Allocate at least 4 hours to complete this field experience.Assist your mentor teacher with teaching a minimum of two social studies lessons being taught in a 1-8 setting. Take note of the use or non-use of a social studies text within your experience, as well as how the mentor teacher differentiates the instruction. After the teaching experience, speak with your mentor teacher about how he or she differentiates instruction to address the learning needs of the students in a class.In addition, after your teaching experience, review the social studies textbook and other materials and resources that were used to teach the lessons. (If the class does not use a textbook, then focus only on the materials and resources that were used.) Analyze the text, materials, and resources to determine if opportunities or supports are provided for teachers to address cultural relevance and differentiated learning, or if teachers are expected to develop these on their own.Write a 250-500 word reflection that summarizes your teaching experience, the discussion with your mentor teacher, and your analysis of the textbook and materials. Specifically address where you observed, or saw a need for:Differentiated instruction and instructional materials for individual students with particular learning differences or needs.Incorporation of students’ experiences, cultures, and community resources into social studies instruction.In addition, be sure to explain how you will use your findings in your future professional practice.APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. Free of plagiarism.

Despite the careful and tedious process of rulemaking, there is always going to be someone who is unhappy with the regulation in its entirety. Accordingly, the door is always open for reform; a chance to improve the regulation by altering it, or by somehow correcting perceived errors. In essence, reform will change the condition of the current administrative law. Can you reflect on the number of times that this has happened recently? Is it easier to reform that which is flawed, or is it better to just start from the beginning?Select one of the following situations:You are an appointed member of the White House Special Council staff.You are an international analyst (outside of the United States).To complete the Assignment:In the role you selected, draft a 3- to 4-page immigration reform, economic trade, environmental, or human trafficking proposal regarding a rule that the president or nation is seeking to change.Your proposal should include the Bluebook citation of the rule the president or the nation is seeking to reform, as well as a persuasive argument for the need for reform of the rule.Support your position using a minimum of 4 scholarly resources.NOTE: Make sure to include a reference list.READINGS Harrington, C. B., & Carter, L. H. (2015). Administrative law & politics: Cases and comments (5th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press. Appendix E, “The Constitution of the United States of America” Harvard Law Review Association, et al. (Eds.). (2015). The Bluebook: A uniform system of citation(20th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Author. Rule 10 Ingber, R. (2016). International law constraints as executive power. Harvard International Law Journal, 57(1), 50–110. Kim, K. (2014). The separation of powers principle: Is it a lynchpin or pushpin for the voyage of American public? International Journal of Advanced Research, 2(8), 887–895. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kiyoung_Kim5/publication/268642533_The_Separation_of_Powers_Principle_Is_it_a_Lynchpin_or_Pushpin_for_the_Voyage_of_American_Public/links/5472e0160cf2d67fc035cf77.pdf Medsker, R. S., & McDorman, T. F. (2016). Maintaining institutional power and constitutional principles: A rhetorical analysis of United States v. Nixon. Speaker & Gavel, 41(1), 1–19. Retrieved from http://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1110&context=speaker-gavel United States House of Representatives v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell, et al. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.speaker.gov/sites/speaker.house.gov/files/HouseLitigation.pdf Yoo, J. (2015). Judicial supremacy has its limits. Texas Review of Law & Politics, 20(1), 2–27. WEBSITEThe White House. (n.d.). Retrieved June 27, 2016, from https://www.whitehouse.gov/Note: Use this resource to locate presidential directives.Optional Resources Belco, M. H. (2013). Power or persuasion: Unilateral orders and the legislative process. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association 2013 annual meeting, Chicago, IL. Bradley, C. A., & Morrison, T. W. (2013). Presidential power, historical practice, and legal constraint. Columbia Law Review , 113(4), 1097–1161. Khan, Z. A., & Sabir, M. (2013). President vs. Congress in U.S. foreign policy: Cooperation or confrontation. Journal of Political Studies, 20(1), 143–158. Silva, R. L. (2014). Reckoning RLUIPA’s substantial burden provision—A sliding scale approach. John Marshall Law Journal, 8, 127.