Hello,Here is all of the info:OVERVIEW:Please read through all sections before proceeding to the next page, and refer back whenever necessary. In this module, you will continue in the same airport information system project scenario that began in Module 1. To refresh your memory, please review your submissions in Module 1 and Module 2.Digital dashboards are dynamic Graphical User Interface (GUI) tools that can present data and metrics in real-time to decision-making users of information systems. Digital dashboards enable managers to view disparate data simultaneously. An example of a digital dashboard that might be utilized by an airport's Operations Department personnel is a digital screen that simultaneously presents one or more live video feeds intermixed with spreadsheet or table data, charts, etc.In this Module 3 activity, you will create a mockup of a hypothetical, customized digital dashboard that the airport's Operations Department personnel could utilize for airport airside operations decision-making and aircraft and vehicle ramp position monitoring purposes. There are two purposes for engaging in this activity, the first being to conduct research on and explore the different types of digital dashboards that are presented in various vendors' information systems solutions. The second purpose is to 'take a break' from the mundane composition-type of assignment activities and to engage in some creative 'fun.'You will utilize Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Word to construct your mockup of a digital dashboard. You will be required to use your imagination and charting skillsets to organize a video feed and sets of analytical data into one viewable screen as you craft your digital dashboard deliverable.To receive a high-level grade in this project assignment, you must put forth a considerable amount of time and effort. You will be graded on the quality of the digital dashboard and the fulfillment of the requirements stated in the Requirements tab that follows.INSTRUCTIONS:Conduct further research on digital dashboards that are utilized in airport information systems. Follow these steps: Survey the data presented on the Module 3 Readings and Resources page to collect your data. You may use the ERAU Hunt Library EAGLEsearch tool (Links to an external site.) and Subject Guides, (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. as well as the Internet to obtain any additional material you might need.Seek diagrams, pictures, and illustrations of digital dashboards that are utilized by airport management from vendors' websites and other informational materials.Construct a hypothetical mockup of a three-part digital dashboard similar to those that were observed in the research process. REQUIREMENTS:Construct the digital dashboard mockup using Microsoft Word and Microsoft Excel . Open a new Microsoft Word document.Select Layout / Orientation / Landscape on the Microsoft Word toolbar. Present three (3) data sets on one (1) 8.5 x 11 page. Select Columns / One in the dropdown list on the Microsoft Word toolbar. For data set #1, embed a hypothetical "live" video feed (for the purposes of this assignment, you will use a static image) of an airport security area in the top half of the document page. Search the Internet and find a JPEG image of an aircraft on an airport tarmac or at a gate.Copy and paste the image on the top half of the Microsoft Word document.Title the image as Airport South Terminal Tarmac. For data set #2, embed a Microsoft Excel worksheet on a bottom quarter of the document page. Create the worksheet as follows: Title the worksheet as Airport Gate Assignments Create the data in a size 12 font.Center-justify the data in all cells.Select All Borders for all cells.Row 1: Merge cells A1, B1, and C1 and input the worksheet title.Row 2: Label Columns 1, 2, and 3 as follows: Gate Number; Flight Number, Aircraft Number. Rows 3 through 8: List data in the columns for six (6) different gate numbers, six (6) different flight numbers, and six (6) different aircraft side numbers, For data set #3, embed a Column chart on the other bottom quarter of the document page. Open a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Delete Columns C and D.Enter "Hour" in Column A, Row 1. Format the cells in Column A, Rows 2-14 by selecting Custom in the dropdown list and setting "0000" as the Custom value.Input "0600" - "1800" in the cells in Column A, Rows 2-14. Enter "Projected Aircraft Arrivals Per Hour" in Column B, Row 1. Format the cells in Column B, Rows 2-14 by selecting Number with no decimal places in the dropdown list.Input random single-digit whole numbers ranging from"1" to "10" in Column B, Rows 2-14. Highlight the cells in Columns A and B, Rows 1-14. Select a Column chart type from the Chart selection area in the Insert tab on the Microsoft Word toolbar. Replace the default Excel data (that opens up in addition to the chart) with the previously-highlighted Excel data by pasting the highlighted data over the default data. Select the Plus (+) icon that pops up at the right side of the chart when you select (left-click) the chart. Select Axes.Select Axis Titles. Label the X- Axis as Aircraft Arrivals. Label the Y- Axis as Hour. Select Data Labels.Deselect Legend Left-click anywhere outside of the chart to finish the chart.Right-click on the top-left corner of the chart, select Copy, and then right-click on the Microsoft Word document and select Paste to paste the chart data in the remaining bottom quarter. Be sure to adjust the height and width of each of the three data sets to fit evenly and completely fill up the document page. MGMT 494 Assignment 3.3 Digital Dashboard Project Rubric MGMT 494 Assignment 3.3 Digital Dashboard Project Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Data Sets Provision 50.0 pts Excellent - ALL THREE data sets were provided. 35.0 pts Satisfactory - TWO data sets were provided. 0.0 pts Failing - A minimum of TWO data sets were NOT provided. 50.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Style & Mechanics 25.0 pts Excellent - The dashboard was presented on ONE page AND in an 8.5 x 11 size landscape orientation AND the data sets were presented in the proper location. 22.0 pts Very Good - The dashboard was presented on ONE page AND in an 8.5 x 11 size landscape orientation OR the data sets were presented in the proper location. 19.0 pts Satisfactory - The dashboard was presented on ONE page OR in an 8.5 x 11 size landscape orientation AND the data sets were presented in the proper location. 16.0 pts Near Failing - The dashboard was presented on ONE page OR in an 8.5 x 11 size landscape orientation OR the data sets were presented in the proper location. 0.0 pts Failing - The dashboard was NOT presented on ONE page OR in an 8.5 x 11 size landscape orientation OR the data sets were presented in the proper location. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Dashboard Format 25.0 pts Excellent - The data in the data sets were formatted with NO errors. 22.0 pts Very Good - The data in the data sets were formatted with 3 to 5 errors. 19.0 pts Satisfactory - The data in the data sets were formatted with 6 to 8 errors. 16.0 pts Near Failing - The data in the data sets were formatted with 9 errors. 0.0 pts Failing - The data in the data sets were formatted with MORE THAN 9 errors. 25.0 pts Total Points: 100.0

Use the Vigee Lebrun comparison images in the module to write an approximately 250 word essay comparing her pre-revolutionary and post-revolutionary portrait. After the Revolution rococo art went out of style and was associated with the vanquished former monarchy. It was no longer fashionable for men to wear colorful or ornamental clothing and make up, and woman were encouraged to be "modest". Cosider the following questions in your essay:How does Vigee-Lebrun represent herself differntly in each portriat?How does she engage the viewer in different ways?How is the palette of each work different?

InstructionsBefore submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the assessor will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.RubricThis assessment has two-parts. Click each of the items below to complete this assessment.Part I: Program Assessment ToolsAccess the following to complete this Assessment:Document #1: Walden Field Letter. You may wish to provide the program you choose with this letter from Walden University’s Program Director for the Master of Science in Early Childhood Studies.Document #2: NAEYC Early Childhood Program Standards and Accreditation Criteria OverviewDocument #3: NAEYC Early Childhood Program Standards and Accreditation CriteriaDocument #4: NAEYC’s Engaging Diverse Families Self-Assessment ChecklistWebsite: NAEYC Accredited Program SearchReview the “NAEYC's Early Childhood Program Standards and Accreditation Criteria” (Document #3) and the “NAEYC Engaging Diverse Families Project Program Self-Assessment Checklist” (Document #4) provided as part of this Work Product. In a 1- to 2-page paper:Explain the purpose of the “NAEYC Early Childhood Program Standards and Accreditation Criteria” and the importance of using them to for assessing program quality.Explain how the “NAEYC Engaging Diverse Families Self-Assessment Checklist” is a useful tool in program evaluation.Part II of your Assessment requires that you use the NAEYC Early Childhood Program Standards and Accreditation Criteria and the NAEYC Engaging Diverse Families Self-Assessment Checklist to evaluate an early childhood program. Using the NAEYC Accredited Program Search, begin researching and contacting NAEYC Accredited programs in your area to determine if you can complete your assignment at that facility. Your local NAEYC Affiliate Groups may be beneficial, if you are having difficulty connecting with a program.PART II of your Assessment requires that you complete Part 7 of the “NAEYC's Early Childhood Program Standards and Accreditation Criteria” and two other portions of the Assessment instrument. To complete this instrument and the “NAEYC Engaging Diverse Families Self-Assessment Checklist,” you will need to both observe within the early childhood environment and conduct staff interviews to determine compliance with factors that can’t be observed. Be sure to carefully review Part 7, the additional criteria you have selected, and the Checklist prior to arriving at the program.Note: When completing the “NAEYC's Early Childhood Program Standards and Accreditation Criteria,” you will mark “Yes” or “No” for each criteria—based on whether it is present or absent. For the Checklist, you will need to record program responses in the corresponding sections of the instrument.Part II: Using Accreditation Standards to Evaluate an Early Childhood ProgramAfter identifying an NAEYC accredited center and conducting your observations and interviews, you will develop a compilation of strengths and opportunity based on your results. Develop a list of what was marked as “Yes” and “No” across each instrument, and compile and overall list of what you see as the programs overall strengths and areas of opportunity.Share your evaluation with the director of the center or a colleague. The colleague could be another student engaged in this competency or a colleague in the early childhood profession. Collaborate with him or her to develop at least two recommendations to strengthen or improve this program. Based on your interviews, notes, observations, and collaboration, write a 6- to 8-page paper that includes the following:A narrative evaluation of the program’s quality in relation to Standard #7, “Families,” and the two additional standards you chose. Your evaluation should describe areas of strength and opportunity for this program. Support your evaluation with specific evidence related to “NAEYC Program Standards and Accreditation Criteria,” your observations, and your interviews.At least two recommendations you have for this program based on the standards. Your recommendations must be grounded in the professional knowledge base.An evaluation of your collaboration experience, including a description of the skills or tools you used to collaborate. How did your work with the director or colleague inform the development of your recommendations?