Verbal Judo is a communication style used to deal with people who are in a highly emotional state. For this discussion, please review the video below.In the Line of Duty: Verbal Judo I Volume 5 Program 2For your initial post, explain why you think verbal judo is an effective or ineffective tool for the role of an officer. Support your argument with at least four specific reasons.For your response post, comment on at least two peers' post that is opposite of the belief you provided for your initial post. Include at least two resources that support your rebuttal to your peers.Due dates for your initial and response posts can be found by checking the Course Syllabus and Course Calendar. Need Help? Click here for complete discussion forum instructions.

Read the following two cases:Case 1: Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185 (1976)Case 2: Harrison v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co., 176 F 3d 776 (1999)Compare and contrast the two cases, providing analyses and critical evaluations of each with reference to the other regarding:The type of fraud at issueThe legal theories discussedThe result of the caseNote that what is required is not a summary of the cases. Instead, offer an informed discussion of your thoughts on fraud liability and the rules for fraud liability. Consider the different scenarios for fraud liability, including those based on an individual, a business, or an employee committing fraud on behalf of an unknowing business.Finally, address the remedies available in such fraud actions. How do remedies in fraud actions attempt to address fairness, and how are they successful—or not successful—in this respect? In answering these questions, research an additional case that supports your position.Your paper should be 3-5 pages in length and should follow the APA Requirements. The paper should include citation and discussion of an additional case to support your proposed remedy.