MGMT 436 ERAU Strategic Audit Report Visa Discussion

User Generated

pebff34

Writing

mgmt 436

Embry Riddle Aeronautical University

MGMT

Description

Hello,

Here are the instructions for this assignment:

This

module week starts the planning of your Strategic Audit Report. The

Strategic Audit Report will enable you to gain an understanding of a

business's strategic position, financial posture, leadership team, the

internal and external environment that impacts them, and corporate

resources (which includes marketing, finance, human resources,

information technology, and other elements).

By Module 8 you will compile and submit all of the information for your report, which will then be implemented it into a formatted strategic audit plan to help identify issues that need to be corrected and provide a forward-thinking strategy that best meets the needs of the business.

Complete Your Deliverable

Select a business to research and write an introductory overview to use as part of the strategic audit report that you will create throughout the term. Do not use an organization you have researched in another course; use only original research and material.

It is recommended you select a publicly traded company (stocks) for your strategic audit company. Public traded companies are required to make all of their financial information and board of director’s information available to the general public, which makes it easier for you to collect the data needed for your strategic audit report.

Your Introduction Overview should include the following:

  • The name of your business.
  • History and background of the business.
  • Detail of what the business does and who they do it for.
  • Use a minimum of two (2) outside sources.

Review the Strategic Audit Report Guidelines page before submitting your topic selection.

Submit Your Results

  • This section should be one (1) full page in length.
  • The document should be double-spaced, correctly cited and referenced, using current APA formatting.

Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.

Your paper will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin when you submit your assignment in this activity. Turnitin is a service that checks your work for improper citation or potential plagiarism by comparing it against a database of web pages, student papers, and articles from academic books and publications. Ensure that your work is entirely your own and that you have not plagiarized any material!

Your final deliverable for the Strategic Audit Report will include the tasks you complete each module week. Use the summary report provided by Turnitin as additional feedback to improve your final report.

MGMT 436 1.5 Strategic Audit Report Rubric

MGMT 436 1.5 Strategic Audit Report Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identification and Analysis of the Main Issues/Problem

25.0 pts (Excellent - A) Identifies and understands all of the main issues in question. Insightful, and thorough analysis of all the issues.

20.0 pts (Above-Average - B) Identifies and understands most of the main issues in question. Thorough analysis of most of the issues.

15.0 pts (Average - C) Identifies and understands some of the issues in question. Superficial analysis of some of the issues in question.

10.0 pts (Near-Failing - D) Identifies and understands few of the issues in question. Incomplete analysis of the issues.

0.0 pts (Failing - F) Identifies and understands very little of the issues in question. No analysis of the issues.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answers to Questions

20.0 pts (Excellent - A) Answers to questions are clear throughout. Connection with class and study material goes well beyond the obvious connections among ideas; demonstrates insight and original thinking.

15.0 pts (Above-Average - B) Answers to questions present some irrelevant information on topic etc., but very little; treatment goes beyond obvious connections with class and study material.

10.0 pts (Average - C) Answers to questions are vague in places; some irrelevant or distracting information.

5.0 pts (Near-Failing - D) Answers to questions are unclear and/or confusing. Treatment is very superficial; paper may be well written but says nothing.

0.0 pts (Failing - F) Does not address the questions. Treatment is very superficial and says very little.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Strategy Choice and Justification

20.0 pts (Excellent - A) An appropriate, reasonable strategy is selected and successfully developed. Content knowledge is used correctly. Justifies the strategy, conclusion, and/or answer to the problem.

15.0 pts (Above-Average - B) An appropriate, reasonable strategy is selected and moderately developed. Content knowledge used appropriately, with minor computation errors. Justifies the strategy, conclusion, and/or answer, but leaves out details.

10.0 pts (Average - C) An appropriate, reasonable strategy is selected, but minimally developed. Uses content knowledge with conceptual errors. Attempts to justify the strategy, conclusion, and/or answer, but the justification is only somewhat relevant to the problem.

5.0 pts (Near-Failing - D) There is an attempt to solve the problem. Barely any strategy is applied that could lead to an answer. Rarely uses content knowledge. Attempts justification for the strategy, conclusion, and/or answer, but there is no relevance or connection.

0.0 pts (Failing - F) There is no attempt to solve the problem. No strategy is applied that could lead to an answer. Uses no content knowledge. Does not attempt justification for the strategy, conclusion, and/or answer.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Links to Course Readings and Additional Research

20.0 pts (Excellent - A) Excellent research into the issues with clearly documented links to class (and/or outside) readings.

15.0 pts (Above-Average - B) Good research and documented links to the material read.

10.0 pts (Average - C) Limited research and documented links to any readings.

5.0 pts (Near-Failing - D) Incomplete research and links to any readings.

0.0 pts (Failing - F) Provided no references or support of analysis.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communication, Style and Mechanics

15.0 pts (Excellent - A) Solution is presented in a clear and orderly manner so the reader can follow the flow of the solution and final answer. Chooses words for their precise meaning and uses an appropriate level of specificity. Sentence style fits audience and purpose. Sentences clearly structured and carefully focused. Almost entirely free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors.

12.5 pts (Above-Average - B) Solution is presented appropriately, but may contain a minor error. Reader can follow most of the steps in the solution and final answer. Generally uses words accurately and effectively, but may be too general. Sentences generally clear, structured, and focused, though some may be awkward or ineffective. May contain a few errors, which may annoy the reader but not impede understanding.

8.0 pts (Average - C) Solution is presented appropriately, but contains conceptual errors. Solution is presented in an unclear manner. Scorer has difficulty following the sequence of steps. Uses relatively vague and general words, may use some inappropriate language. Sentence’s structure generally correct, but sentences may be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing. Usually contains several mechanical errors, which may temporarily confuse the reader but not impede the overall understanding.

4.0 pts (Near-Failing - D) Presents the problem in an unclear manner, steps are missing or out of sequence. Scorer cannot determine a sequence of steps. Tends to being vague and abstract, or very personal and specific. Usually contains several awkward or ungrammatical sentences; sentence structure is simple or monotonous. Usually contains either many mechanical errors or a few important errors that block the reader's understanding and ability to see connections between thoughts.

0.0 pts (Failing - F) Does not present the problem in a manner that can be deciphered. Misuse of words throughout. Awkward sentences throughout. Difficult to attach a thought process. Poorly punctuated, misspelled words, grammatically abusive.

15.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0


User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: STRATEGIC AUDIT REPORT: VISA

Strategic Audit Report: Visa
Name
Institution

1

STRATEGIC AUDIT REPORT: VISA

2

Strategic Audit Report: Visa
Commonly abbreviated as Visa, the Verified International Stay Approval functions as the
conventional authorization company that allows foreign individuals to stay in the United States.
Visa Inc. exists as a multinational US-based company that functions by providing financial and
payment services to its esteemed clients (Zucarro & Bridwell, 2016). Visa Inc. ...


Anonymous
I was stuck on this subject and a friend recommended Studypool. I'm so glad I checked it out!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags