Assignment: Leadership in FluxPower and politics, and conflict and negotiation are essential elements in organizational leadership today. It’s important to understand how to lead through these elements to build a positive and successful organization.Power and leadership are key functions in an organization. Good leaders utilize positive power and communication structures to effectively manage and develop their employees. This all leads to a healthy and productive workplace.The following Course Outcome is assessed in this Assignment:MT302-5: Examine the role of the communication and leadership process in relationship to employee effectiveness.Read the scenario regarding the communication and leadership processes used regarding the employee’s effectiveness.Scenario (fictional): Fameit Inc. (FI) is a manufacturing company that produces customized frames using all sorts of materials to create frames for certificates, pictures, paintings, etc., all over the world. There are 100 employees that are divided between manufacturing and sales representatives with about 20 staff assigned to managerial/administrative positions in the various departments. About two months ago, the head of production, Nicolas (in his position for the last 5 years), was in a meeting with his staff when the following conversation occurred:Production Manager Nicolas says at the end of a half-hour meeting to review the production schedule results: “Does anyone have anything to add concerning operations today?”Production employee Berta: “Well, we are having some problems in production because some of our vendor acrylics are changing composition and are not resulting in the best quality of product when they come off the line. Someone needs to speak with our vendor.”Production Manager Nicolas: “Anyone else have that problem?” (He waits for 3 seconds for any response and then continues.) “Thanks everyone, I guess that wraps up this meeting. Now back to work!”After a week the Production Manager began to receive reports from the database system that quality control was rejecting some of the final products off the assembly line. In addition, customer complaints and returns now had gotten to the critical point, and executive management had been alerted.The production manager had a special meeting of his department that same day and admonished the production team saying:“It is your responsibility to see that these products pass quality control. If there is a problem you are to contact me. I hold you all responsible for this lapse in reporting this problem. I will decide shortly who will be working with me to resolve this issue.”The production employee Berta just looked at her colleagues and said, “But boss, I did bring this up at the last meeting.”The Production Manager responded: “Well, if there was a problem as important as this one, you should have sent a follow-up memo to everyone.” Looking at Berta he continued, “Someone may be losing their job over this!” Then he adjourned the meeting.Production employee Berta speaking to another employee after the meeting:“I absolutely should not lose my job over this; I told him there was a problem. I am going to lodge a complaint with Human Resources right away.”Checklist: Respond to the following items regarding the scenario and the leadership and communication processes you learned about through your Reading and Learning Activities.Analyze the problems at this company as portrayed in the scenario.Describe the leadership style demonstrated by the manager.Describe the steps in the communication process that were not addressed or completed and how they were not completed or addressed.Explain the aspects of the leadership process that were neglected by the manager.Examine and explain how the manager could have used the communication and leadership process to (1) build a better relationship with the employees in his department and (2) make employees more effective on the job.Submit your minimum 2–3 page expository essay with an additional title and references page in APA format and citation style to the Dropbox.Access the rubric

For this Assignment, you will use the SPSS data file provided to conduct an analysis of the construct validity (divergent and convergent validity) of the OCEAN measures. Assume that the following research questions and associated hypotheses have been developed based on the theory of personality associated with the OCEAN measure. In addition, the researcher has a measure of personality type that was also completed by the people in the sample. After conducting the analyses, you will summarize your conclusions in terms whether or not these analyses provide evidence of validity of the OCEAN measures.RQ1: Males will demonstrate higher levels of Extroversion than females.Ho1: There is not a significant positive correlation between gender and the OCEAN measure of Extroversion.Ha1: There is a significant positive correlation between gender and the OCEAN measure of Extroversion.RQ2: The OCEAN measure of Extroversion will correlate with an external measure of Extroversion from a measure of personality type.Ho2: There is not a significant positive correlation between the OCEAN measure of Extroversion and a measure of Extroversion from a measure of personality type.Ha2: There is a significant positive correlation between the OCEAN measure of Extroversion and a measure of Extroversion from a measure of personality type. The OCEAN measure of Conscientiousness should not be related to other measures derived from a measure of personality type.Ho3: There are no significant correlations for the remaining OCEAN measures (Openness, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism) with the remaining measures of personality type (Sensing/Intuition, Thinking/Feeling, and Judging/Perceiving).Ha3: There are significant correlations for the remaining OCEAN measures (Openness, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism) with the remaining measures of personality type (Sensing/Intuition, Thinking/Feeling, and Judging/Perceiving).To prepare for this Assignment:Review the Learning Resources about validity. Focus on how to evaluate a measure for construct validity.Read the assigned pages in the SPSS Instructions on how to compute and display construct validity analyses.Use the table from the SPSS Instructions to properly organize, format, and present your construct validity analysis.By Day 7Submit a 2- to 3-page paper (not including references) that addresses the following:Conduct a correlations analysis of gender with the OCEAN measures and the four measures of personality type. Then, present the results in an APA Style correlation table.Interpret the correlations for the research questions and explain what conclusions you can draw about the validity of the OCEAN measure. If you are unfamiliar with type theory, please review the optional reading for this week.Note: Support your Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You are to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this course.ResourcesCarmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979).Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences: Reliability and validity assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412985642Furr, R. (2011). Evaluating psychometric properties: dimensionality and reliability. In Furr, R. The Sage Library of Methods in Social and Personality Psychology: Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology (pp. 25-51). London: SAGE Publications Ltd doi: 10.4135/9781446287866Furr, R. (2011). Generalizability theory. In Furr, R. The Sage Library of Methods in Social and Personality Psychology: Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology (pp. 110-125). London: SAGE Publications Ltd doi: 10.4135/9781446287866Furr, R. (2011). Threats to psychometric quality. In Furr, R. The Sage Library of Methods in Social and Personality Psychology: Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology (pp. 67-76). London: SAGE Publications Ltd doi: 10.4135/9781446287866Gao, X., & Harris, D. J. (2012). Generalizability theory. In H. M. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics (pp. 661–681). American Psychological Association. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1037/136... Moyle, P., & Hackston, J. (2018). Personality assessment for employee development: Ivory tower or real world? Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(5), 507–517. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1080/002...