Description
The Directions are below...
Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan
Part 4: Research Analysis
Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.
Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Research analysis skills are therefore critical tools for your toolbox.
In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.
To Prepare:
- Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this Module's Learning Resources in support of locating and analyzing research.
- Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic in your specialty field that interests you.
- Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts described by the article.
The Assignment:
Using the “Module 4 | Part 4” section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:
- Your topic of interest.
- A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.
- Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
- Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the template
- Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.
- Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:
- Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
- Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
- Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
Running head: NURSING RESEARCH
1
Part 4: Research Analysis
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date
NURSING RESEARCH
2
Step 1: Research Analysis
Topic of Interest
Impact of Secondary Traumatization (ST) to Psychiatric Mental
Health Nurse Practitioners
Research Article
Hubbard, G. B., Beeber, L., & Eves, E. (2017). Secondary
Traumatization in Psychiatric Mental Health Nurses: Validation of
Five Key Concepts. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 53(2), 119-126.
Retrieved 18 July 2020 from
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26602053/
Professional
Secondary traumatization (ST) is the accumulation of behavioral and
Practice Use
cognitive symptoms from continuous exposure to clients' traumatic
experiences. Hubbard et al. (2017) conducted a study to verify whether
the narrative recorded by three psychiatrists correspond with the five
basic concepts of ST, which are exposure, susceptibility, empathic,
engagement, response, and alteration. The analysis of the five elements
described nurses’ risk factors, environment of care, and the trauma of
the patient that enable ST to develop. Professionally, the ST concept is
used to illustrate the factors that may limit nurses’ ability to provide
quality care and maintain a work-life balance.
Strengths of
Limitations of
Relevancy to
the Research
the Research
Topic of
Notes
Interest
The study
The study's
The research is
There is a
Research Analysis
adopted a
major limitation
releva...
