Course Code BHS-450 Class Code BHS-450-O500 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Etiology of the Symptoms 10.0% Evaluation and Assessment 10.0% Symptoms 10.0% Interventions 15.0% Co-Occurring Clusters Symptoms and Features 10.0% Co-Occurring Symptoms 15.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Case Study: Jeremy and Leonard Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Essay omits or incompletely describes the etiology of the possible symptoms presented in the case study. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Essay omits or incompletely describes how Jeremy and Leonard might be evaluated or assessed to determine the level and severity of symptoms presented in the case study. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Essay omits or incompletely describes the symptoms that are identified in the case study related to attention-deficit (ADD) attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) and learning disabilities. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Essay omits or incompletely describes the steps you would you take for interventions addressing the symptoms to help the two students identified in the case study. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Essay omits or incompletely describes the co-occurring clusters for childhood and adolescence symptoms and features presented in the case study. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Essay omits or incompletely describes at least two possible cooccurring symptoms that the students in the case study may present in each of the areas for ADD, ADHD, and learning disabilities. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 90.0 Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) Essay inadequately describes the etiology of the possible symptoms presented in the case study, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. Essay inadequately describes how Jeremy and Leonard might be evaluated or assessed to determine the level and severity of symptoms presented in the case study, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. Essay inadequately describes the symptoms that are identified in the case study related to attention-deficit (ADD) attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) and learning disabilities, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. Essay inadequately describes the steps you would you take for interventions addressing the symptoms to help the two students identified in the case study, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. Essay inadequately describes the co-occurring clusters for childhood and adolescence symptoms and features presented in the case study, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. Essay inadequately describes at least two possible cooccurring symptoms that the students in the case study may present in each of the areas for ADD, ADHD, and learning disabilities, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (75.00%) Essay adequately describes the etiology of the possible symptoms presented in the case study, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Essay adequately describes how Jeremy and Leonard might be evaluated or assessed to determine the level and severity of symptoms presented in the case study, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Essay adequately describes the symptoms that are identified in the case study related to attention-deficit (ADD) attentiondeficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) and learning disabilities, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Essay adequately describes the steps you would you take for interventions addressing the symptoms to help the two students identified in the case study, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Essay adequately describes the co-occurring clusters for childhood and adolescence symptoms and features presented in the case study, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Essay adequately describes at least two possible co-occurring symptoms that the students in the case study may present in each of the areas for ADD, ADHD, and learning disabilities, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (85.00%) Essay clearly describes the etiology of the possible symptoms presented in the case study, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. Essay clearly describes how Jeremy and Leonard might be evaluated or assessed to determine the level and severity of symptoms presented in the case study, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. Essay clearly describes the symptoms that are identified in the case study related to attention-deficit (ADD) attentiondeficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) and learning disabilities, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. Essay clearly describes the steps you would you take for interventions addressing the symptoms to help the two students identified in the case study, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. Essay clearly describes the co-occurring clusters for childhood and adolescence symptoms and features presented in the case study, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. Essay clearly describes at least two possible co-occurring symptoms that the students in the case study may present in each of the areas for ADD, ADHD, and learning disabilities, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) Essay expertly describes the etiology of the possible symptoms presented in the case study, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. Essay expertly describes how Jeremy and Leonard might be evaluated or assessed to determine the level and severity of symptoms presented in the case study, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. Essay expertly describes the symptoms that are identified in the case study related to attention-deficit (ADD) attentiondeficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) and learning disabilities, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. Essay expertly describes the steps you would you take for interventions addressing the symptoms to help the two students identified in the case study, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. Essay expertly describes the co-occurring clusters for childhood and adolescence symptoms and features presented in the case study, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. Essay expertly describes at least two possible co-occurring symptoms that the students in the case study may present in each of the areas for ADD, ADHD, and learning disabilities, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic. Comments Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned BHS-450 Case Study Formulation Template Please use the case study template as an outline for each area of the case study that you are writing. The case study assignment will help synthesize the practice of concepts from the course. Use the case study assigned to the topic, the assignment description, and include the following: 1. Identify the level of care (location or environment) where you are meeting with the client: 2. Demographic Information of the client: age, gender, grade in school, family member, living environment, etc.: 3. Presenting symptoms of both substance misuse and mental health issues: 4. Current DSM diagnosis: 5. Co-occurring symptoms: 6. Treatment interventions used and the therapeutic modality for treatment types: 7. Treatment recommendations for the client: © 2016. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Purchase answer to see full attachment