The assessments in this course give you the opportunity to design a project plan. Throughout the 5 weeks, you will choose an organization, create a project, write project metrics, and develop a plan that includes a contingency plan. You may use the course textbook and outside resources for all assessments. This week you will choose your organization and learn about its corporate values. Review Strategic Management-8 Most Popular Cases in Connect. Access the case studies from the folder on the main course page in Blackboard. Choose one of the organizations to use for all weekly assessments. You will not be able to change your organization, so make sure you are comfortable with your choice. An organization is typically centered on its mission and vision, but it may not always do as its statement says. Use the Degree of Alignment: Advanced Organizer template to: Describe the mission, vision, values, structure, and culture of the company. Each description should be 75-100 words. Based on your advanced organizer and further research on your company, analyze the degree of alignment between what the organization is currently doing (actions) and their mission, vision, values, structure, and culture. Think about what your company is doing right and on-brand and where there is room for improvement. Your analysis should be 500-750 words. Submit your assignment. The organization I choose is The Walt Disney Company. 

This professor is very tough in grading, and I need this by this Saturday.Other Requirements from the frist 2 weeks of feedback:APA 7th EditionError free grammar/mechanical paperAS # (Auditing Standard # from PCAOB site must be correctly sited and title noted when applicable)Option #2: Auditing Standards & MaterialityThe table provided to you by your instructor contains calculations of several key ratios for a fictitious company, Texanna Pharmaceutical Company, a maker of proprietary and prescription drugs.Texanna is a small- to medium-sized publicly held pharmaceutical company. Approximately 80% of its sales has been in prescription drugs; the remaining 20% is in medical supplies over the counter.Auditor’s calculations are used to ascertain potential risks in anticipation of an audit. Some of this data may indicate the need for other industry- or company-specific data. Many of the company’s drugs are patented and Bamatosis’ (a best seller) patent will expire in 2 years. Over the last five years, this drug alone has accounted for 20% of the company’s sales. The auditor’s evaluation is that the company’s trends this year should be similar to the trend over the last few years and won’t deviate very far from the industry norms.Your instructor will give you the financial information to use in this case.What financial reporting risk conclusions can you draw from this information? Pinpoint high risk of material misstatement in account balances. How will you use this risk analysis in planning the audit? Identify 4 financial reporting risks that you will address during the audit and discuss how you will address those risks.What other critical background information will you want to obtain when planning the audit? When performing the audit, what information do you need? Where would you get this information from?What significant things did the company immediately do in the preceding year? Explain.Examine trends in the data using Excel and highlight these trends in the ratios over the three prior years. Discuss what you noticed in the trends.Perform your analysis in Excel and your written portions in Microsoft Word. Please follow APA format, according to CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.). Include a title page and reference page. Use two (2) outside academic sources other than the textbook, course materials, or other information provided as part of the course materials.RubricACT450 Mod 3 CTACT450 Mod 3 CTCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationIncludes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationIncludes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationIncludes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.8.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceIncludes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationDemonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of audit or analytical procedures; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.8.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis5.0 to >4.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProvides strong or adequate thought, insight and analysis of concepts and applications.4.0 to >3.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.3.0 to >2.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.2.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate thought, insight and analysis.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples5.0 to >4.0 ptsMeets ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.4.0 to >3.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.3.0 to >2.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.2.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceSource or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.5.0 to >4.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.4.0 to >3.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationProject is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.3.0 to >2.0 ptsBelow ExpectationProject is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.2.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceProject is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style5.0 to >4.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.4.0 to >3.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationFew errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.3.0 to >2.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSignificant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.2.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceNumerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 60.0

tgis has 2 parts, let me know...Part one on file and the remaing is part 2Scenario: Using the same organization and the lemonade drink from the Week 4 Learning Team assignment, develop an analysis for the bank. The bank will be using this information to make their final decision on how, and if, to fund your company's new and unique lemonade. Through your research, you have found that the bank you will be presenting to is favorable of socially-conscience companies that support local charitable endeavors. Develop a minimum 350- to 525-word analysis that include the following:Select four of the following methods and explain how they should be used by your company to align best with your target segment and product definition:AdvertisingPublic relationsTraditional Digital marketingNew Digital marketing techniques (describe)Direct marketingEvent marketingOutdoor AdvertisingSelect two of the following forms of sales promotion to promote your product and explain the reasoning for each of your choices:CouponsDealsPremiumsContestsSweepstakesContestsSamplesLoyalty ProgramsPoint-of-purchase displaysRebatesDiscuss ways you can demonstrate to the bank that this company is a socially-conscience organization and will be involved with local social endeavors.Discuss how your company could expand into the global market.Examine promotional methods that could be used to market your lemonade globally.Examine any ethical or moral issues you may encounter while developing and utilizing the various forms of sales promotion.