Need assistance! Thank you!The iterative process in the doctoral journey is invaluable to the novice scholar. The iterative process involves the ongoing interactive participation of learner and instructor (later chair and committee) in reading, writing, specific instructor feedback, reflection, and revision. In this assignment, you will reflect on the written work you submitted in Topic 2 and the feedback provided by the instructor to create a revised version of “Leader/Context Interaction and Theory Applicability,” and make appropriate revisions based on that feedback. This assignment will offer the opportunity to experience the scholarly interaction and collaborative climate that you will experience with your doctoral chair-to-be.General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:Refer to your submission of the Topic 2 assignment “Leader/Context Interaction and Theory Applicability.”This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.Refer to Chapters 2-4 of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.) for specific guidelines related to doctoral level writing. These chapters contain essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.Scholarly research resources only with permalink. Please refer to rubric. Additional information attached.Directions: Part 1Present a revised version (1,500-1,800 words total) of the paper “Leader/Context Interaction and Theory Applicability” that makes improvements in the caliber of the writing and incorporates instructor feedback regarding content and writing. Include the following in your submission:A reflection (250-300 words) that provides a bulleted list of the changes you made to the paper and discusses your revision process including how you incorporated your instructor's feedback into the revised version. Similar to an abstract, this section will receive its own page following the title page and preceding the introduction to the paper.The revised paper that incorporates instructor feedback; clarifies the thesis statement and solidifies supporting arguments; edits for grammar, spelling, and punctuation; adjusts word choice to display professional and scholarly language; and adjusts sentence structure for improved readability.Part 2Write and additional 1,000-1,250 words in which you analyze the nature of groupthink and its relationship to the leader, and then suggest means for leaders to mitigate groupthink. This section should flow naturally from the revised paper. So, you may also need to revise your introduction and thesis statement to allow the ideas to connect. Your paper must include the following:An analysis of the nature of groupthink. What is it? How does it occur?An analysis of the relationship between groupthink and the leader. Do some leadership styles lend more easily to the rise of groupthink? How does groupthink influence the decision making of the leader?Research-based suggestions for leaders to mitigate groupthink. What should the leader do to prevent or counteract groupthink?

Write an essay of 250-500 words, explaining why there is prevalence among alcohol and/or drug users for HIV/AIDS infection. Include the following in your paper:The relationship between substance use and HIV/AIDS infection, including risk factors associated with themWhy a substance use disorder and HIV/AIDS could be considered as co-occurring disordersInclude at least one scholarly reference in your paper.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Response to MIkeAn explanation of how social and emotional intelligence are related to cultural factors.Different cultures have different values; thus, an understanding of how different cultures need to be addressed regarding their customs and courtesies is important. Having cultural competence is a most if a worker is trying to get an individual understand that they are not in control of their emotional intelligence. A worker has to be careful not to assume that everyone within a culture practices the values of the culture.An explanation about how you, as a social worker, might apply the concepts of emotional and/or social intelligence to the case of AndresIn the Andres case, Mr. Andres let his emotions get the better of him. His hate for having to ask for help when ambulating around the house, “compromised his balance, and he had several bad falls” (Plummer, Makris, & Brocksen, 2014). His depression and anxiety isolated him to the point that he lost contact with all his close friends. When using emotional intelligence, Mr. Andres would need assistant in managing and understanding his emotions. His depression and anxiety only create more stress which is not good for his overall health. I would help him to think more rationally about the situations that cause him to be angry. For a theoretical orientation, I would use the cognitive processing therapy model. This model is like CBT in a lot of ways, but it gives a rating on how bad or good the emotions are during a situation. I think by Mr. Andres assessing his emotions, and finding out his stuck points because of the emotions, will help him to develop a more positive emotion intelligence. According to García-Sancho, Salguero, & Fernández-Berrocal (2014) the “trait emotional intelligence questionnaire” (used to to estimate the degree to which client possesses certain emotional abilities) and the “Mayer- Salovey–Caruso emotional intelligence test (a performance test because it requires individuals to solve tasks, and it is an objective test because there are better and worse answers on it, as determined by consensus or expert scoring) are excellent assessment tools to objectively determine Mr. Andres emotional intelligence (pg. 585). Inadvertently, this would help with his social intelligence because he would become more socially aware of how to interact within the social environments that he had been neglecting.An explanation of how social workers, in general, might apply social and emotional intelligence to social work practice. (Include a specific example in the explanation.)When working with families’ social workers must try to understand the cultural factors when trying to assess and implement a plan. For example, according to Kirst-Ashman & Hull (2012) when providing interventions for a Hispanic family, a worker should not try to “increase the independence (or reduce the dependency) of individual family members” (pg. 456). Rather when incorporating social intelligence, individualism should occur within the context of the family in a traditional Hispanic family.If a worker is trying to help a client to become more emotional intelligent, the worker will have to help the client understand how to manage their (the client) emotions so that the client’s emotions do not take control of them. I have been in situations when I thought I had all the facts about an event, and come to find out, I was wrong. However, prior to finding out I was wrong I got angry and I start to make accusations that were not true. If I could have took a step back, got my emotions under control, I might have been able to gather all the facts instead of communicating with emotions (anger).ReferenceGarcía-Sancho, E., Salguero, J., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2014). Relationship between emotional intelligence and aggression: A systematic review. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 19(5), 584-591. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.007Kirst-Ashman, K. K., & Hull, G. H., Jr. (2012). Understanding generalist practice (6th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning. DiagnosePlummer, S. -B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. M. (Eds.). (2014). Social work case studies: Foundation year. Baltimore, MD: Laureate International Universities PublishingMUST have 2 APA peer reviwed references