was stanley milgram's study of obedience unethical, psychology homework help

User Generated

unavaub

Humanities

Description

i need 3 pages for this question.

first page must review the YES side.

secand page must review the NO side.

third page is your response and your opinion.

the papers must be double - spaced and the spelling , grammar and organization must be good .


User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: STANLEY MILGRAM EXPERIMENT

Was Stanley Milgram's Study of Obedience Unethical?
Name
Institution

1

STANLEY MILGRAM EXPERIMENT
Was Stanley Milgram's Study of Obedience Unethical?
Stanley Milgram’s Experiment
In 1961, Stanley Milgram, a renowned psychologist at Yale University successfully
conducted a research of obedience in psychology. He concentrated on the conflict existing
between obedience to authority as well as personal conscience. He analysed the justifications for
the acts of genocide by the accused during the World War II, particularly the Nuremberg War
Criminal trials (Milgram, 1963). Furthermore, their defense focused much on obedience or
following orders from their seniors. The male participants for the study were selected through a
newspaper advertisement inviting applicants to take part in the research at Yale University.
According to the study, ordinary individuals are most likely to observe or follow orders
which are given by a person in authority even when it involves the killing of the innocent people
(Milgram, 2015). The obedience to authority is much ingrained in humans from the manner we
are all brought up. People usually tend to obey orders if they tend to recognize those people
authority as either morally right or legally based. Such a response to the legitimate reaction is
usually learned in various situations for instance, in school, workplace, and family (Herrera,
2013).
The philosophic and legal aspects of obedience are of great importance; nonetheless they
reflect very little how majority of the people behave in some concrete situations. The study
sought to test the much of pain especially an ordinary citizen would mete out on another person
just because he or she was ordered by an experimental scientist (Haslam, 2013). The Milgrams’
Agency Theory explains the behavior of the participants by recommending that people usually
have two state of behavior in any social situation. First, the autonomous state whereby their

2

STANLEY MILGRAM EXPERIMENT

3

direct their own actions and take responsibility for the outcomes of such actions (Milgram,
1963). Additionally, the agentic state whereby people let others to direct their actions and then
blame others for giving such orders. To enter the agentic state the person who gives the orders is
seen as legitimate. Additionally, the person being ordered believes that the authority will assume
responsibility for any outcomes (Milgram, 1963).
Criticism
Milgram’s experiment provoked ethical criticism since his finding were so much
disturbing besides, they revealed many unwelcomed truths on human nature. Other critics argue
that the ethical debate diverted the needed attention from the more grave problems wi...

Similar Content

Related Tags