Must be original, no plagiarism. Must have references. No Wikipedia. Need this by the afternoon of September 23.Review the article, Race, poverty and punishment: The impact of criminal sanctions on racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic inequality, as you to prepare for this paper. As Wheelock and Uggen (2006) point out, “the association between crime, punishment, and poverty has long been the subject of sociological and criminological investigation” (p. 1). This assignment is intended illustrate the interconnection of social problems.Write a paper discussing the overlap of crime, punishment, and poverty. In your paper, please explain the following five core arguments made by the authors:Criminal sanctions and victimization work to form a system of disadvantage that perpetuates stratification and poverty.Punishment impacts individuals convicted of felonies, as well as their families, peer groups, neighborhoods, and racial group.After controlling for population differences, African Americans are incarcerated approximately seven times as often as Whites.Variation in criminal punishment is linked to economic deprivation.As the number of felons and former felons rises, collateral sanctions play an ever-larger role in racial and ethnic stratification, operating as an interconnected system of disadvantage.Academic Research Reminder: Academic research papers must meet university level standards of quality recognized by the academic community. What constitutes quality, academic research?Primary (original) sources written by experts in the field of study.Secondary sources supported by research in primary sources.Credible sources (experts in the field; well-known theorists; sources which use primary and secondary sources to support claims).Relevant research (materials are pertinent to the area of study).In graduate work, the use of peer-reviewed journal articles (journal articles reviewed by recognized experts in the relevant field of study) is required.Educational and government websites (those ending with a web URL suffix of .edu or .gov) may be appropriate in some cases but should be evaluated carefully.The paper must be three to four pages in length and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least two scholarly resources other than the textbook and required readings to support your claims and subclaims. Cite your resources in text and on the reference page.Carefully review the Grading Rubic attached for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment. week three grading rubic.docx 

Discussion Question: Role of the Counselor in the Community Nine-year-old Wanda’s teacher notices that for the past few weeks, Wanda has not been talking to her friends and is always sitting alone in a corner. After talking to Wanda’s friends, the teacher finds out that Wanda’s 16-year-old brother was killed in a gang war two months ago and her parents have since separated. The teacher talks to Daphne, a counselor, to see if there is anything she can do about Wanda. She wants to know if there is any way in which children and families affected by exposure to violence can be assisted with emotional impact of these events. The teacher also asks Daphne, in the role of a counselor, to call Wanda’s parents to see if they would be willing to talk with her about the death of their son, their separation, and Wanda’s behavior at school. Daphne is not employed or affiliated with the school. What would be Daphne’s role, as a counselor, in helping the teacher? What do you see as important roles of a counselor working in a community? What are the ethical responsibilities that counselors and human service professionals hold toward the community? When answering this question identify the ethical code number and definition, using your own words, of the ethical responsibilities of these professionals. Briefly speak to how you, as an ethical counselor, would respond to the teacher’s request for you to speak with Wanda and her family. Discussion Grading Criteria Maximum Points Initial Discussion Response 16 Discussion Participation 16 Writing Craftsmanship and Ethical Scholarship 8 Total: 40 Unsatisfactory Emerging Proficient Exemplary Initial Discussion Response * Initial response: ·  Did not relate to the concepts or ideas presented in the discussion topic(s) ·  Claims were not supported. Initial response: ·  Lacked substance ·  Was not original ·  Relied on personal experience only to support ideas Initial response was: ·  Original and accurate ·  Substantive ·  Demonstrated basic understanding of concepts ·  Discussed key theories and concepts from the readings Initial response was: ·  Insightful ·  Original and accurate ·  Substantive and ·  Demonstrated advanced understanding of concepts  ·  Compiled/synthesized theories and concepts drawn from a variety of sources to support statements and conclusions. Discussion Participation * Discussion Responses: Were off-topic or irrelevant to discussion. Discussion Responses: Contributed a few points of view but mostly repeats information posted by others. Discussion Responses: ·  Contributed to the discussion offering points of view and/or opinions, ·  Did not make clear connections between one or more points in the discussion. Discussion Responses: ·  Offered points of view supported by research ·  Asked challenging questions that promoted discussion ·  Drew relationships between one or more points in the discussion. Writing Craftsmanship and Ethical Scholarship * ·  Demonstrated little attempt to organize thoughts ·  Writing was not clear, concise and formal. ·  Writing contained numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interfered with readability and comprehension. ·  Information from sources was not paraphrased and attribution of sources was lacking. ·  Demonstrated some attempt to organize thoughts ·  Writing was not clear, concise and/or formal. ·  Errors in spelling and grammar somewhat interfered with readability and/or comprehension. ·  Information from sources was paraphrased and cited, but major errors were present.  ·  Wrote in a clear and organized manner ·  Writing was not concise or formal in language. ·  Writing followed conventions of spelling and grammar throughout.  Errors were infrequent and did not interfere with readability or comprehension. ·  Information from sources was paraphrased and cited, but minor errors were present.  ·  Wrote in a clear, concise, formal and organized manner.  ·  Responses were error free. ·  Information from sources was paraphrased appropriately and accurately cited.

Standard 6- Record Keeping and FeesSelect two specific codes from APA standard 6: Record Keeping and Fees (6.01–6.07), and provide an original case study example to illustrate an ethical dilemma which could arise for each code (two total).Describe how you would resolve each dilemma as per the APA guidelines, and see if you can pinpoint any similarities or differences within the APA and BACB guidelines for this standard.Read unit 7 Title: Ethics for Behavior Analysts, 2nd Expanded EditionAuthor: Bailey, J., & Burch, M.ISBN: 9780415880305Publisher: Routledge, Taylor and Francis