human services values are involved in this case. Are any of these values or obligations in conflict with one another? 4. Apply and discuss a concept you have learned in class or from the textbook to this case.