Which account of the meeting between Atahualpa and the Spanish do you think is correct? Why? What are the biases of each account? How do the assigned primary source readings for today help you to think through your assessment of Atahualpa and Valverde?I attached the PPT for this prompt. and the rubric for grading.About 4-500 words.

Mod 8 Assignment: Racism on the WWII Homefront1919 unread replies.1919 replies.In the style of our textbook author, Eric Foner, we started this module with a look at some of the abstract ideas driving American entry into World War II (like the "Four Freedoms" that Roosevelt said were threatened by the Axis, especially Germany and Japan). In this assignment, we'll pivot to the experience of the WWII home front to judge whether ideas like the Four Freedoms applied evenly to the American people. As Foner has hinted in previous chapters, things are never quite what they seem, particularly for immigrants, African-Americans, people of color, etc.In recognition that many of you are still writing the Midterm Essay this week, notice that you are again only responsible for two response posts to other students. I've also centered this assignment on watching videos. All the videos below are available on YouTube and have closed captions. They are all roughly two to five minutes long.Assignment InstructionsStep 1: Watch the videos below. Step 2: Reply to PromptUsing this week's videos and images, respond to the prompt below in a 150- to 250-word discussion post. No formal citations necessary, but do reference the sources to support your ideas. You don't have to answer all the questions, just the ones that get you writing.Prompt: Did everyone in the US have access to Roosevelt's "Four Freedoms"? What do the above sources say about ideas about race, ethnicity, and belonging in the US during the war? How can we reconcile the American ideas language of equality used to fight Nazi racism with the home front experiences and societal treatment of people of color, particularly black Americans, the Indigenous, Asians and Asian-Americans, and Mexican and Mexican-Americans? (We won't really talk about people descended from or immigrating from Central and South American until after the 1950s-- the US and Europe still have a lot of Cold War destabilizing to do in the region before we see increased US immigration from beyond Mexico). Step 3: Reply to Two (2) PeersIn a short paragraph between 50 and 100 words, add further supporting details or respectfully disagree with the post's author using evidence from this week's readings.Respond to as many peers as you like, but you must respond to at least two coursemates.Please reply to peers who do not yet have replies so that all are included in the conversation.How to participate: A few tips for this assignment:Press "Reply" to add your own, individual reply to the discussion board.To reply to your peers' posts, press reply under their specific post.Coursemates' posts will become visible once you have posted to the discussion board.For discussion assignments, it is recommended that you compose your posts in a word processor so that you can copy and paste into your discussion posts. BE AWARE: There is no Save function for discussion posts.

 read and reflect on the following article. The article may be located by clicking on the “The CIP Report: September 4014” link on the Past Issues Catalog page: Mueller, J., & Stewart M. G. (2014, September). A risk Assessment of the FBI's counterterrorism efforts. The CIP Report, 13(2). Retrieved from http://cip.gmu.edu/the-cip-report/past-issues-cata... In this article, the authors lay out a simple, back-of-the-envelope approach for evaluating the costs and benefits of counterterrorism spending that uses only four variables: the consequences of a successful attack, the likelihood of a successful attack, the degree to which the security measure reduces risk, and the cost of the security measure. To illustrate this approach, the authors apply it to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to assess if its counterterrorism effort reduces the terrorism risk enough to justify its cost. In your article critique, identify the article premise and supporting points on whether or not the authors' vulnerability analysis and risk assessment approaches of the FBI's efforts reduced the terrorism risk enough to justify its cost over a period of time. If so, how? If not, why? The article mentions that the Transportation Security Administration body scanner technology costs about $1.2 billion but does not mention any technology that the FBI is spending its budget on. Do you think this was an oversight or intentional? What new technology is the FBI actually employing? The article also does not address how the FBI is using geographical information systems (GIS) in domestic terror risk assessment and vulnerability analysis. Quickly research how the FBI is using GIS; how could the authors incorporate this information into the article? In addition to the content in the article, discuss two additional technology related recommendations that could be integrated into the author's findings.