Course Code NRS-493 Class Code NRS-493-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 80.0% Revisions Incorporated as Directed by Instructor 5.0% Background 5.0% Clinical Problem Statement 5.0% Purpose of Change Proposal 5.0% PICOT Question 5.0% Literature Search 5.0% Evaluation of Literature 5.0% Change or Nursing Theory 5.0% Implementation Plan and Outcome Measures 10.0% Use of Evidence-Based Practice in Intervention Plan 10.0% Plan for Evaluating Proposed Nursing Intervention 10.0% Potential Barriers and Plan to Overcome Barriers 10.0% Organization and Effectiveness 15.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Criteria 3Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 5.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 2.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 3.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Benchmark - Capstone Project Change Proposal 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Revision is omitted. Background of clinical problem omitted. Clinical problem statement omitted. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is omitted. PICOT questions is omitted. Literature search strategy employed omitted. Evaluation of literature omitted. Change or nursing theory omitted. Implementation plan and outcome measures are omitted. Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan omitted. Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention omitted. Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are omitted. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 300.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) Revision is incomplete. Many aspects are still incomplete, inaccurate, or unclear. Background of clinical problem is incomplete. Clinical problem statement is incomplete. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is incomplete. Topic is presented but criteria is incomplete. Topic is presented but criteria is incomplete. Evaluation of literature is incomplete. Change or nursing theory is incomplete. Implementation plan and outcome measures are presented is incomplete. Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan is incomplete. Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention is incomplete. Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are incomplete. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 3: Satisfactory (79.00%) Most key aspects were revised. Some aspects are still vague or contain minor inaccuracies. Background of clinical problem are summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Clinical problem statement is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Topic and most criteria are presented. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Topic and most criteria are presented. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Evaluation of literature is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Change or nursing theory is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Implementation plan and outcome measures are summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention is summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 4: Good (89.00%) The key aspects were revised. The revision generally improves the accuracy and clarity of the project. Background of clinical problem are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Clinical problem statement is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Topic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Topic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Evaluation of literature is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Change or nursing theory is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Implementation plan and outcome measures are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 5: Excellent (100.00%) All revisions are incorporated. The revision greatly improves the accuracy and clarity of the project. Background of clinical problem are clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident. Clinical problem statement is clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system is logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident. Topic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident. Topic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident. Comments Evaluation of literature is clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident. Change or nursing theory is logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident. Implementation plan and outcome measures are clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident. Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan is clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident. Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention is clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident. Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned 
Purchase answer to see full attachment