Paula Plaintiffs Really Bad Week and Cash Mart Part 1 Case Study Analysis

User Generated

Kfr22

Business Finance

Description

PAULA PLAINTIFF'S REALLY BAD WEEK, PART 1

INTRODUCTION

In this assignment, you’ll need to decide whether Paula Plaintiff has any legal claims arising from a series of unfortunate events. After reading the scenario, answer the questions that follow, making sure to fully explain the basis of your decision.

Paula Plaintiff is shopping at her favorite store, Cash Mart. She is looking for a new laptop, but she can’t find one she likes. Then, realizing that she is going to be late for an appointment, she attempts to leave the store, walking very fast. However, before she can leave, she is stopped by a security guard who accuses her of shoplifting. Paula, who has taken nothing, denies any wrong doing. The officer insists and takes Paula to a small room in the back of the store. The guard tells Paula that if she attempts to leave the room she will be arrested and sent to jail. At this point, the guard leaves the room. Paula is scared and waits in the room for over an hour until the manager comes in and apologizes and tells Paula that she is free to go.

About this same time, Geoffrey Golfer is hitting golf balls in his backyard. Geoffrey decides to break out his new driver and hits a golf ball out of his backyard into the Cash Mart parking lot. The golf ball hits Paula Plaintiff on the head and knocks her unconscious just as she is leaving the store.

INSTRUCTIONS

In a 6–10 paragraph paper, answer the following questions:

  • What types of legal claims could Paula make against Cash Mart and Geoffrey? Consider the following:
    • What are the possible tort claims that Paula can make against Cash Mart? Discuss the elements of the claim and how those elements relate to the facts in the scenario.
    • Was Geoffrey negligent when he hit the golf ball that injured Paula? Discuss the elements of negligence and use facts from the scenario to support your decision.
    • If Paula files a negligence claim against Geoffrey will she file in civil court or criminal court? Explain the difference between civil court and criminal court.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: UNDERSTANDING CASES

1

Understanding Cases
Name
Professor
Course
Date

UNDERSTANDING CASES

2
Understanding Cases

Paula has had a series of unfortunate events while at Cashmart which have culminated in
her being injured and being unconscious. The facts presented show that there is some
compensation for the injuries that Paula can receive using legal means. In the case presented, the
defamation of character and tort of negligence are two possible cases that Paul can make against
Cashmart and Geoffrey respectively.
To begin with, the case against Cashmart is a defamation case. This is a case that looks at
an action that has an injury towards the reputation of an individual. This can be both written or
oral statements or arguments (Cornell Law, n.d.). There are various aspects that the case has to
consider. Paula has to prove a false statement...


Anonymous
Just the thing I needed, saved me a lot of time.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags